User talk:Bull-Doser/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Radio station formats

Please refrain from introducing original research, as you have done in several instances on radio station articles, most recently here. Mediabase 24/7 should be considered the official source for format classifications for stations that are monitored. Just because Station X may have made a certain adjustment to the number of spins on their top songs, that does not mean that they have changed or adjusted formats. Thanks! Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 16:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Once again, I must ask you to refrain from introducing original research, as you did on WKRZ and WXRK, per the rationale that I provided above. Thanks! Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 03:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the pix

Thanks for updating the i-MiEV picture on Hydro-Québec. Since you obviously were present at the last MIAS, I was wondering if you had a general picture of the show to feature on Montreal International Auto Show (one with crowds or a general picture of the setup). Cheers. Bouchecl (talk) 05:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

RE: Your edit to KWYL

Per Mediabase, all three stations - KLCA, KWNZ, and KWYL - are CHR/Pop. You continue to draw conclusions based on original research that you can not cite. Please stop changing the formats of radio stations without a reliable source. I daresay - given what I do for a living - that I might just be a bit more of a qualified editor in this field than you are. If you can provide a reliable source to support your conclusions, that's great, but without a source, it's OR and it's not permissible. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 22:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

CKX-TV

Hi. I've reverted your edit to CKX-TV claiming that the license has been revoked. While I do believe a revocation is inevitable, I've yet to see a CRTC decision about this (and any time a license revocation happens, the CRTC issues a decision on it, even if it's a very short one indicating they merely approved what amounts to simply handing the license back in)—and no other source was given. (Then again, REC, and thus Industry Canada records, does seem to show that all that exists of CKX-TV are digital allocations (the only "CKX" that doesn't meet that criteria is radio station CKX-FM), but the CRTC's silence is unusual; when CHCA-TV, another Canadian television station that closed in 2009, was revoked, there was a decision that said so. But CHCA does not appear as such in REC/IC records at all anymore, so it's apparent that CKX-TV still exists on paper somehow, but perhaps solely as the as-yet-unbuilt CKX-DT.) You'll have to cite a source for the CKX-TV revocation claim if you re-add the it to the article. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Rogers adult contemporary stations in Northern Ontario

Hi there, I didn't know that CJMX-FM is still listed as adult contemporary through mediabase so I am going to list CHAS-FM, CHUR-FM and CKGB-FM back to adult contemporary from hot adult contemporary and the same goes for the List of radio stations in Ontario. The reason why I listed them as hot ac is because the music has more like a hot ac feel to it with the "Today's Best Music" slogan. Webfan29 (talk) 02:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

CFTM/CFMT

Hey, just to note that as of 11:05am today, CFTM-TV Montreal is still analog. Maybe you meant CFMT Toronto is switching to digital? InMontreal (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1990 Stanza.JPG

A tag has been placed on File:1990 Stanza.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding original research statements to articles

Hello. As an established editor, I am not going to template you, but I am going to ask you to stop adding original research statements to articles about radio stations. While some of your edits as of late may have been technically accurate, you (nor anyone else) can not support those edits with reliable sources. For example, saying that KHHM can not be a CHR because a market "can't have three of the same format" is wrong. There is nothing written anywhere that says a certain market is limited to two of any given format. Any further edits that are purely original research may be considered vandalism and reverted (as well as reported, if it gets to that point) as such. I've taken a look at your edit history and your work with car articles looks very good.. just have to improve on the radio station front :) Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 00:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I have commented previously (see my notes above of July 14, July 27, August 8, and September 22) about your tendency to add original research to articles about radio stations and made fair warning that continuing the habit of doing so may result in those edits being considered vandalism. As such, this warning. Sorry. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 02:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Photo error

Your photo, File:'54 Mercury Monterey Convertible (Auto classique Laval '11).JPG, is not a 1954 Mercury, it is a 1957 Mercury Turnpike Cruiser(notice the turn signals above the headlights). Please fix!--Rockclaw1030 (talk) 23:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Villager 1996-98.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Villager 1996-98.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Villager 1996-98.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Villager 1996-98.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

WLER-FM

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to WLER-FM. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. PLEASE stop adding original research to radio station articles. The simple fact that station X is one format does not in any way, shape, or form mean that station Y can not be that format. It doesn't work that way. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 03:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

WWFS format

My contention of the format being Mainstream AC is supported by two reliable sources - Mediabase 24/7 and the corporate website of CBS Radio. I have suggested (twice now) that you see the WWFS talk page in order to participate in a discussion toward reaching consensus. As I am well aware of the limits of 3RR, I will not be reverting you again, but I will not hesitate to report you, should you revert without participating in the discussion that I have begun on the article's talk page. Your efforts on this front, as well as your continued insistence in adding original research to articles (namely, stating that station X can not be a certain format because station(s) Y and/or Z are that format in the same market or that their sister station, sister station J, is one thing, so station X must be the same) leads me to believe that this subject (radio stations) may not be one that you should be editing within. Please make sure that your additions are supported by reliable sources. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 04:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Carrefour Langelier

Hello Bull-Doser, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Carrefour Langelier-- It would be great if you could also Wikify the related article Place LaSalle (Montreal).

