User talk:Lauren at Chloe + Isabel

This is Lauren at Chloe + Isabel's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This template should be substituted on the article talk page. Have created a new draft in the user sandbox draft space ready for peer review.

Chloeandisabel (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Lauren[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloe + Isabel (March 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like an advertisement and needs in-line citations to support claims. Please also remove all peacock terms, e.g, Chloe + Isabel is a jewelry lifestyle brand and pioneer of social retail, dedicated to empowering the next generation of entrepreneurs through their unique opportunity in fashion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chloe + Isabel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Chloeandisabel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We strongly advise against people trying to write articles about the company they work for because it creates a conflict of interest. The drafts you've created have very promotional wording and would likely be deleted very quickly if you tried to move them to the article namespace. This is a guide written for people in your situation, if you're looking for advice. Hut 8.5 18:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloe + Isabel (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chloe + Isabel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloe + Isabel (July 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chloe + Isabel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 10:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated advertising never helps and especially when the page was still unchanged despite enough time for it therefore deletion is eminent as it it is now. Your company should be aware that we are not an extended webhost for companies and this is not a place for self-promoting. SwisterTwister talk 18:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To Lauren at Chloe + Isabel, I apologize for the above message from SwisterTwister. You haven't been "repeated advertising" as far as I can tell, and thank you for declaring your conflict of interest and changing your username to comply with our policies. You've been steadily improving the draft, and I know Chrissymad is also making attempts to improve it, as well. It may not still meet guidelines for notability, but it's close and we may be able to put it over the top. I apologize that this has been a struggle for you. We hope that you'll stick around and also choose to expand to editing other articles as well. SwisterTwister also opened a deletion discussion that you may want to contribute to. I have already voted keep, as has Chrissymad. I suspect others will as well. The deletion discussion can be found here, SwisterTwister was supposed to notify you, but did not. Best wishes. Waggie (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lauren at Chloe + Isabel/sandbox/Chloe + Isabel[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Lauren at Chloe + Isabel/sandbox/Chloe + Isabel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]