User talk:Daughter of Mímir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Daughter of Mímir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Algaculture[edit]

Hi Daughter of Mímir. Thank you for your contribution to Algaculture. However, since Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, it is important to cite credible sources. You stated that: "large scale algaculture of the oceans... is proposed...". But you didn't cite who proposed it. I have left your contribution in place, but without citation it will eventually be removed. --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. We'll see if I may find a source to it before somebody removes it. Daughter of Mímir (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Multivitamin and your kind words.--TheNautilus (talk) 19:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Invitation[edit]

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in contributing more to medical related articles you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (signup here).


--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation! I'll have a look. Daughter of Mímir (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links to dab pages[edit]

Hi, I noticed your Template:Large numbers. I've been keeping an eye on links to some disambiguation pages, because they're generally not seen as the best way to go. Your template includes a link to billion which is such a dab page. I wonder, did you link to show that billion can be ambiguous, or were you thinking of it as 109? If it's the former then I mignt modify it to link to Billion (disambiguation), which emphasises the intent of the link, and if it's the latter then perhaps 1000000000 might work? What do you think? --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS Long and short scales might interest you too.

Actually I didn't think about that ambiguation. Just thought of billion as a large number with an own article (saw it had a link on that Names of numbers article). I think the disambiguation page works fine as a target. User:Daughter of Mímir (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Medical fiction[edit]

I have nominated Category:Medical fiction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Medicine and health in fiction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Fences&Windows 19:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Factor 4" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Factor 4 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Factor 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of reflexes (by organ) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of reflexes (by organ) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of reflexes (by organ) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Anti-stuttering medications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stuttering medication is not something that exists (no FSA approved medications exist for stuttering treatment) and the existence of this page risks medical misinformation. If and when a medication exists, it will be included in the stuttering and stuttering therapy pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]