User talk:Cepyita

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Cepyita, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Cepyita's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cepyita/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Cepyita/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cepyita! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Blogs and facebook are not reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Cepyita/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Cepyita/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shambhu moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Shambhu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shambhu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shambhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shambhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

@Cepyita:, Thanks for creating Burmese articles related to mythology. Burmese editors are very rare in En-wiki. Pls create more Burmese articles. I will help you if you need my help. Thanks Best Regards. Taung Tan (talk) 04:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cepyita: Hello bro, Wiki Commonsမှာပုံတင်တယ်ဆို copyrightရှိတယ်, FBတို့ YTတို့ကပုံတွေကို တင်လို့မရပါဘူး, ကာတွန်းပုံတွေဆို မူလဖန်တီးသူကိုယ်တိုင်က ခွင့်ပြုမှသာလျှင် OTRSနည်းနဲ့ တင်လို့ရနိုင်ပါမယ်, ဖျက်ခံနေရတာကို ခနခန ဇွတ်တင်မေဆိုရင် Commons မှာပုံတင်ခွင့် ပိတ်ခံရနိုင်ပါတယ်, wikiမှာက ကိုယ်တိုင် cameraနဲ့ ရိုက်ထားတဲ့ ပုံမှ အပကျန်တာ တင်ဖို့ မလွယ်ပါဘူး, စေတနာဖြင့် Taung Tan (talk) 13:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cepyita: အကောင့်အသစ်ဖွင့်လို့လုံးဝမဖြစ်ပါဘူးနော် wikiမှာကြီးမားဆုံးအပြစ်က အကောင့်၂ခုသုံးတာပါပဲ သူတို့ ရိပ်မိသွားရင် ၂ကောင့်လူံး ပိတ်ခံရမှာပါ လုံးဝပြန်လမ်းမဲ့ပါ, ပိတ်ခံရလို့ အသစ်ဖောက်လဲ သူတို့က သိနိုင်ပါတယ် ဘယ်လောက် ဖောက်ဖောက် သူတို့လက်ထဲကနေ ပုန်းလို့မရနိုင်ပါဘူး အဲ့မို့ အကောင့်ပိတ်ခံရလို့ မဖြစ်ဘူး အခု ၂ကောင့်ဖောက်ထားတာရှိရင် ယောင်လို့တောင်မဝင်မိပါစေနဲ့ သူတို့မှာ စစ်တဲ့toolတေရှိတယ် ဒီအကောင့်တခုပဲ ပုံသေသူံးပါ ၂ကောင့်သုံးလို့ ဘလော့ခံရရင် appealလို့ရနိုင်ပေမဲ့ မရရင် wikiမှာဘယ့တော့မှ editလို့ရမှာမဟုတ်ပါဘူး က်ုယ်တွေ့မို့ သတိပေးတာပါ Taung Tan (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Taung Tan: သတိပေးလို့ ကျေးဇူးအရမ်းတင်ပါတယ်၊ အစ်ကို၊၊ ကျနော်က Wikipedian ဖြစ်တာ သိပ်မကြာသေးလို့ exp မရှိသေးလို့ပါ၊၊ အခုမှ ပေါ်လစီတွေ၊ နည်းလမ်းတွေ၊ စနစ်တွေ စလေ့လာနေဆဲပါ။ အခုမှ မထင်မှတ်ထားဘဲ ပထမဆုံးBlockခံရတာပါ။ ကျနော်မှားသွားမှန်းလည်း သိလိုက်ပါတယ်။ btw..အစ်ကို၊ OTRS ဆိုတာ ဘာကိုပြောတာလဲခမျ၊ ပြီးတော့ wikicommons မှာ ကိုယ်ကိုယ်တိုင်ဆွဲထားတဲ့ art ပုံတွေကိုရောတင်လို့ရလားဗျ။ နောက်အခက်အခဲရှိရင်လည်း လာမေးကြည့်ပါမယ်ဗျာ၊ လေးစာစွာဖြင့်၊ --Cepyita (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bodawpaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Badon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bodawpaya, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

