User talk:Bibliophilen
Welcome[edit]
|
Proposed deletion of Route Bell[edit]
The article Route Bell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability: it's a street. We don't need a WP article for every street in the world which is named after a notable person. Mention it on the page for the person, and possibly the location, but there's nothing to justify a WP article here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 09:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Route Bohr[edit]
The article Route Bohr has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability: it's a street. We don't need a WP article for every street in the world which is named after a notable person. Mention it on the page for the person, and possibly the location, but there's nothing to justify a WP article here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 09:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Streets in CERN[edit]
Category:Streets in CERN, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 09:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- I see that the category has now been converted into an article, Streets in CERN, preserving the text and refs you provided (which didn't really fit into a category definition page). You might like to add the info from the two deleted articles listed above, and other named streets. This article could reasonably include a list of the main named streets, with brief info (eg "French physicist (1801-1851)") on the people they're named after and links to their articles, and have incoming redirects from the street names. PamD 22:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Little European Bubble Chamber[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Little European Bubble Chamber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://cds.cern.ch/record/1719200/files/10-1980-p001.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 11:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
LExan Bubble Chamber[edit]
Some days ago the article "LExan Bubble Chamber" was deleted. In the meantime CERN has released the paper which was claimed copied under CC-BY. This is not reflected on the PDF itself, but on in the corresponding cataloguing record: <https://cds.cern.ch/record/1719200/export/hm?ln=en>
I have also made some edits to the original file.Bibliophilen (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
LEBC[edit]
The missing page LExan Bubble Chamber has been fixed and reinstalled.Bibliophilen (talk) 22:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bubble chamber into 30 cm Bubble Chamber (CERN). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 00:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for flagging this - will have it fixed over the weekend.Bibliophilen (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please don't blindly put everything into that category that has a relation to CERN, and do not include articles that are in suitable subcategories (especially the LHC category) already. The category should only have articles about CERN and about things that are directly at CERN, part of CERN, organized by CERN or similar, and that don't fit better in subcategories. --mfb (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:European Hybrid Spectrometer[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "European Hybrid Spectrometer".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 13:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Compact Linear Collider, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductivity, Scintillation and Emittance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
October 2019[edit]
Your addition to List of presidents of the CERN Council has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen
Thank you for creating Bent Stumpe.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Could really use a few more sources if you can find them.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 18:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear @Insertcleverphrasehere:,
rely on me, I plan to expand this article further with many independent sources.
Bibliophilen (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- 👍 — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 18:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2020[edit]
Your addition to Irradiation Facility (CERN) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Irradiation Facility (CERN)[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen,
Thank you for creating Irradiation Facility (CERN).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The term irradiation facility is not mentioned in the text, it should be in the lead sentence.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Thanks for your feedback, I will work on it tomorrow. The page looked diiferen, buty then some text was taken out—apprently for copyright reasons. However, I think I shall be able to find similar texts under a CC-BY license.
Caution[edit]
I notice you've been adding the names of notable faculty to universities. Please note that one source is plenty to support your text. When you add multiple sources it looks like link-spam (where links to a person are surreptitiously added to promote those links on Google searches). Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
You are right—I overdid it. Thanks for having cleaned it up. Bibliophilen (talk)
Speedy deletion nomination of Victoria Grossack[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Victoria Grossack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lettlerhello 14:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC) I am not sure what can have happend—the address of the page I created now points to the biography of her husband Johann Rafelski. This was certainly not the intention. Was this what you saw or did you see the page I created?
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Bibliophilen
Thank you for creating Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks.
User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi there! I'm uncertain that Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks is notable under WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Could you provide some evidence that it is?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Sam-2727 (talk) 21:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 05:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sam @Sam-2727: thanks for having started the verification process of my article concerning the book Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks. Please appreciate that this book is a niche title that has reached readers far outside of the small community of scientists working in the field of particle nuclear physics. Looking to the publishers website <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-17545-4>, you will see that it has 185 000 chapter downloads—a figure that has significantly raised over the last few months. The book is a so-called open access monograph, so people do not have to purchase it. When the publisher is calculating so-called "sold book equivalents", this is done by dividing the number of downloads by the number of chapters, which results in more than 5000 copies—a figure that is a factor 10 higher than what any good book (only text books reaches such popularity)in our field normally reaches over its total lifetime.
The book has a citation record <https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=18164520303342039826,10778867980815526167,9024884750278181032> (where I observe some self citations by the author, but not beyond normal), which I believe is to be considered as good given the niche topic.
So in my view this is a notable book: - it is an early open access book showing the way for other authors/publishers - it has proved to be popular reading - it shed light on an scientific subject that remains of interest for the community
It is just a matter of fact that scientific books—not text books— often are niche, so possibly there should be other criteria for such books to be listed in Wikpedia?
Best regards Bibliophilen (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Particle physics journals[edit]
Hi, thank you for your efforts to improve categorization of journal articles. However, you should not add the "particle physics journals" to journals such as Physical Review Letters solely because they also publish particle physics. Such journals go into the more general category "physics journals". Only journals that specialize in particle physics should be in the "particle physics journals" category. Similarly, redirects from abbreviations or initialisms (such as JHEP) should not be categorized (but only tagged as "redirect from abbreviation" or "redirect from initialism). I would appreciate if you could go through your recent edits and correct where necessary. Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Randykitty,
- I see your point. When doing it my idea was to create a category that would list the main journals in which particle physicists publish, including the main broad band journals such as Physical Review Letters, which by many is considered one of the most important journals in the field. However, I would not include Nature (even if particle physicists also to some extent publish there), as they publish little in the discipline. The reason for having included redirects from abbreviations or initialisms (such as JHEP) is just because that "everyone" in the field will use this name in place of Journal of High Energy Physics.
- I will re-vist my edits and hope that I will make you happy :-)
- ~~~ Bibliophilen (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
November 2021[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- OK. I will be more careful.
- ~~~ Bibliophilen (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nicknames compared to Experiment Names[edit]
Why is AD-1 not on the list of CERN experiments? Madeleinehales (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was User:Pppery not liking it (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AD-1_experiment&action=history), let's bring up the discussion.
- ~~~ Bibliophilen (talk) 15:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is already in the category under the full name (ATHENA experiment). It makes no sense to include both a redirect and its target in the same category. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Bjarne Stugu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bjarne Stugu for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjarne Stugu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hi Bibliophilen. Thank you for your work on Ben Segal (computer scientist). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks.
- ~~~ Bibliophilen (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)