Happy editing! Hope your day is going well and you are having fun. Jipinghe (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at WWFS, you may be blocked from editing. Please STOP adding original research to radio station articles. Even IF your conclusion(s) is/are correct, in theory, you have yet to provide a verifiable reference supporting that/those conclusion(s) in a single article in which I have reverted you. If you do not stop adding OR to radio station articles, you may leave me with no choice but to pursue further action, possibly including a topic ban against you. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 00:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Centre Commercial Forest, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Farine (talk) 06:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at WSSR, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 22:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

IFCAR's photos

I'm sure IFCAR is more than capable of inserting his own images into articles where appropriate. It is getting very annoying having to revert (no joke) half of your edits because you seem to assume that just because the image is newer it therefore must be better. I generally find IFCAR's judgement of image quality to be spot on, so can we leave this up to him to do please? Regards, OSX (talk • contributions) 01:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Also, while you're on your self-improvement kick:

1. If you do change an image, also change the caption as necessary.

2. Try and make a change in one edit rather than two. IFCAR (talk) 02:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

And you're still doing it. Another four articles today. OSX (talk • contributions) 09:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Right down to two-edits-per-change and leaving the old captions in place. IFCAR (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey, wake up!

I was uploading an improved version of a picture of yours (File:'81 Buick LeSabre (Auto classique Bellepros Vaudreuil-Dorion '11).JPG) when I realized that your Commons talkpage is overflowing with messages regarding the deletion of various pictures of yours. It might be worth it to check out your Commons account every so often to keep track of what's happening over there; I would hate to lose some of your photos for no reason. Cheers,  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 09:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Vehicle pictured is not a Triumph TR250

The vehicle in the photograph you uploaded to the Triumph TR250 page is a Triumph Herald. It is not a Triumph TR250. The TR250 had the same body as the TR4. The main difference was the engine. It also had a stripe that ran horizontally across the front of the hood and down the fenders on either side. (See the photo by Simon Clay that also appears in the TR250 article.)

Please remove this photograph from the Wikipedia TR250 page. Thanks. MJRTOM (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Place Versailles. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Farine (talk) 07:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Galeries d'Anjou with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Farine (talk) 05:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Plaza Côte-des-Neiges, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

WIYY

This needs to stop. If you continue to add original research to radio stations to make a POINT, you will be blocked. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk to User:Strikerforce. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Don't need to. Stop now. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Similar editing pattern at WMMS. Also lacking any sources.  Levdr1lostpassword  (talk) 05:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Another one was done at KJLH when the User:SanDiegoCa listed the station as urban contemporary, but they're not. By Arbitron, Mediabase & Nielsen BDS, KJLH is an urban AC. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 06:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

There isn't any musical difference between Urban Contemporary and Urban Adult Contemporary. Seriously. It's like comparing McIntosh Apples with Rome Apples. Same damned red apple, just a different name. It's symantics and you are trying to create a reason so you can put unsourced information into radio station pages. Ain't gonna happen. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 08:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Late to the party on this, but in defense of BD, there is a difference between Urban and Urban AC. UAC tends to lean much harder on recurrents and gold than Urban, much like the difference between Hot AC and AC. However, other parts of his edit history do - in my opinion - justify the block issued below. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 05:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Cavendish Mall, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Chilis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bull-Doser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I hate being unblocked. Please, I don't wanna be blocked. I will always add references!

Decline reason:

You hate to be unblocked ... err, what? Ok, so I will not unblock you. After all - based on your comment below, you do not understand the range of things that have led to your block. Read every single warning that you have been provided on this page, and amend your actions accordingly (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wait! Even though this block is temporary, I don't need it as of yet. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 06:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mercedes-Benz C215, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page V12 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Picture Nissan NX

Got my password back. Can you please explain why you changed the picture to the original one? We as NX-owners think that the red NX fits the article better, and that this new picture was an improvement to the article. Kind regards. LJVerkade (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect Vehicle Identification / Picture Posting

Please remove your picture on this page [1] as it is not an e21 3 Series limo, it is an e12 5 Series limo. You should also change your identification of it at this address [2] since it is not correct. The key styling points that show this is an e12 and not an e21 are the turn indicators being in the fender (they are located in the grilles of the e21 between the headlights and the fender) and the vents at the rear of the hood line (e21's have slats integrated into the hood, not separate plastic grills like in the picture). This information is available anywhere that talks about the styling of both vehicles, you should have researched before posting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.105.195.146 (talk) 21:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited BMW 5 Series (E12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosslyn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Imperial (automobile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freightliner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Carrefour Angrignon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Farine (talk) 03:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I really appreciate your image additions but...

