User talk:Comradesandalio

Welcome!

Hello, Comradesandalio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Y not? 18:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish libertarians[edit]

There's no such category. If it existed, it would probably be deletable as a meaningless intersection. I have reverted your additions. -- Y not? 18:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paleocon category[edit]

Please don't add categories, like category:paleoconservatives, to biographies that don't mention that political orientation. Otherwise there's no assertion to back it up. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must second this, as you have made a similar edit to the James Bamford article, putting him in the "anti-Zionists" category. There is no mention whatsoever of his attitudes toward the state of Israel in the article, thus you cannot just add him to this category. Incidentally, I highly doubt that Bamford qualifies as an anti-Zionist, but if you have evidence that he does you could include it in the article and then add him to that category. Thanks.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William Cash (journalist)[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on William Cash (journalist), by Slp1 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because William Cash (journalist) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Attack? I am concerned about the lack of sources (especially reliable sources) for these very controversial (and NPOV?) claims about a living person. He does not even seem to be a "famous journalist" based on a quick google search, but certainly seems to have written at least one article for the Spectator

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting William Cash (journalist), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate William Cash (journalist) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New articles[edit]

A tag has been placed on Andrew McCarthy (journalist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

attack page: an unsourced biography of a living person which makes a controversial assertion about advocacy of torture. I can find no reliable source for this person's name and "legalized torture"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Slp1 01:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Comrade! I am quite worried about some of the edits and especially the new pages you have created and have nominated 2 of them for deletion because I am concerned that they are unsourced. They contain significant negative allegations, and these must be sourced if they are to remain in an article, most especially when the person is living. Can I suggest that you carefully read the policy about this WP:BLP before you create or edit any other articles about living people? Thanks and good Luck! --Slp1 01:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article[edit]

Hi Comrade and thanks for your message. The good news is that I have absolutely no say in whether you recreate an article about Mr. Cash! It is totally up to you! But before you do, I think it would be very important that you read (and inwardly digest) certain key Wikipedia policies, including Biographies of Living People, Neutral Point of View, Reliable Sources and even Notability. Based on a cursory google searches on this person, I have found it very difficult find reliable sources for him, since websites, blogs, commentaries etc are out as sources and these seem to make up most of the references to him (online at least). Maybe you will be more successful than me! All of these policies have serious implications about what you write, the words you use, and even whether you have enough reliably sourced material to warrant an article at all. Maybe a brief mention in a related article (with a reliable source of course) would be better. Let me know if you need any more help or questions. Slp1 19:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Ben-Ariel[edit]

The same comments I wrote above also apply to the Ben-Ariel article which you have created. You have added references, which is a great start, but they are not Reliable Sources because they are blogs, advertisements for books, etc or do not link to any specific articles. None of them (that I can see) contain the information you have added about him, and these absolutely need reliable sources before they can be included on Wikipedia. I am removing the most problematic examples immediately. Please do not reinstate them unless you can find reliable sources for this information, and that does not include blogs, forums etc. I realize that learning about the rules here can be difficult and frustrating and I hope you don`t get discouraged! --Slp1 01:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable contributors[edit]

I notice that you are adding to the lists of "notable contributors" in various articles. For Wikipedia purposes, "notable" means having a WP biography. So if a name is redlinked, it isn't notable. Now there are sometimes exceptions - people who genuinely merit an article but about whom one hasn't been written - but it's a good rule of thumb to follow. As a reminder, the criteria for an article is at WP:BIO. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Will Beback just made up a non-existent rule, in order to rationalize his own political prejudices and personal grudges, and to limit, by any means necessary, the entries, citations, and links to writers popularly identified as conservative. A study of his history of wikistalking and vendettas as User:Will Beback alias User:Willmcw alias User:User2004, and of censoring articles on race and ethnicity, will bear out the above charge.

On his vendettas, see:

JulesH 00:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

On his dickliness, see:

“Will, please stop acting like a dick. Really really - David Gerard” 12:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Both entries are at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Will_Beback#Removal_of_links_to_nielsenhayden.com. 70.23.167.160 08:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jacob Katz, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from inventing non-existent "policies," in order to intimidate editors out of creating pages about significant figures towards whom you are hostile, due to your political POV. Such behavior is highly inappropriate, and not in accordance with our policies. Thank you.