အကြောင်းအရာသစ်တွေ ပေါင်းထည့်တော့မယ်ဆိုရင် reliable source ကနေ ယူထားကြောင်း reference ပါ ထည့်ပေးပါ။ သမိုင်းနဲ့ပတ်သက်တဲ့ ဆောင်းပါးတွေမှာ ရှေ့ဆရာတွေ ထည့်ထားတဲ့ ပုံတွေကို မဖယ်ပစ်ပါနဲ့။ ကာတွန်းပုံတွေနဲ့လဲ အစားမထိုးပါနဲ့။ Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Anawrahta, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Anawrahta the Great ဆိုပြီးတော့ ကိုယ့်ထင်မြင်ချက်တစ်ခုတည်းနဲ့ သွားမပြင်ပါနဲ့။ reliable secondary source တွေမှာ သုံးထားရဲ့လား အရင် သွားရှာပါ။ တခြား editor တစ်ယောက်က လာပြင်သွားတယ်ဆိုရင်လဲ edit summary မှာ သူ့ယူဆချက်ကို ဘာရေးသွားလဲ သွားကြည့်ပါ။ သူပြင်သွားတဲ့ဟာကို ပြန်ဖျက်ပြီး ပြန်မပြင်ပါနဲ့။ Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinthe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 10:52, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Giving advice[edit]

WikiProject Myanmar မှာ စိတ်ဝင်တစား ဝင်ရောက်ရေးသားပေးတဲ့အတွက် ကျေးဇူးတင်ပါတယ်။ သမိုင်းဆောင်းပါးတွေမှာ တည်းဖြတ်ထားတာတွေ အတော်များများ ကျွန်တော် restore ပြန်လုပ်လိုက်ပါတယ်။ အဓိကအကြောင်းရင်း နှစ်ချက်ကတော့

မိမိရဲ့ ထင်မြင်ချက်တွေကို စိတ်ထင်သလို ဝင်ဖြည့်သွားခြင်း၊ (ဝီကီက Original research များ လက်မခံပါ။)
နဂိုထည့်သွင်းထားတဲ့ ရုပ်ပုံတွေနေရာမှာ အင်တာနက်ကရှာတွေ့တဲ့ ကာတွန်းပုံတွေကို ပြောင်းထည့်သွားခြင်းတို့ကြောင့် ဖြစ်ပါတယ်။

ဝီကီက ကိုယ်တိုင်ရိုက်ပုံတွေနဲ့ (မြန်မာ့မူပိုင်ခွင့်ဥပဒေအရ) လွန်ခဲ့တဲ့ နှစ်ငါးဆယ်ကျော်က ပုံတွေသာ တင်သင့်ပါတယ်။ စာအုပ်အဖုံး စသည် commons မှာ တင်လို့မရပါ။ ပုံတွေနဲ့ ပတ်သက်ပြီး မူဝါဒတွေကို Myanmar Wikipedia Facebook group မှာ Ko Kyi Phyo Htet ကနေ တင်ပေးထား၊ တင်ပေးနေပါတယ်။ သွားဖတ်ကြည့်လို့ရပါတယ်။

ကျန်တာကတော့ အခုမှ အသစ်ဆိုတော့ ဖြစ်တတ်တာ နားလည်ပါတယ်။ များများ edit လုပ်ရင်း နားလည်သွားပါလိမ့်မယ်။

နောက်တစ်ခုက ရှေ့မှာ Taung Tan လဲ ပြောပြီးပါပြီ။ အကောင့်နောက်တစ်ခုထပ်ဖွင့်ထားတာ တွေ့ပါတယ်။ အဲဒီအကောင့်ကို လုံးဝဝင်မသုံးပါနဲ့တော့။ ကျွန်တော်တောင် အခု ခဏလေးနဲ့ တွေ့သွားတာ၊ အထက်က တာဝန်ရှိသူတွေက ကျွန်တော့်ထက် ပိုလျင်ပါတယ်။ မိရင်မလွယ်ပါဘူး။

