User talk:Bernie44

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Bradford (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SeraphWiki (talk) 01:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Bernie44! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 01:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Texas Dow Employees Credit Union for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Texas Dow Employees Credit Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Dow Employees Credit Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 04:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom McGrath (media executive), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Yoshimura for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Yoshimura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Yoshimura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Eric Helms) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Eric Helms, Bernie44!

Wikipedia editor Semmendinger just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job with this page! Well sourced and well written. :)

To reply, leave a comment on Semmendinger's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SEMMENDINGER (talk) 01:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cardiogram (company)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Cardiogram (company), Bernie44!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I note your paid editor disclosure and commend you on a well-written, encyclopedic article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Bernie44. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Seeking clarification: Pascal de Sarthe[edit]

Were you paid to write Pascal de Sarthe? Mduvekot (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was a while back, I see that I forgot to leave a tag on the talk page, added it just now.--Bernie44 (talk) 12:39, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kraken Rum logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kraken Rum logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia[edit]

Wikipedia
Hi Bernie44,

I work for a company in Switzerland and I am looking for someone who could write an article for me on Wipedia. Do you still write article for people?

Thanks a lot

Luna L.ricchi (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryan Cohen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft[edit]

Hello, I recently move an article you created to Draft:Ryan Cohen. I have conducted this action as articles created for disclosed payment tend to go through the WP:AFC process.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AvaTrade moved to draftspace[edit]

I've moved AvaTrade to draft space. WP:COI editors are strongly discouraged from editing in mainspace. Please stop doing so, and use AfC to create pages and edit requests on the relative talk-page to ask for changes to existing articles. Apart from anything else, by dumping paid content into Wikipedia you are creating deceptive native advertising, which is illegal under the law of the United States (the law that governs Wikipedia). Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DTV Shredder.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:DTV Shredder.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 18:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bernie44 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for creating an article that is considered by some to be advertising, and for reverting the user who made a redirect out of the page I created. I did create the article in good faith and properly disclosed that I was paid to create it. However, because another user took exception to it, rather than revert the other user I should have discussed the issue with that user, especially in light of my COI. In the future, if unblocked, I will do a better job of heeding WP:COI. I will not create any articles or make any edits that are advertising, and I will focus on contributing positively to Wikipedia.--Bernie44 (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the discussions here on this page and a further review of Bernie44's contributions, I see severe issues with many of Bernie44's edits, ranging from the UPE problems and not following best practices for paied editors despite the commitment to Jytdog to spammy pages based on weak and/or unreliable sources even if the subject is likely notable (in violation of WP:NPOV, one of our core content policies). Saying "sorry" or "oops, I should have listened when others thought it advertisement" is not enough. Huon (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Your disclosure has no impact on this block. Following the terms of use is not an exemption from following local policy: it is the minimum condition to hit the save button. English Wikipedia policy forbids advertising, and the two articles brought to COIN are clear examples of native advertising written in marketing speak. That you decided to revert one of our most dedicated editors who deals with spam after they explained the COI guideline to you just makes it worse. You don’t get to hold local policy hostage to the terms of use: that provision exists so we can determine if you are following local policies and guidelines. You weren’t so now you can’t edit. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • It has never been my intention to create articles that would be considered native advertising, but I should have listened to an experienced user saying that I had done so. I have been editing on here a long time and I believe I have done and have the capability to do a lot of good. In hindsight of course I should not have reverted Justlettersandnumbers, that was an impulsive and wrong decision. I understand what you are saying about local policies and if unblocked I will certainly heed them and be extra careful not to make any edits that would be considered spam. Whenever I have a COI I will propose edits rather than edit directly, and will put any new article through AFC.--Bernie44 (talk) 19:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Commenting on the basis of recent interactions, I believe that clemency should not be extended. While paid editing is allowed, paid editors should not be given undue leeway by volunteer editors. For example, I have twice had to move the article at Ryan Cohen back to the draftspace after Bernie44 moved it to the main article space in the face of the WP:PAID requirement that editors with a conflict of interest submit their articles through AfC. I left a note ([1]) on Bernie's talkpage requesting he send his article through AfC, and yet they chose to themselves move the article back to the mainspace anyway. Looking through their archive, Bernie44 has been a fairly productive and cooperative paid editor since 2012, but they have been made aware of paid editing policy multiple times, and were explicitly directed to WP:PAID at User_talk:Bernie44/Archive_4#Paid_editing_in_Wikipedia; with this being put forward, I support Bernie's block as they have been shown to lack the competency to follow paid editing policy.--SamHolt6 (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • SamHolt6, I was wrong to revert your move of the Ryan Cohen page. I was interpreting your note as optional advice and I was wrong to do that. As you say, I have been fairly productive and cooperative on here for seven years, and if given another chance I pledge to be extra careful to comply with any and all rules and guidelines. I understand the repercussions of not complying and I'm sorry that I have not been as cooperative as I could have been up to this point.--Bernie44 (talk) 21:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I guess I'm just a bit new here, but I think after 7 years of fairly helpful contributions to Wikipedia, a permanent block might be a bit too harsh? As far as I can see, this user has been up-front about being a paid writer, and while there are COI issues to flesh out, I don't think they should be fleshed out in this user's talk page or unblock discussions. The past issues aren't big enough to warrant a permanent block over a single revert. Godrestsinreason (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • User:Godrestsinreason please disclose your connection to Bernie44. This appears to be either a WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT account as your edits almost completely overlap with Bernie44's and your edit notes are similar. Jytdog (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Jytdog - I have no connection to Bernie. I started the account to talk about things I know about. Chewy, the company, Steven Universe, and the WWE. That was an accusation made in horrible faith. What proof would you need? Godrestsinreason (talk) 17:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • For the record I have no idea who that user is, I would never do a sock. There is no association other than that we have both edited the Chewy page.--Bernie44 (talk) 16:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • Thanks for stating that. I have no reason to believe you. You are a smooth talker but you have demonstrated that your words are empty. Jytdog (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am very disappointed in Bernie's behavior. He and I had what I thought was a good, and good faith, interaction back in December. The section is in the archive of this page, here. In that discussion, Bernie44 said that they would abide by the PAID policy and the COI guideline, and would put pages through AfC and make edit requests on talk pages. In other words, not edit directly. They appear to have completely blown that off. I should have checked in more to see if they were actually doing what they said they would do, and feel bad that I didn't. Now that I have reviewed what they have done since December, I see no reason to unblock this person, ever. I thought Bernie44 was one of the good guys, but their behavior has shown complete disdain for the community and its norms. Exploiting the value we (the volunteer editing community) have created for their personal gain is more important to this person, obviously, than pursuit of the mission. (if you don't know what I mean by "exploit the value we have created" see here) Jytdog (talk) 16:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Jytdog, you are right and I apologize. I realize an apology doesn't excuse my behavior. I re-read our discussion and I did say I would put any new article through AFC and I did not do that. We had a good and fair back and forth and I did not keep up my end of the bargain and so I understand your position, as well as the weight it carries.--Bernie44 (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • That is some very skillful smooth talking. It does not give any reason for us to trust you. You were exactly this good-and-reasonable seeming in our December interaction. Jytdog (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • Jytdog - Why is this section riddled with personal attacks and accusations? I have no idea how to go about reporting this behavior, but as much as I know about Wikipedia, this is unbecoming of how admins would like for us to conduct ourselves. What's happening here? Godrestsinreason (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