70.23.167.160 20:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katz[edit]

It's not because he's not notable - it's because you didnt say WHY he was notable. Unless you state why, and provide sources proving this, then it is considered not notable. Also plase note, I did not delete the page and I cannot delete pages. I just placed a notice saying that it should be. Please read the notability policies. It's not just about whether they are notable, it's if you say they are notable and have a source to prove it. Also, if you are writing very small articles, you can reduce the chances of them getting deleted as quickly using a stub tag, by placing {{stub}} at the bottom of the page. Lastly, when placing comments on pages, please sign your posts with ~~~~. This will add your username and the date/time so that people can reply easier.

Thanks, and if you have any more questions, feel free to ask. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 01:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Dan Seligman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dan Seligman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 19:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New articles[edit]

Thanks for contributing so many new articles. However you appear to be using a poorly-formatted article as your template. You might review the changes I made to Marcus Epstein.

Subject names should be made bold with three quote marks (''') rather than brackets ([[]]).
External links sections should be called "External links" (note the lowercase second word - headings use sentence case.)
Use {{writer-stub}} instead of [[Category:Writer stubs]].
Avoid redundant categories. All Korean Americans are American people, for example. We generally only use the "sharpest" category.
Use {{DEFAULTSORT:lastname, firstname}} so that articles will be sorted correctly in category listings.

If you follow these guidelines then it will make your articles more consistent with the rest of the project. Cheers. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of The American Cause[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The American Cause, by RHaworth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The American Cause is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The American Cause, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate The American Cause itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charley Reese[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Charley Reese. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Life, Liberty, Property 06:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Ben-Ariel[edit]

A tag has been placed on David Ben-Ariel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how David Ben-Ariel is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:David Ben-Ariel saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Jayran 17:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete material from Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2007, May 27. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --A. B. ^(talk) 15:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview, Group, Summarize[edit]

Please consider 1) Using the Show Preview button (beside the Save Page button), 2) Grouping edits together to avoid clogging the page's edit History which makes it hard for fellow editors to monitor the edits, 3) Describing each edit with the Edit Summary box (above the Save Page button). Hu (talk) 04:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Notability of James Buchanan (activist)[edit]

A tag has been placed on James Buchanan (activist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 05:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wayne Paul Harris[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wayne Paul Harris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Salona (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Susanne Winter[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Susanne Winter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dwight D. Murphey[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dwight D. Murphey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wisdom89 (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

   ==Notability of Matt Nuenke==

A tag has been placed on Matt Nuenke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nkrosse (talk) 00:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Michael Berman (AR)[edit]

An editor has nominated Michael Berman (AR), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Berman (AR) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Michael Berman (AR)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Michael Berman (AR) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Senseless (talk) 20:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Jobling[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Ian Jobling, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Bamford[edit]

What evidence do you have that James Bamford is a paleoconservative? I have never heard him described that way, either by himself or others, and he is not described that way in our article, yet you keep adding the paleoconservative category to his article. If you do not explain the basis for categorizing him that way I am going to remove the category again. I don't think it is remotely appropriate to add that cat unless Bamford himself describes himself that way, or unless he is widely described that way by others (the latter seems particularly unlikely). Please reply on my talk page if you can, thanks.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 15:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elaine Kelley[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elaine Kelley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Elaine Kelley. Relata refero (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Elaine Kelley[edit]

I have nominated Elaine Kelley, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elaine Kelley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Relata refero (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Kalb[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article James Kalb, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jewnikah[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, racially motivated edits, such as those you made to Jewnikah, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Toddst1 (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

non existing category[edit]

Hello Comradesandalio,
This category doesn't exist. If you want to use this, you must create it first... Ceedjee (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Steele[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Edgar Steele, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Edgar Steele. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign to Delete Nicholas Stix[edit]

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to: navigation, search [edit] Nicholas Stix Nicholas Stix (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log) Subject is a barely-noted blogger and freelance journalist. He has not been the subject of any profiles, and has not won any awards, though he has been mentioned in passing in a few articles on other topics. Previously, an editor, possibly Stix himself, made a nuisance of himself by doing nothing but adding links and mentions of Stix to numerous articles.User:70.23.199.239/User:70.23.167.160 This article was created by a brand-new account, and I suspect it's more self-promotion. •:• Will Beback •:• 06:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nicholas_Stix

The admin initiating the AfD has a well-known vendetta against Stix, and against conservatives in general. The trigger appears to have been a minor edit by you. As far as I can see, whenever you start or edit an article about a conservative intellectual or journalist, one pc admin or another immediately nominates the article in question for deletion.

