User talk:ChioBu

ChioBu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ChioBu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Dewan Rakyat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CMD (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Mr. Samerkov keeps reverting every one of my edits on Dewan Rakyat. Even after I have provided a source to back up my edits, he just reverts it without providing any source. He also calls me a supporter of a particular political party, despite the fact that Wikipedia is not a place for users to talk about their political beliefs. He evens accuses me of "always trying to provoke". His behaviour is clearly unacceptable on Wikipedia. ChioBu (talk) 05:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Fake news

No, that was a long time ago but PSB itself now don't work with them anymore.Mr. Samerkov (talk) 12:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Where's your source proving that? Please provide it if you have one. And July 2020 is not a long time ago. ChioBu (talk) 12:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Resolved ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). ChioBu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I did not violate the 3 revert rule. In fact, I provided a source to back up my edit. I also have no intention to make any further reverts after my 3rd one. On the other hand, Mr. Samerkov has failed to provide any source to back up his edits. He didn't respond to my request for him to do so. Moreover, he had been edit warring with another IP user before this, and he even personally attacked the other user https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qaidul&diff=986011987&oldid=980708418 . I shouldn't be blocked simply because Mr. Samerkov reported me. Also, I am not a sock puppet of the IP user as alleged by Mr. Samerkov. ChioBu (talk) 13:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Decline reason: Procedural decline only. You are not blocked for violating WP:3RR, you are blocked for violating WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ChioBu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry, I just realised that edit warring is wrong even if I do not violate the three revert rule. I promise I won't continue to make edits on that page from now on. Instead, I will discuss the issue on the article talk page with other the users involved to achieve dispute resolution. ChioBu (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Okay, no worries. Thanks. Since you explicitly and believably agree to discuss instead of reverting further, there is no longer a need for this block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Conflicts with Mr. Samerkov

Hi ChioBu,

first of all: If you had not intended to continue reverting at all, I'm sorry for the unnecessary block.

Regarding Mr. Samerkov, I have a feeling there will always be a conflict whenever you meet on Wikipedia. That's sad, but it can happen; some users don't work well together. The easiest way to deal with such a situation, if both users agree, is to avoid meeting each other on Wikipedia.

When necessary, so-called interaction bans can be created by consensus of the community, but in most situations, this is not necessary. Instead, you may like to try voluntarily avoiding interaction with Mr. Samerkov. If you see their name in the revision history of an article, you may like to avoid editing it at all. This can be frustrating first, but prevent a lot of stress in the long run.

You are not required to try this; you are welcome to discuss the conflict topic on the article's talk page. However, if there will never be an agreement anyway, I personally recommend disengaging from the conflict.

I will add the same message to Mr. Samerkov's talk page.

Thank you very much for considering this, and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)