User talk:Data-visualization-tools

Welcome!

Hello, Data-visualization-tools, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 09:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Data visualization tools[edit]

A tag has been placed on Data visualization tools, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Data visualization tools and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 09:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

external links[edit]

Stop adding this crap, please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niqax (talk • contribs) 11:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Data Visulation Tools[edit]

Hi, it is obvious that you are representing the company and have a conflict of interest. What I suggest that you do is register a new Wikipedia logon name for your own personal use. It is best to not write about your self or your company, as it is hard to not be promotional or present it in a balanced way. See WP:COI. You can write in a sandbox as an experiment, eg User:Data-visualization-tools/sandbox. This should be safer from deletion as the quality standards do not apply. Let me know if you would like a review on what you wrote in your own sandbox.

You are also welcome to edit Tableau Software, the language there is not excessively promotional, but you can add {{advertisment}} to things that look like an ad. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]