24.90.201.232 (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this has been an ongoing campaign against conservatives at wikipedia, as opposed to neo-"conservatives".Comradesandalio (talk) 21:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Stormfront (website), you will be blocked from editing. Skomorokh 22:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but adding the restrained category, "Blogs critical of Judaism," at an article about a Web site that was founded by a former member of the American Nazi Party, a site whose very name is an unmistakable allusion to Nazism, does not constitute vandalism, and cannot lead to a block, though your attempt at intimidation may lead to one.

24.90.201.232 (talk) 23:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paleoconservatives[edit]

I bnotice that you're adding the Paleo- category to a number of individuals who were not alive or active when that term was first defined. What is your source or justification for these designations? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any response so I'm going to delete the category from people who died before the 1980s, whtn the term was first used. Later people should still have a source for the description. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boris Pribich[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boris Pribich (2nd nomination) ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of massacres committed during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 00:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of massacres committed during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Griffin, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 22:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 22:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote the following on my user page (minor note - please use talk pages to leave messages, not user pages):

'Any proof that he is a Holocaust denier? I know that wikipedia insists Mahmoud Abbas is not. I know that Griffin is one of few patriotic Brits left, and a mainstream conservative as opposed to a neo or pseudo conservative. He is also on the front lines risking his career fighting Nazism and radical Islam. So if you print slander on a respected figure who undoubtedly deserves to be knighted, I will request that you be blocked.

Did you read the article? It has a whole paragraph, complete with sources, detailing Griffin's holocaust denial. You have made your point of view extremely clear, and your continued vandalism of that (and other) articles has resulted in a block. When the block expires, please avoid such actions. Thanks, Gwernol 22:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Constantin von Hoffmeister[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Constantin von Hoffmeister, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gwernol 02:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk:Gromlakh, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Categories, again[edit]

What's your source for Lawrence Auster being a "former leftist"? There's no mention in the article. Every category you add should be supported by sourced information in the article. If you don't respond I'll remove the categories you've added. Note that you've had many complaints about this type of editing in the past. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing no response, I have to asume you have no sources for the category application. I've reverted those that didn't have any mention of past leftism. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marian Van Court[edit]

This article was recently deleted. PLease don't recreate it again. If you'd like to contest the deletion please use WP:DRV. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael O'Meara[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael O'Meara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gwernol 20:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

typo or what?[edit]

I reverted your recent edit to Rob Knox. You changed "Jamie, who was being threatened by two men." to "Jamie, who was being threatened by black two men." Not only is the word "black" in the wrong place, but the skin color of the men attacking Jamie is not relevant to an article about his brother. I marked it as pure vandalism and was going to give you the usual {{uw-vand1}} welcome before realizing you were an established editor. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Jacobs as eugenicist[edit]

If you are determined to have this part of the Wiki article on the great folklorist - please get a better reference - a vague mention of a "Mr. Jacobs" (it is after all quite a common surname) at the end of an article on the subject is really neither specific nor reliable enough. If Joseph Jacobs really was interested in eugenics then there is very likely to be a published record of this - in fact unless he actually published something on the topic himself it is probably not sufficiently notable anyway. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit from my page: The article says Joseph Jacobs, not just Jacobs. Are we reading the same article? It is also clear that it is the fairy tale writer Joseph Jacobs, as the findings of the study on the Jewish children were published in the Jewish Encyclopedia which the fairy tale writer helped edit. I'll bring more sources though.

Oops! found the reference to "Joseph Jacobs" on the previous page! Missed that in my first reading. Yes, I do accept we are talking about the same person!! But finding a mention of his name in an article on a subject is not conclusive, what we would want would be a copy of the text of the paper J.J. read. He may even have concluded from the results of the experiment that there WAS no "Jewish type", or that his interest was purely in the facial features of the boys (not necessarily from an eugenic point of view). In any case this is very highly peripheral to a case linking eugenics and J.J. As for the second reference - it is a very fleeting and most inconclusive reference in a review - it might pay to get hold of a copy of the work concerned? If it is in fact authoritative enough to serve as an encyclopediac source. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. I have copied this exchange to the "discussion" tab on the article concerned - suggest you pursue the matter there.