I see where someone posted a request for you to make them an article. Must be quite a business you have, exploiting Wikipedia? Need to know all your clients. Frankly, IMHO, I cannot see a safe path to unblocking. I could TBAN you from subject X and you get money from subject Y, and we are back where we started. That might not be insurmountable, but I also don't see where you are capable of writing objective prose, especially as you seem to make a living writing ad copy, and do not evince an understanding of how to contribute to an encyclopedia. Beyond that, you would need to be able show us you are to recognize reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Not formally declining so that others can unblock if they disagree with my reasoning, but looks to me like leaving you blocked is the best course of action.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dlohcierekim, there's a list of clients on the user page. Is there an indication that this list is incomplete? That said, I'm leaning towards "no unblock" since the articles in question was blatantly inappropriate, something that Bernie44 apparently fails to recognize even in retrospect ("considered by some to be advertising"). I don't doubt that Bernie44 in good faith believes the pages were appropriate, but that makes it only more difficult to prevent such issues from recurring. Huon (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dlohcierekim, Huon, I'm pretty sure that list is at least partially incomplete – please see my comments yesterday at WP:COIN for examples of undisclosed editing clearly related to paid articles. What's bothering me is that it may be very incomplete. Perhaps Bernie could clarify here what other pages have been created for pay? (Oh, and Dlohcierekim, you might consider watchlisting this). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Huon Justlettersandnumbers Indeed. I felt deeper clarification/fuller disclosure was warranted. And clearly, if they are going to disown the promotionality, that is that the editing was promotional, then I think there is little hope of a return to constructive editing and they might as well stay blocked. Bernie, this is not a "legal" proceeding, where one hides behind words and turns of phrase to evade the truth. This is a behavioral/educational issue, and you must clearly indicate how and where you went amiss, and how you will edit non promotionally.---- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dlohcierekim, Huon, Justlettersandnumbers, I have given this all a lot of thought over the past couple of days, taken to heart all of your comments here on this topic, and examined my actions. In editing for pay I incorrectly focused too much on whether a subject has (what I considered to be) decent press, and didn't take into account enough common sense, like is this subject inherently notable? I didn't pay enough attention to the actions of other, non-COI users who were trying to guide me to see what is and isn't notable, and what sources are and aren't credible. It was my responsibility to stay current with the rules of COI, and I didn't do that. I took the phrase "very strongly discouraged" when it comes to direct editing as advice rather than a rule I should follow. I should not have been editing or creating directly when I had a COI, especially since I was warned against it. I feel terrible because I do want to constructively contribute to Wikipedia. Regarding the list on my user page, I hadn't updated it for a while (another mistake on my part), and I will go through and do so now. If I am given another chance and unblocked, I will focus on non-COI editing, which I do take great pride in, will cease editing for pay, and if I want to propose an edit to an article on which I already have a COI, will properly and clearly disclose my COI. I agree with you all that I have edited inappropriately, and for that I am sorry. This experience has taught me that, if unblocked, I need to be a lot better at being a part of this great community, so I can truly contribute positively here.--Bernie44 (talk) 16:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize I can't edit my user page - I was going to update the chart on there, will instead add other articles here. Starting to go through it now.--Bernie44 (talk) 16:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update to client list on talk page (will look to see if there are others later):

