User talk:Codenamewolf/Archive 1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, UserBk12! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 04:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan. - Arjayay (talk) 11:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How are the language percentages "unsourced" when I just corrected it and took the info from the demographics heading (which was sourced in the very same article)??? Wikipedia is usually full of "unsourced" info in lead of the article but referenced elsewhere in the body UserBk12 (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Codenamewolf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User Aman.kumar.goel reported me claiming I had been "warned" before for my edits, which is not true since I had been warned only for leaving out references in other articles. He reported me for my edits on the CPEC article which was already marked as too lengthy which is why I cut down its length by moving paragraphs in the body and removing commentary which did not read like an encyclopedia. I made over 30 edits and explained in most WHY I was editing them. He reverted all my edits claiming I did not "explain" my edits (not true). I reverted his edit for clear vandalism and edit warring without providing solid reasons. He also claimed ALL of my edits are disruptive which is not true. UserBk12 (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You received numerous warnings, which you read and removed from your talk page numerous times. Did you think we couldn't see the history of your talk page? Yamla (talk) 18:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I received ONE warning for leaving out a reference in article about Kashmir's population according to the recent census. (Which I edited again with a reference)

The second warning was ALSO from the same admin previously for leaving out a reference in a Pakistan article for language distribution. This time the source already existed in the body of the article which is why I didn't put a reference. The second warning was also for "unsourced" editing.

I was blocked completely for different reasons on the CPEC article because the edit warring user did not bother to read explanations in most of my 30 + edits and reverted EVERYTHING. I reverted back because I believe it is unfair to claim I didn't leave reasons for my edits and reported me for ONLY disruptive editing when he was the one actually being distruptive? UserBk12 (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully 40% of your edits have been deleted. Most of those on a highly promotional draft. The broad history of your editing does not lend itself to favorable view of your appeal. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is that relevant on the CPEC article edits and unfair blocking? I have been editing constructively for 2 years after that the trial and error from the early days of Wikipedia. Why never block me from the start and judge ALL of my 600+ edits? Judging on this particular article is not fair. UserBk12 (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not block you on the basis of any specific edit or article. I blocked you on the basis of your broad history. Convince me that you want to contribute constructively, will avoid promotional editing and understand the importance of properly citing claims of fact. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)-Ad Orientem (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do edit constructively which is why I've went over a year without a warning. Just check my edit history. I'm currently just interested in grammar correcting/sentence structuring, correcting vandalism and editing out incorrect info in the articles of my interest/or random ones I come across most of the time. The first promotional draft I made was regrettable and was made when I was not aware of Wikipedia's policies and decorum. After it was gone, I only started editing as a hobby.

I take warning very seriously. I responded to the first block warning for unsourced content by editing a reference. The second warning for unsourced content was not expected since it WAS sourced.

I should've received a warning for "distruptive" editing at least as claimed by the user who reported me so I could get a chance to correct my self.

I am an avid Wikipedia article reader now and have tried my best to correct and add to articles constructively. Kindly make the block temporary at least since I did not receive a relevant warning for being blocked as claimed the the user who reported me. This was very unexpected. UserBk12 (talk) 19:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I am going to unblock you per WP:ROPE. Be very careful in your editing going forward. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been unblocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your unrestrained edits at China-Pakistan Economic Corridor article[edit]

Talk:China–Pakistan Economic Corridor#Consider making modifications instead of outright deletion.

Moved to Talk:China–Pakistan Economic Corridor § Consider making modifications instead of outright deletion.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fatima Jinnah Content Award[edit]

The Fatima Jinnah Content Award

Awarded for outstanding edits to Muhajir-related articles!

Muhajir (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:UserBk12/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:UserBk12/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:UserBk12/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:UserBk12/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Muhajir (Pakistan) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 16:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm M.Ashraf333. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hafiz Naeem ur Rehman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaifi Khalil[edit]

The article Kaifi Khalil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails all possible criteria of WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 13:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaifi Khalil for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaifi Khalil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaifi Khalil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khushhal Khan (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nowshera. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hi Uzek! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Pakistan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Pakistan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 08:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One (explained) revert is no big deal. I am aware of the 3 revert policy Uzek (talk) 10:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Pakistan Muslim League (N): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks Uzek (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at WP:DRN, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

You are signing your posts to DRN with three tildes rather than four tildes. This resolves to your name but no datetime. The use of a datetime is very important in dispute resolution, because without it we cannot tell when you made a comment. Please begin using four tildes rather than three. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Hi, please indent your comments using collins (:) they move them ahead in the margin for a better presentation flow, use as per the requirement and break them with {{od}} (which starts a new line with a flow-through arrow) if the margin gets too large. Your signs also need to be signed with four tildes (~) for others to follow through when they were made i.e. with time, currently they appear spearately with a line break and no time. Thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 11:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Uzek (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious account[edit]