Race and Rob Knox[edit]

While newspapers may report titillating details such as the race of attackers, in most cases the information is not encyclopedic and has no place here. It might be encyclopedic if the incident lead to a race riot or to anti-race-based-hate-crime legislation, but otherwise at best it's mere trivia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 20:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your extraordinary line about most blacks in the UK being African. Firstly, I think you will find most blacks in the UK are British. If you are referring to their heritage for some reason you might realise the influx of immigrants from the Caribbean. Your comments about Aborigines and Indians indicate further confusion. Either way, the race of the alleged attackers are not important. MrMarmite (talk) 12:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paleoconservatism[edit]

The external link you added to Paleoconservatism was highly inappropriate. Please do not continue using Wikipedia to advance your personal agenda, or you will be blocked (again) for disruption. Gwernol 00:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category question[edit]

What's our source for saying that MacDonald is half German?[1] ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thakns for your reply. Can we find that magazine? Also, "German Americans" is used for people who are half German or more. "Americans of German descent" is for those who are less than half German. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ben Kinsella[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ben Kinsella, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Kinsella. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Quentin X (talk) 15:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of No War For Israel[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article No War For Israel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Enigma ^message 04:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of No War For Israel[edit]

I have nominated No War For Israel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No War For Israel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Enigma ^message 18:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD: Category:Jewish anti-Zionists[edit]

Hi. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 July 2#Category:Jewish anti-Zionists. Thank you. IZAK (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Livingstone[edit]

I've reverted your latest WP:NPOV-busting edit. The "endorsement" of Livingstone by the National Alliance is sourced from a dubious source. Let's assume its true: dozens if not hundreds of groups support Livingstone. Unless you list them all (or a reasonable sample of them) then you are seriously biasing the article by picking out one supporting group, especially this one. In addition, unless Livingstone is aware of this support and accepts it, it says nothing about him that the group has supported him, it only says something about the National Alliance. The support should go on their article not Livingstone's. I could get the Save the Pigeon-toed Weasel Society to proclaim support for Livingstone, but its meaningless unless he accepts, rejects or somehow acknowledges it and that reaction makes the mainstream media. Gwernol 15:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Knox[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Rob Knox, you will be blocked from editing. Nick Cooper (talk) 15:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism and repeated WP:NPOV violations. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 16:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Casualties of political Islam[edit]

A tag has been placed on Casualties of political Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I know you clearly saw the text above that says "Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself..." in This Edit. Don't delete the tag again! If you want to comment, it also instructed you to "use the{{hangon}}tag". ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 23:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Casualties of political Islam[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Casualties of political Islam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for your block[edit]

You were repeatedly warned that you have to stop imposing your own personal viewpoint. After so many warnings we have no choice but to block you, since it is clear that you are not willing or able to follow the rules, particularly around providing sources and maintaining a neutral point of view. The block was to prevent you further damaging articles. Please follow the rules, or your next block is likely to be substantially longer. Gwernol 23:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see. Can I find any examples of you being warned for violating Wikipedia rules? Can I think of a page where such warnings might be left? Tell you what, why don't you see if you can answer your own question. Let me give you a clue: try looking at this page. Gwernol 23:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this[edit]

Please stop the creation of the Casualties of political Islam article, it has now been twice deleted. RFerreira (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to intimidate this user. There is no rule forbidding the recreation of articles that have previously been deleted. 74.66.87.36 (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tom Piatak[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tom Piatak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 03:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patrick McGee[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fraud ^{talk to me} 02:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patrick McGee[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Patrick McGee, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McGee. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 02:16, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Weissberg[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert Weissberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria for academics--work is not well-known or widely cited

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jvr725 22:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Hartung[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Hartung, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of notablity

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. bonadea contributions talk 16:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Hartung[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, John Hartung, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hartung. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Will Beback talk 06:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Takuan Seiyo[edit]

The article Takuan Seiyo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, tagged over a year.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Will Beback talk 22:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Taft Club[edit]

The article Robert Taft Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, tagged for notability since 2007.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Will Beback talk 16:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Comradesandalio! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Robert W. Tucker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Elizabeth Wright[edit]

I have nominated Elizabeth Wright, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Wright. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.