User talk:Dematt/Vert Subl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hughgr - put it here. Thanks Dematt, but I took the time time to learn myself. :) See User:Hughgr/hist_of_vs_research

Starting second paragraph......


Between the death of BJ Palmer in 1961 and the Wilk vs. AMA trial beginning in 1976, the investigation into the chiropractic vertebral subluxation shifted its focus to studying conditions that may be related to the subluxation. Low back pain received the most attention and numerous studies have been done in this regard (cite examples).



Current version

The investigation of vertebral subluxation has been ongoing since it was first postulated in 1895. The early practioners used palpation and the anatomy of the nervous system as a guide (meric system). In their efforts to be more specific, they seized the newly discovered X-ray technology and introduced the neurocalometer (a heat sensing device). It was during those early years that the medical establishment first criticized the chiropractic profession, saying that the conditions that those early chiropractors were treating were only psychophysiologic disorders. To prove that chiropractic patients had real conditions, BJ Palmer opened a research clinic as a part of the Palmer College of Chiropratic. When a patient entered the clinic, they were first examined by medical doctors and a diagnosis was formulated. They were then sent to the chiropractic part of the clinic, treated, and sent back to the medical doctors for evaluation. Research into postmortum nerve shrinkage Since then, chiropractors have sought a greater understanding of the mechanisms and effects of the vertebral subluxation. Today we see motion x-rays, surface EMG, and digital thermography.


"Conclusions: Joint complex dysfunction should be included in the differential diagnosis of pain and visceral symptoms because joint complex dysfunction can often generate symptoms which are similar to those produced by true visceral disease."[1]

A 2004 reasearch team at the National University of Health Sciences evaluated changes of the lumbar vertebral column following fixation (immobility). Their findings indicate that fixation results in time-dependent degenerative changes of the zygapophysial joints.[1]

Researchers at the RMIT University-Japan, Tokyo studied reflex effects of subluxation with regards to the autonomic nervous system. They found that "recent neuroscience research supports a neurophysiologic rationale for the concept that aberrant stimulation of spinal or paraspinal structures may lead to segmentally organized reflex responses of the autonomic nervous system, which in turn may alter visceral function."[2]

Professor Philip S. Bolton of the School of Biomedical Sciences at University of Newcastle, Australia writes in JMPT, "The traditional chiropractic vertebral subluxation hypothesis proposes that vertebral misalignment cause illness, disease, or both. This hypothesis remains controversial." His objective was, "To briefly review and update experimental evidence concerning reflex effects of vertebral subluxations, particularly concerning peripheral nervous system responses to vertebral subluxations. Data source: Information was obtained from chiropractic or, scientific peer-reviewed literature concerning human or animal studies of neural responses to vertebral subluxation, vertebral displacement or movement, or both." He concluded, “Animal models suggest that vertebral displacements end putative vertebral subluxations may modulate activity in group I to IV afferent nerves. However, it is not clear whether these afferent nerves are modulated during normal day-to-day activities of living and, if so, what segmental or whole-body reflex effects they may have.”[2]

Conclusions: Monitoring mixed-nerve root discharges in response to spinal manipulative thrusts in vivo in human subjects undergoing lumbar surgery is feasible. Neurophysiologic responses appeared sensitive to the contact point and applied force vector of the spinal manipulative thrust. Further study of the neurophysiologic mechanisms of spinal manipulation in humans and animals is needed to more precisely identify the mechanisms and neural pathways involved. [3]

Researchers at the Department of Physiology, University College London studied the effects of compression upon conduction in myelinated axons. Using pneumatic pressure of varying degrees on the sciatic nerves of frog specimens, the studied supported the idea of nerve conduction failure as a result of compression. [4]

A model for chronic nerve root compression studies. [3]

  1. ^ Cramer G, Fournier J, Henderson C, Wolcott C. "Degenerative changes following spinal fixation in a small animal model". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 27 (3): 141–54. PMID 15129196.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Bolton P (2000). "Reflex effects of vertebral subluxations: the peripheral nervous system. An update". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 23 (2): 101–3. PMID 10714535.
  3. ^ Colloca C, Keller T, Gunzburg R, Vandeputte K, Fuhr A (2000). "Neurophysiologic response to intraoperative lumbosacral spinal manipulation". J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 23 (7): 447–57. PMID 11004648.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ The effects of compression upon conduction in myelinated axons of the isolated frog sciatic nerve. R Fern and P J Harrison, Department of Physiology, University College London. J Physiol. 1991 January; 432: 111–122. available online