User talk:Commking

Welcome!

Hello, Commking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist 00:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asalouyeh[edit]

That's an excellent article, new or otherwise! A good way to get more input on how to improve that article is by putting it up for Peer Review. I'm sure it'll be a Featured Article soon at this rate. karmafist 05:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And from me, good job there and welcome. You'll see I've added a References section to the article page. This isn't a criticism merely a reflection of the fact that with wikipedia getting so much coverage, some of it is about the reliability of information; references are becoming more and more important for people to verify facts. Regards and keep up the good work! SeanMack 12:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If an article is all from one persons experience at some stage the article may fall foul of Wikipedia:No original research. However in my opinion with a few citations and references your article will be fine. I've added a reference in there with some info about Hyundai that shows you the current best practise for entering references. Regards. SeanMack 14:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for articles to work on?[edit]

Hello, Commking. I'm SuggestBot, a Wikipedia bot that helps new members contribute to Wikipedia. You might like to edit these articles I picked for you based on things you've edited in the past. Check it out -- I hope you find it useful. -- SuggestBot 14:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pershing[edit]

Take a look at Test and Evaluation of Land-Mobile Missile Systems (PDF) from APL/Johns Hopkins. Page 3 has an excellent diagram showing respective ranges of Pershing 1A, Pershing 2 and Gryphon. As you can see, the P2 range was just short of Moscow. From 1984 to 1989 there were 108 P2 (US Army) and 72 P1A (German Air Force) missiles deployed. I'm not sure of the number of Gryphons. P2 only had a 50 kT warhead and the earth penetrator warhead was never released due to technical issues, thus it was not a strategic missile. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Edmunds[edit]

Someone (user:Bosun) launched off your link and created "Mr Stinky", which I then cleaned up. Any info you have to add here would be interesting too. Welcome to Wikipedia :-) - David Gerard 14:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants). Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers!

R o gerthat ^Talk 07:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians[edit]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Pascarl-Gillespie[edit]

Sorry if this is the wrong place to place a comment - please excuse me - I apologise! REgrds,

Just a note, someone called wao lin is continually adding incorrective data to this entry regarding the paternity of Jacqueline Pascarl's youngest child. The daughter is question is the legally recognised daughter of her husband, Bill Crocaris. Verity is not the child of Pascarl's former husband, Iain Gillespie. I have amended this continuous assertion due to the legally provable nature of it's wrongness. I know the family very well and these wrong assertions are terribly distressing to the small child involved as it is coming up in public discussion. Please be responsible and do not base your wikipedia comments on gossip garnered from ill researched magazine and newspaper gossip items. Just because you heard it, doesn't make it true and correct. REal people are involved and small children too!!!

Golda Meir[edit]

Hi ! this is with respect to the triva that you haved added to Golda Meir, that she was the first woman to control a Nuclear Weapons Programme . India tested a Nuclear device in 1974 when Indira Gandhi was prime minister. I was just curious about the source of your info since Israel has never given any information about the start date of its programme or for that matter even on its existance. --Arjun sugumar 05:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Hey, despite what was said at the talk page at Mahathir, I don't hold any ill feeling against Australians. I myself have Australians friends. The criticism was only directed at the government. So, I hope we're okay. =) __earth ^(Talk) 13:39, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swan Island[edit]

Hi Commking. Apologies for my late reply. I've just moved house 700kms and my time has been spent elsewhere of late. Nice article. I'll see what I can help out with. I'm from down that way and have spent some time in and around Swan Island at times. -- Longhair 09:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've never been onto the island. As your article says, it's a highly classified military area. The closest I've come is canoeing around the bay nearby. A photo of the bridge leading to the island would be great though. It's quite a unique bridge, with an interesting design. Problem is, as from this month, I'm now living miles away. -- Longhair 21:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've got similiar military friends who act the same way and refuse to talk about the island. Which category name do you prefer? I'll get started on it today and help out with populating it -- Longhair 22:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should check with Wikipedia:WikiProject ADF to see what their preference is? -- Longhair 01:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Olivers Hill[edit]

