User talk:Coradon

Chronicles of Thomas Covenant

I had thought much the same. However without others interested it would be quite a task to do it from scratch. Have you checked into the WP:NOVELS and the template for articles which provides a good starting place to thinking about article construction. If I started on one book would you be able to contribute. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Looks like someone have just beaten us to it. Take a look . :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 14:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

A closer look at Nicolás Guillén and Nicolás Guillén Landrián shows that they are about different people, and for this reason, I have removed your request from the listings at WP:RM. Also, please note that WP:RM is used for moving pages when only one page has text; if you want to combine two pages with text, you can boldly do it yourself, or add {{merge}} tags to the pages in question. Thanks! Dekimasuよ! 08:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Lol, nice catch, missed that one completely. Coradon (talk) 00:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism not properly reverted

Hi there. One of your actions is mentioned at Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows#Vandalism not properly reverted. I'm not sure how aware you are of how to spot that sort of vandalism, so I've left this note to everyone who failed to spot it. Would you be able to comment over there if you have time? Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I'm not entirely familiar with the whole revert process when it comes to reverting something that has multiple edits made after the vandalism was done. Because of this, I decided to just copy/paste the section that was missing using a previous versian. If you have a moment, can I get you to post something here that explains step-by-step how I should have handled undoing the deletion of the Battle of Hogwarts section. I use Wikipedia on a daily basis and I'm sure this situation with come up again at some point.Coradon (talk) 06:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Once other edits have been made to the page, the "undo" link doesn't always work. Look at the edit the vandal made (see here), and click "undo". If it works, check it worked properly by looking at what it has changed. If it doesn't work, copy/paste is the right way to do it, but be careful to do this accurately. You can check by doing a comparison such as this. Go to the page history, click "100" at the top to get your edit and the vandal's edit on the same page, then compare them by clicking next to the version before the vandal edit in the left hand column, and then next to your edit in the right hand column, and clicking "compare selected versions" at the top of the page. If the vandal edit was the last one to the page, you can usually undo. You can also click the page version you want to revert to and click "edit" and resave it saying "reverting back to last clean version". There is also a tool called WP:ROLLBACK, but if you don't have that, best to be sure you know how to use it before asking for it. Carcharoth (talk) 12:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you sir, that should help. Coradon (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Coradon! Thanks for correcting some mistakes in the intro of the article Fitna (film). As you can see on my userpage, English is not my native language, yet, I tried to improve it. If you know anything to make the intro sound better and/or more neutral, please tell me! Cheers, Face 10:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Coradon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Coradon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coradon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coradon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)