User talk:BhaiSaab/A7

	Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6

Arbitration[edit]

Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab ^talk 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think about how it makes people feel. Fred Bauder 04:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Template[edit]

Nice job on Template:Islam by country.

thanks but please help me in filling out the red links7day 11:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

Are you going to merge the muslim guild tonight or tomorrow? Dev920 (Please peer review here.) 15:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Guild is still there. Would you like me to merge it for you? Please let me know and I'd be happy to do so. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 14:51, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note from Muhammad mediation[edit]

Hi there, I am just dropping you a note because you signed up to participate at Talk:Muhammad/Mediation. We have not heard from you since we started discussing proposed criteria for including images, so I'm just asking whether you plan to participate further. If so, we need you to agree or disagree to the criteria we have developed. Important note: The criteria will be used only if the group decides to include images, which will be later in the mediation. Agreeing to the criteria does not mean that you agree to including any images. Thanks! --Aguerriero (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology[edit]

You have my apology for making those statements on Talk:Indian caste system. I'm striking them out.Hkelkar 03:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BS?[edit]

You do realize that I will check your "Muslim Connunities ref." right?

http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=000355470&loc_display_type=V http://utdirect.utexas.edu/lib/utnetcat/full.WBX?search_type=FL&search_text=MUSLIM+COMMUNITIES+OF+SOUTH+ASIA+CULTURE+AND+SOCIETY&next_action=N&next_record_brn=008360060&loc_display_type=V

Might want to consider your edits.Hkelkar 04:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24 hr block for revertwarring on Indian caste system[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Rama's arrow 13:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Advocacy[edit]

Hi - ideally, we're there to advise one party, so yes, we're like a lawyer in that repsect. However, at times we try to seek compromises, which ends up with us being more like mediators. Hopefully this answers your question. M a rtinp23 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfaR[edit]

See User_talk:Bakasuprman/Majorcontributors, you've edited my talk page more times than Hkelkar and subhash_bose combined.Bakaman _Bakatalk 16:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence in dispute[edit]

BhaiSaab, could you please let me know the sentences in dispute. A link would be enough. Thanks --Aminz 01:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BhaiSaab please have a look at this:

http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0887069185&id=UyrTm4k29UMC&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116&vq=nasab&dq=Advice+on+the+art+of+governance,an+Indo-Islamic+Mirror+for+Princes&sig=_awYsO_kucOslCLofwr74agrprQ

This is Hklekar's source. --Aminz 02:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source is presenting the view of some medieval Indian Muslim scholars. --Aminz 02:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrator[edit]

I thought you were some random user and I was about to tell you not to respond to my statements on the case page but then I noticed that you're a part of Arbcom, lol. I have responded to one of your proposed decisions. BhaiSaab ^talk 22:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion is valid and right. However, I would rather have users understand that I meant Israel as a political entity rather than the people of Israel, considering I've already made the statement. BhaiSaab ^talk 04:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but be sure to check out these statements as well. BhaiSaab ^talk 05:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the other arbitrators? Why are you the only one working? BhaiSaab ^talk 15:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am just the advance party. However I usually am the only one who uses the /Workshop page. I like it because it gives people a chance to give some feedback. Fred Bauder 18:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

I have given you a warning like this before here. But you don't seem to get the point. Was there any need to make this very intelligent comment. This is your last warning. I will block you if you make one more remark like that on any talk page. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know any encyclopedia or wiki is not considered as a reliable source. I will have check on that and let you know. And 2 wrongs do not make a right. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have confirmed with other admins and it looks like Encyclopedia of Islam is a reliable source. So that is my bad. I apologise. But my earlier warning still stays. It would do you well not to retort to every comment made by Hkelkar. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like our messages crossed. Yes. I was the one misinformed here. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is the root of the problem. Don't get upset. It's easy once you get the hang of it. I thought you would be the last person to get upset by things he does. - Aksi_great (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR and talk[edit]

See Talk:Antisemitism#My revert.

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 05:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please self revert BhaiSaab. Please! --Aminz 05:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BhaiSaab, please self revert --Aminz 05:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a report here [1] --Aminz 05:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Self-revert BhaiSaab, this is an order :P --Aminz 06:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Aminz 06:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's chat offline. --Aminz 06:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you use yahoo messenger? --Aminz 06:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i.e. Is there any way to chat online? :) --Aminz 06:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:NinaEliza has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! NinaEliza

check this out[edit]

[[2]]

== == Don't feed the troll!NinaEliza 09:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC) == ==[reply]

One last time[edit]

I will only converse with you on wikipedia.Do not contact me by any other means.Hkelkar 17:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sayed, don;t harass me off wikipedia or this will become a police case. I am warning you.Hkelkar 17:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don;t waste my time. Read a book.Hkelkar 18:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creates the first true Bose-Einstein Condensate,Quantum Computing,Quantum optics, Mesotechnology, verifies some theoretical models. Cold Atoms are tunable systems and can be used to do a lot of other things, such as simulate various Quantum phase transitions, manipulate small numbers of atoms etc. It's the future of Physics. The Nobel Prize in 2001 was awarded for Cold Atom Experiments.Hkelkar 18:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo[edit]

Why have you quit WikiProject Islam? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have the capacity to be a great editor, but you cannot be so on articles related to religion. If you intend to end editing those articles, and edit something that does not raise such strong emotion in you, I wish you well, and if you need my help for anything, ask. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archives
1 2 3 4 5 6