User talk:Contrib raati

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Contrib raati, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Newyorkbrad (talk) 11:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: If you get a notification that I reverted one of your edits, please ignore it—that was an inadvertent misclick on my part. Newyorkbrad (talk) 11:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Please don't indiscriminately slap categories like "Anti-assadists" on the page of every politician who has been critical of Assad's regime. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning Please don't add categories such as you did in "Constitutional monarchy" page until you become familiar how categories work in wikipedia. Please read very carefully Wikipedia:Categorization. - üser:Altenmann >t 02:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old World[edit]

You need to get back to the misc ref desk and tell us precisely what you mean by "Old World". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, bugs means that if you're not happy with the answers already provided, you could get better ones by better describing what you meant. You don't need to do anything. 75.69.10.209 (talk) 22:21, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If he wants better answers, he needs to explain what he means by "Old World". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I miscalculated in that question. I forgot about Siberia being so nearby, so the premise of my question was false in the first place. Contrib raati (talk) 04:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A heads up[edit]

A quick heads up that I've nominated your piece Incest in entertainment for deletion. The debate is at WP:AFD. best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Caliphizing" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Caliphizing and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Caliphizing until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Caliphizes" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Caliphizes and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Caliphizes until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Caliphise" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Caliphise and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Caliphise until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Incest in film and television for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incest in film and television is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in film and television until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Incest in literature for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Incest in literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incest in literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]