What photo(s) of Olivers Hill were you after? I walk to the beach there fairly regularly. Although probably the best photo would be taken from a boat... --ozzmosis 11:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've replaced the photo on the article. It's not perfect but I think it's better than the previous one I had there... --ozzmosis 14:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankston North[edit]

Thank you for your communication. I have a list of sources and citations re the above article. I will work over the next few days to add these to the page. regards Encise 23:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Encise[reply]

Mt Eliza[edit]

G-unit, short for "guerrilla unit", is rap slang for something or other (and the record label for 50 Cent) - just a vandal, and probably a current or former student, I'd say. Orderinchaos 01:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pars Online

A tag has been placed on Pars Online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Pars Online. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Mhking 03:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article to be notable - check out my comments on the talk page --Commking 04:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parsonline_logo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Parsonline_logo.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — coel acan — 18:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Rain ISP, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Araax[edit]

A tag has been placed on Araax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Captain panda 00:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Rain ISP[edit]

Add notability? Notability is already there - Rain ISP‎ is the only ISP in Zahedan. --Commking 23:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add that tag. Feel free to remove it if you like. --Fang Aili ^talk 01:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oi[edit]

It took you nearly a year to decide!? --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 05:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Parsonline logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Parsonline logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aftab[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aftab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alborz Net[edit]

AfD nomination of Alborz Net[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Alborz Net, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alborz Net. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mahanchian (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ISPs in Iran[edit]

I can see that you have created few articles for ISP's in Iran, most of which have been deleted or will be deleted because of notability issues. I suggest that you create just one article for ISP's in Iran with a "list of Iraninan ISPs". Mahanchian (talk) 10:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I agree with most of your argument and I appreciate your efforts. But I still do not see any point for creating one page for eash ISP even if they are the only ISP in a particular city or town. To add to my suggestions above, you can expand this list List_of_Internet_service_providers#Iran. Mahanchian (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kish Island[edit]

The page is protected due to the edit war, and I've opened a discussion on this at Talk:Kish Island. Thanks for making an effort to at least start the discussion. This was a pretty slow edit war - no talk page comments were made for at least a month. Khoi khoi 08:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, the process that should be followed is at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Although the users that have been removing the paragraph did not prove any initial explanation, this does not mean that their edits were not made in good faith. What I recommend now that a discussion has started, that everyone try to come to some middle ground. If a compromise can be achieved, the page will be unprotected. It appears that the other user involved has made a comment, so the discussion will most likely continue for the time being. If you and the three users achieve a consensus, then hopefully there will be no more edit wars. Khoi khoi 03:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. The problem was that one of the people involved in the dispute spammed a bunch of other others with a similar POV, and so a consensus was never really reached. But how about a compromise that we mention Levinson in the "see also" section, and remove the separate section on him. I'll make some changes to the article, please let me know what you think. Khoi khoi 01:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Down Under (song), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 09:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Operation Angel[edit]

I have nominated Operation Angel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Angel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pardis Technology Park for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pardis Technology Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardis Technology Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 19:15, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Damnetting[edit]

A tag has been placed on Damnetting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Araax[edit]

A tag has been placed on Araax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Issatis[edit]

A tag has been placed on Issatis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khoshkhabar[edit]

A tag has been placed on Khoshkhabar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Issatis[edit]

A tag has been placed on Issatis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:38, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mehran Network[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mehran Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Salar Online[edit]

A tag has been placed on Salar Online requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Resaneh[edit]

A tag has been placed on Resaneh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Refatek[edit]

A tag has been placed on Refatek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rain ISP[edit]

A tag has been placed on Rain ISP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moj-e Gooya Mazand[edit]

A tag has been placed on Moj-e Gooya Mazand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parsway[edit]

A tag has been placed on Parsway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pcom Network[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pcom Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:42, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soha Net[edit]

A tag has been placed on Soha Net requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sorenanet[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sorenanet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:43, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarasheh[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tarasheh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Torkanet[edit]

A tag has been placed on Torkanet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zagrosweb[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zagrosweb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zaman Group[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zaman Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 08:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rain ISP for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rain ISP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rain ISP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 20:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disappearance of Eloise Worledge for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Eloise Worledge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Eloise Worledge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Commking. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Commking. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]