ကြုံတုန်းဆက်ပြောချင်တာက ဝီကီမှာ မူပိုင်ခွင့်မရှိတာ၊ ဘယ်သူမဆို ယူသုံးနိုင်တာ မှန်ပါတယ်။ သို့သော် ကျွန်တော့် User page က ကော်ပီယူထားတာ အတော်များနေသလိုပဲ။ User page က individually unique ဖြစ်သင့်တယ်လို့ ထင်ပါတယ်။ ပြီးတော့ ပုံစံတူနေရင် နောက်အကောင့် ဖွင့်ထားတယ်လို့လဲ အထင်ခံရနိုင်ပါတယ်။ အဲဒီအခါကျ သူတို့နဲ့ ပြောရဆိုရ အလုပ်ရှုပ်ပါတယ်။ ဖြစ်နိုင်ရင် ကိုယ်ပိုင် style နဲ့ user page တစ်ခု ဖန်တီးသင့်ပါတယ်။ User page design center ကို ဝင်ကြည့်နိုင်ပါတယ်။ ကျေးဇူးပါ။ Zin Win Hlaing (talk) 13:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

မှန်ပါတယ် သမိုင်းဆောင်းပါးတွေကို အလွယ်တကူပြင်လို့မရပါဘူး ဘာလို့လဲဆိုတော့ ဒါတွေကို refယူနေတဲ့ ကျောင်းသားတွေ mediaတေလဲရှိနေလို့ပါ, အရင်ကဆို သမိုင်းဆောင်းတွေကို Senior editorတွေက စောင့်ကြည့်အကဲဖြတ်ပါတယ်, အခုသူတို့ မရှိတော့ပါဘူး နိုင်ငံရေး ကိုဗစ်နဲ့ ပျောက်ကုန် အနားယူကုန်ပါပြီ, စီစစ်မဲ့သူ လစ်လပ်နေပါတယ်, အဓိပ္ပာယ်လေး နဲနဲမှားတာနဲ့ ဖတ်သွားသူကလဲ အချက်လက်လွဲကိုပဲ သိသွားစေမှာပါ, ဒါကြောင့် သမိုင်းဆိုင်ရာဆောင်းပါးတွေကို အကဲမဖြတ်နဲ့လို့မပြောလိုပါ အကဲဖြတ်ရင်လဲ sourceထည့်ပေးပါ, တခြားဆောင်းပါးတွေဆို ဒီလောက် ပြသနာမရှိပါဘူး, နောက်ပီး Pagan Kingdomလို ဆောင်းပါးကြီးတစ်ခုကို မိမိအမြင် မိမိသဘောတခုထဲနဲ့ Bagan Kingdom အမည်သို့ ရွေ့လို့မရပါဘူး, Community discussion ခေါ်ပြီး မဲခွဲပြီးမှ adminကဆုံးဖြတ်မှာပါ, အခု ကျွနိုပ်ကတော့ ကုန်းဆောင်ခေတ်က မိဘုရားတွေအကြောင်းရေးသားဖို့ ပြင်နေပါတယ် စိတ်ဝင်စားရင် ဝင်joinဖို့ ဖိတ်ခေါ်ပါတယ် 😊 ကျေးဇူးပါ Taung Tan (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zin Win Hlaing:,@Taung Tan:အကြံပေးတဲ့ ညီအစ်ကိုတွေအကုန်လုံးကို ကျေးဇူးအရမ်းတင်ပါတယ်။ ကျနော်လည်းသင်ခန်းစာအတော်ရသွားပြီဗျာ။ အခုကစပြီး reliable sourceတွေကနေပဲ ဆက်ရေးပါတော့မယ်။ အရင်က wikipedia မှာ မြန်မာ pageတွေကို ဘယ်သူမှမဖတ်၊စိတ်မ၀င်စားဘူးလို့ ထင်ခဲ့တာ။ အခုတော့ လူတွေသေချာရှိနေသားပဲနော်၊ ကျနော်လည်း အားတက်သွားပြီဗျာ၊ စီနီယာComrade တွေရှိနေသေးတော့၊ နောက်ကျ သိချင်တာရှိရင် လာမေးမယ်နော်၊--Cepyita (talk) 18:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hteehlaing moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Hteehlaing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hteehlaing[edit]

Hello, Cepyita. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hteehlaing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list[edit]

Hi Cepyita! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]