User talk:Clearfrienda/Archives/2022/February
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Karoll Marquez
Hi Clearfrienda,
I'm just dropping by as I saw this comment by another user at RSN. I was wondering why you rejected their proposed article on Karoll Marquez. The sources look reasonable to me, is there something I'm missing? While there are minor tone problems, the only thing I would say needs fixing immediately is to simply remove the word "renowned".
All the best.
Boynamedsue (talk) 19:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Boynamedsue: Hello! The article has since been improved; and, as I can see, it's probably (or getting very close to being) good to go. I've looked at the RS/N post, and the submitter had pointed out that I declined it when there were 35 references — I had actually declined it in July when there were only 12. While I still agree with my decision from then, I should have been more clear on where sources were needed and which were not reliable. Remember, this was a decline from July, when there weren't as many sources as there are now; now another reviewer has declined it, so if you're wondering about what the problem is now, ask them.
- Cheers, that's what I thought too, in terms of sourcing it now looks ok to me. At least, within the parameters of ok for many existing articles :) I didn't realise it had been reviewed since, I'll check with the more recent reviewer. All the best and thanks for your time.
- Boynamedsue (talk) 06:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)