I don't want to do anything to discourage you from adding images. I've personally added many of your images myself (too many to count). But I find it irritating when you insert an image without seemingly have read the text. A lot of effort went into the words. Please respect the words, as much as I respect your images. Sadowski (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

By the way I REALLY need a 1941 Oldsmobile 98 image, preferably a 4-door convertible. It would really kick off the Olds 98 page. If that were to happen I would feel enervated to completely rewrite the page with references. Sadowski (talk) 10:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't know how you go about your business but I must say the following. Although I often reject your additions (I also often add them before you do) I often find some of them incredibly indispensible. Wikipedia is in desperate need of Oldsmobile 98 images. I know the cars are rare. But they are very interesting. Sadowski (talk) 00:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Please tone down the unusual exposures. I think a more simple approach to car photography would be much more acceptable as well as be more interesting. Believe it or not a nice simple three-quarter regular exposure shot is highly desirable (and seemingly extremely hard to come by).

P.P.S. As much as I have opposed you, I also support your efforts.

Subaru Forester

The 2009 model actuall is a midsize crossover. If you go here: http://www.vehix.com/car-reviews/2009/subaru/forester/vehicle-specifications you will see that the total interior volume is 145.1 cubic feet. And if you go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_size_class you will realize that it falls in the midsize wagon category, as the midsize wagon is 130-160 cubic feet. Bookster451 (talk) 02:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

As I was looking for a picture of a pontiac parisienne 78 on google to show my friend what kind of car my roomate drives... I found out you took a picture of her car in the street of Montreal; she confirmed it's hers (with the little jesus on the dash) what a pleasant surprise :) Marcottas (talk) 03:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabrielle Destroismaisons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabrielle Destroismaisons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Subaru Outback

You can't just revert major edits to pages. There were two sections on the talk pages, and many others agreed to merge the outback into impreza and legacy, respectively. Bookster451 (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cadillac Escalade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GMC Yukon

Fisker Karma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sedan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at WEZF, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding your own conclusions that are unable to be referenced to any verifiable third-party source to radio station articles. I, along with at least one other editor, have asked you to stop doing this in the past. Strikerforce^{Talk Review me!} 22:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

CHMP-FM

I have removed a series of details you've added in parentheses[3] [4] [5] because they are completely irrelevant to the article. In the future, please include only informations that are necessary to the articles.

I noticed that you've received a lot of notices over the past couple of years and most recently a block on December 2011 for your disruptive edits. Despite this, there's been no progress on you part. If this behavior continue, we may have to consider either a long term block and/or a ban on some topics.

Thank you. Farine (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I`ve Been Blocked For The First Time!

Hi, I promise not to do any rumours on Wikipedia. Please unblock me from Wikipedia! What did I do wrong to block me? -- Bull-Doser (talk) 12:33, 8 January 2010 (Eastern)

I did NOT make the InkHeart account! -- 12:39, 8 January 2010 (Eastern)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. When you recently edited 2010 Winter Olympics torch relay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langley, British Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

5th Gen Honda Accord SiR Pictures

hey, why did you delete the pictures I posted up for the 5th gen accord SiR? there was no picture of an SiR trim line for that section... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DasWolf (talk • contribs) 03:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Honda_Accord_(1993) might have 'em. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Place Greenfield Park

I have reverted your edits on this page.

As someone living in Saint-Hubert in the 1980s and 1990s, I know this mall well enough to know that the informations you've wrote are inaccurate. And I can clearly tell that you've edited this page based on what you thought was the "most likely possible scenario" instead of researching thoroughly the history of the mall. While some of the things you wrote on the article is true, the vast majority isn't and gives the impression that you were editing through wild guessing.

Therefore, your edits have been reverted and it will stay that way until you start editing based on facts rather than by your own assumptions and perception. I could have corrected the incorrect infos but they were so many maistakes than I just thought it would be better to revert all your edits for now and to start from skratch.

Also please note that although Greenfield Park is now part of the city of Longueuil, "Greenfield Park" is what should be displayed on the infobox since Canada Post never changed the addresses of Greenfield Park. Thank you. Farine (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Mercedes-Benz W136, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

WSNE-FM

WSNE-FM is not part of the Boston DMA. It may show up in the ratings there, but they are not a subscriber to the Boston ratings book, nor part of the Boston MSA. In the future, to see what market a radio station belongs to, use this lookup tool which shows market listings per market. A couple of other notes, while the station is licensed to Taunton, the actual transmitter is in Rehoboth, at the tower farm used by the Providence broadcasters. Yes, the signal does get into Boston, but so do signals from New Hampshire (WZID), Cape Cod (WCIB) and Worcester (WSRS), that doesn't define them as Boston stations. So with respect to WSNE-FM, it is not a Boston radio station. Please do not re add WSNE to the Boston market listing, it doesn't belong there. NECRAT^{Speak to me} 01:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Zellers

Please do not use the defunct infobox template on the article until ALL stores have closed in 2013. Until Zellers closes its very last store on March 31, 2013, it logically isn't a defunct chain. And since it won't be a defunct chain until March 31, 2013, you can't use that template until that date. Thank you. Farine (talk) 04:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Place Rosemère, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxi (supermarket) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)