User talk:Dheeraj L D

Dheeraj L D, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Dheeraj L D! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

August 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Vishwakarma (caste), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liliana ^(UwU) 04:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU Are you from the Vishwakarma community. why are you adding fake information and creating doubts to the readers? Dheeraj L D (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know about the Vishwakarma community until just now, all I know is that your grammar leaves a lot to be desired. Liliana ^(UwU) 04:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU Editing the Wikipedia is okay. But providing fake information to the readers is not. I have been seeing this for the past few years that many people are editing Wikipedia without relevant information. I suggest you to gain knowledge about the Vishwakarma community. Dheeraj L D (talk) 04:54, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think some information is fake/misinformed, please bring it up, as long as it's sourced with reliable sources. Liliana ^(UwU) 04:56, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU The last time I edited this article is regarding a sentence called 'Although having no generally accepted connections to the Brahmins', why is it like this? Wikipedia has become a page that everyone can edit according to their own will. I know many people from the Vishwakarma community who are born Brahmins.

whenever you see someone edit this again, go and ask them the source. afterall all the sources these people are fabricated by themselves. And one more question, in which source it is said that Vishwakarmas are not Brahmins? Dheeraj L D (talk) 05:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Hi, Dheeraj L D. I'm afraid I have noticed various problems with your editing in relation to Wikipedia's rules. Firstly, don't remove sourced content, as you have done at Vishwakarma (caste) and Adimurai. Secondly, don't edit war. Thirdly, Wikipedia does not go by your personal experience but by reliable sources. Fourthly, if you boldly add something to an article and are reverted, you're supposed to respond by starting a discussion on the article's talkpage — not by reverting back. The next time you disrupt Vishwakarma (caste) or Adimurai, or any other page, you will be blocked from editing them. Please note always that Wikipedia is not for caste promotion. Bishonen | tålk 17:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen I notice that you have some problem with this certain community. people like you are trying to degrade a whole community through Wikipedia. Dheeraj L D (talk) 02:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen And can you please explain how can I block you? it will be helpful to other readers as people like you are providing fake information. Dheeraj L D (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You really can't block anyone, only admins can use the block template. Non Admins (Regular Editors) cannot block anyone period. Chip3004 (talk) 03:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chip3004 At least you people be clear about information that you agree in Wikipedia. Few years back when I checked this page (Vishwakarma caste) in Wikipedia, it provided original information like Pourusheya Brahmins. I don't understand who is trying to degrade this community. I am not from this community, but anyway people like you must understand that certain admins here want to provide wrong information to the readers deliberately. Dheeraj L D (talk) 03:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chip3004 what is your claim that Vishwakarmas are not Brahmins, do you belong to this community? Unless and until you get to know more about this certain group, please do not encourage scammers to publish fake information. you can check on other sites too. Wikipedia is the only area where the entire Vishwakarma community is insulted. what source do you want? Get out of Wikipedia and do a thorough study, or else come to India and study about the history about this community. Dheeraj L D (talk) 03:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why people are touching the existing content? Once can clearly see there is hatred on the community, please don't do that. Please get back that information which was published earlier.@Dheeraj L D I appreciate that you questioned. Ganavarapu (talk) 12:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Ekdalian (talk) 19:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case Why don't you block people who are trying to insult a certain community? Dheeraj L D (talk) 04:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, sorry, but the responses on this page and the flatlining learning curve show that the user is not here to help create an encyclopedia, nor prepared to take in anything they're told. Enough constructive editors' time has surely been wasted. New block notice below, hope you don't mind. Bishonen | tålk 09:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Not a problem. I had considered an indef block, actually, for the same reasons, but decided as I often do to see what happened to the user's attitude once he realized we meant it when we threatened to block him.

The answer is now in. And because of it, I will this time see you and raise you one. It's obvious in light of his continued displays of attitude that nothing good will come of letting the user continue to post here, so I will be revoking talk page access. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to help create an encyclopedia, and being actively opposed to learning anything about how Wikipedia works..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 09:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen why should I. if you are happy by blocking me, then be happy. Karma works, it's my curse. Dheeraj L D (talk) 09:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]