User talk:De Disney

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, De Disney. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liza Arzamasova

The article Liza Arzamasova has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very poorly sourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, De Disney. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, De Disney. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, De Disney. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, De Disney. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Maleficent disney.png

The file File:Maleficent disney.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No longer used at Maleficent. Did not satisfy minimal usage criterion, as it was redundant with File:Malefica.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Maleficent disney.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maleficent disney.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, De Disney, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as DisneyRuFan200922 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

DisneyRuFan200922 is my another account I just created, because I couldn't find the way to change this account's username (which I'm not fond of it). However, because of the reasons you mentioned, I've decided to not further use said account and stick to this one. Also, can you explain, how official books, web and news media and video materials are considered a "poor sourcing"? All of those materials are officially published by Disney and company-related people, not to mention some of them were already used on the page. De Disney (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I concede that you used some good sources. The Disney Family Museum page about the film is one of the ones I thought was "poor" but it is fine.

You used the blog wdwnt.com for one source. Blogs are generally discouraged.

Please don't link years or dates, for instance November 25 or 1950. English-language Wikipedia stopped doing that more than ten years ago. Binksternet (talk) 14:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

So, if I slightly alter the text to make it shorter and consider all you mentioned, can I restore all my previous edits (with all the fixing)? And, by the way, wdwnt.com link was added here long before I edited the page. De Disney (talk) 14:46, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

I added some of your text back in, trimming a lot and rewording a bit. I think your earlier contribution added too much detail, too many quotes. Binksternet (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Alice in Wonderland (2010 film), you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add your own Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus to film articles. Per MOS:FILM: "The overall critical reception to a film should be supported by attributions to reliable sources that summarize reviews; do not synthesize individual reviews. Avoid weasel words. If any form of paraphrasing is disputed, quote the source directly." We have a source that summarizes the critical consensus for us. We don't need your opinions in the article, too. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

101 Dalmatians TV Shows

Can you also make improvements to the articles of the television shows? They have multiple issues in them, like needing additional citations. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I will be waiting for your review. De Disney (talk) 05:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)

The article Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) and Talk:Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)

The article Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Adamstom.97 -- Adamstom.97 (talk) 07:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SnowWhiteAndTheSevenDwarfs1937CharacterCast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SnowWhiteAndTheSevenDwarfs1937CharacterCast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

About Sleeping Beauty article

I was just correcting the information of the plot of Sleeping Beauty. Stefan's attempts of burning spinning wheels does NOT do enough to stop the curse and we do NOT know how admirable this deed is because it counts as fridge brilliance (NOT enough depth of how admirable it is). Stefan being soft spoken isn't always the case as he's still prone to being tempremental, argumentative, and wrathful, as well as having some anger outbursts. Third, "the man and Phillip" is way too far of a stretch and confusing to some people I would say "Flora overhears the sleepy conversation from the two kings and realized that Phillip is the same man Aurora had previously met". Fourth, Phillip was the one responsible for not only saving Aurora, but also the entire kingdom, and fifth, I found out on Jim Korkis' book "Off to Neverland" confirmed that according to page 92 on his book, Mr. Hans Conried did indeed audition and did live action reference as Stefan, though the voice role for the final version was taken by Taylor Holmes, which I consider Walt's decision reckless and that is why we never know the truth about the herald's voice, same can apply to the Queen and Raven. I also posted this on YouTube and Facebook about Bob Thomas' claim that "Many Actors auditioned for King Stefan" which is quite misleading as they're no evidence to support this claim that should be debunked. Evidence is what it takes to make sure if the claim is true or false, as well as my criticism towards you and this film. 2600:1702:2FD0:93D0:E177:B98E:49BC:1AF3 (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Sleeping Beauty copyedit

Hello, thank you so much for copyedit, it really means a lot! De Disney (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Query

I think Wynken, Blynken & Nod needs its D+ release date right now. Visokor (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 08:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I will be waiting for your review. De Disney (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sleeping Beauty (1959 film)

The article Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sleeping Beauty (1959 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MaryCosta&MarcDavisSB1958.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MaryCosta&MarcDavisSB1958.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)