--Bernie44 (talk) 16:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Juice-Generation-Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Juice-Generation-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bens Garden Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bens Garden Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DTV Shredder.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DTV Shredder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wade Eyerly has been accepted[edit]

Wade Eyerly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 10:46, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:FreeConferenceCall Logo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:FreeConferenceCall Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Cohen has been accepted[edit]

Ryan Cohen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Biblio (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FreeConferenceCall Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FreeConferenceCall Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stash Finance Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stash Finance Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malfy-Gin-Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malfy-Gin-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slapfish Restaurant Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slapfish Restaurant Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global Road Entertainment Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global Road Entertainment Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Juice Press Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Juice Press Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MSecure-logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MSecure-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sigma Beauty Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sigma Beauty Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the Tokyo District Court ruling from the Medidata Page?[edit]

Why did you remove the Tokyo District Court ruling from the Medidata Solutions? --Zaurus (talk) 00:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Getac Logo Orange.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Getac Logo Orange.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gotham-Greens-Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gotham-Greens-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Interactive One logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Interactive One logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SportsBlog-logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SportsBlog-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WS Darley logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WS Darley logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Feeding Ground English Cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feeding Ground English Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Camp Gladiator Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camp Gladiator Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bitter Truth Heads Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bitter Truth Heads Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bitter Truth Jerry Thomas Bitters.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bitter Truth Jerry Thomas Bitters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IMazing Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IMazing Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:16 Handles logo.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:16 Handles logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Willy1018 (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marcus Antebi[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcus Antebi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Zealot Networks Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juice Press[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Juice Press".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Green Flash Brewing Company logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Green Flash Brewing Company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FrenchPastrySchool-logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FrenchPastrySchool-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:IMazing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kb03 (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Apprenda[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apprenda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FreeConferenceCall.com[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FreeConferenceCall.com".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mel Elias[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mel Elias".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joel Gamoran[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joel Gamoran".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael J. Kelly has been accepted[edit]

Michael J. Kelly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ToT89 (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Karma Automotive Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Karma Automotive Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Solomon Choi[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Solomon Choi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ben's Garden[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ben's Garden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Andrew Cedar[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andrew Cedar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 04:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Thomas (designer)[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roger Thomas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sigma Beauty (company)[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sigma Beauty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Passions Network Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Siggis-Dairy-Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Siggis-Dairy-Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Money Under 30 Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Money Under 30 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mel Elias[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mel Elias".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Toilet footstool[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bernie44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Toilet footstool, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Toilet footstool[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toilet footstool".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Kevin Larmee Chicago Beach 2005.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Neo-expressionism which fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. While non-free examples of this particular style of art could possibly justified, this particular one is not the subject of any sourced critical commentary anywhere in the article and the painter is mentioned by name only twice (one in the file's caption and once as part of a list of names); so, there's really no cotextual justification for this particular file's use per WP:NFC#CS. In addition, there are a couple examples of Kevin Larmee's work uploaded to Commons under free licenses which might be able to be used instead of this non-free one if an example of Larmee's work is needed for the reader to understand this particular article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cinderella 2015 official poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cinderella 2015 official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roger Thomas (designer)[edit]

Hello, Bernie44. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roger Thomas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jose Cuervo Logo BW.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jose Cuervo Logo BW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Dos Toros Logo.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:Dos Toros Taqueria (restaurant chain). No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Benetti Fisker 50 Champagne chiller.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benetti Fisker 50 Champagne chiller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering front grille.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering front grille.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering master suite.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering master suite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Benetti Fisker 50 rendering.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fisker Inc Car Prototype 2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fisker Inc Car Prototype 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Film and Television Master's program at Sacred Heart University has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG; it's not independently notable and notability is not inherited from its notable parent organization

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FTMA-logo-2013.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FTMA-logo-2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Knight-Hennessy Scholars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources about the program.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:Namiba 20:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UniKey for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UniKey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniKey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheBoy 2016-OfficialPoster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheBoy 2016-OfficialPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]