Hi Uzek I recently came across this account [1] they are restoring all the edits made by banned sock Prince of Roblox under the guise of reverting Satrar the original edits were made by the Roblox socks and this new account comes along to restore it with its only 12 days old and is already familiar with policy it's quite obvious it's a sock of Roblox please can you report? 119.160.96.33 (talk) 06:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2] both ValidYattoo and BomaiyukBatt are editing food related articles adding pro Indian pov to Kulfi this is obviously the same account! Use this in the spi report if you can. 119.160.96.33 (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is some more evidence the article on doodh pati [3] the Usual pattern of removing Pakistan and claiming the drink as Indian: [4] then he uses his other sock account to edit the same page again: [5] both accounts can be found on several articles with the same pro India pov such as the article on Kulfi has been completely vandalised and turned pro India. Its so obvious they are both the same user. 119.160.96.33 (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I'm not familiar much with this account's overall editing behaviour. Do recall coming across them once on the Kalash people article then reverting some of their subsequent problematic edits, until someone else reported them.

Think you're probably right as they do appear to have restored [6] an edit I reverted previously.

They have now been reported by another editor. Uzek (talk) 12:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Uzek thanks for responding Uzek but the BomaiyukBatt account has not been added to the suspected sock puppet list on the spi case I am 100% sure that BomaiyukBatt is a sock of Prince of Roblox as explained above if you add it to suspected sock puppets list we can nip this in the bud quickly otherwise it will turn into a sleeper account for Prince of Roblox to use and pov push with. 119.160.96.33 (talk) 14:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked up on them, they're now blocked. Uzek (talk) 00:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muhajir (Pakistan)[edit]

Hi, I noticed you added a disputed tag to Muhajir (Pakistan), can you please add a description of the dispute to talk page so other wikipedians can know about the dispute. FLA-ALP-1 (talk) 12:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It was based on the current dispute on the talk page and recent edit wars regarding content.

Added the tag because the article has too many contradictions and ambiguous content (though all sourced). Uzek (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove the tag once the dispute is over though. Uzek (talk) 15:17, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not uncontroversial page-moves[edit]

A quick glance at the history of Kalasha-mun Language reveals that it has been renamed over 10 (!) times, including move/move-back cycles. That's a good indication that any move is not a simple one, to do on one's own without discussion. Regardless of that perhaps oversight, even the name you chose seems contrary to MOS regardless of the merits of the idea. Why is "Language" capitalized? DMacks (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks Ohh. The move history visible to me only showed one move in December.

Think I should remove the word language altogether by initiating a new discussion? I just randomly clicked on the "move" option visible on the technical move request I made earlier and the page moved. Uzek (talk) 04:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to know to look with some special tricks on that one--had it watchlisted because of ethnic disruption on many related pages. I moved it back, as that had been a fairly stable name and based on a pointer to a piece of the MOS. I'm only taking an administrative role here, no prejudice against you or anyone else starting a move-request discussion to get it resolved once and for all. DMacks (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I've now started a new discussion for the move. Uzek (talk) 06:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The yeuzhi/ kushan link . pashtuns[edit]

Hi, Why the very important chengs Analysis plotemys and strabos description was removed? any reason? Like hephtalites there should be seperate topic and it (there was another scholars description too on this) should be reposted, i saw you were very active there so i wrote you. You can find it back in history section or maybe you had scene the article. Thats very important. Thank you! 92.220.51.19 (talk) 18:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:92.220.51.19 Don't know, I didn't remove it. You should go back to previous revisions and point out when it was removed and was present in the article on its talk page (with reliable references), maybe someone will readd it for you. Uzek (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again.

Sorry i searched alot the history section but was not lucky enough to find it. But i have an old version of the page where you can read it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pashtuns&oldid=113

Here is Both plotemys and strabos description and there analysis by josepph marquart and johnny cheung. I hope you re write it in a different section in a way you see it better. thank you. 92.220.51.19 (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:92.220.51.19 Opened the link and it says: "The revision #113 of the page named "Pashtuns" does not exist.

This is usually caused by following an outdated history link to a page that has been deleted. Details can be found in the deletion log."

From which year is this? If it's not recoverable, you would have to make an edit request and drop links to reliable references that speaks of such content on the talk page of the article, it will get re added. Uzek (talk) 19:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you can check 1st february page it is present in that date. Thank you. 92.220.51.19 (talk) 20:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:92.220.51.19 Just checked. The content has been moved from history to the "Etymology" section. Not deleted. Uzek (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i saw it! 92.220.51.19 (talk) 19:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock detected of Prince of Roblox[edit]

Hi Uzek this new account [[7]] is another prince of roblox sock account the typial pro India and anti Pakistan additions for example on [[8]] Hamida Pehalwan this edit is exactly the same as the old blocked account BoumaiyukBatt [[9]] and also here on Nankhatai [[10]] restoring there old banned accounts edit. looks like a duck quacks like one. Please add this to the investigation not sure why admins are taking so long to ban those accounts. 2A02:C7C:6782:7A00:459F:7E83:1617:DF40 (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added to list Uzek (talk) 21:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]