User talk:BeauSuzanne

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	This is to give you well-deserved credit for your amazing contributions in the fields of Pakistani Arts and Entertainment especially in Films and Music Hope you can continue doing this. Cheers.... Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks(BeauSuzanne (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, BeauSuzanne. Thank you for your work on Nimmo (actress). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shazeal Shoukat[edit]

Hello - since you created the BLP on Shazeal Shoukat and cited a video source as reference, could you please specify the timestamp in the interview where the actress mentioned her early life details? I hope you're not adding WP:OR into BLPS by using fabricated references. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have written it from her interview. I will do the timestamp.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

You included details such as her date of birth and birthplace. Could you please provide the specific section of the video where she mentions these details? —Saqib (talk | contribs) 16:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was in her interview on Express Channel. Now I couldn't find the video but she mentioned her birthplace and education. In the recent short video from ARY Digital which I add she mentions about her school and education briefly.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

This raises serious concerns about the accuracy of your contributions and your approach to BLPs. Are similar practices being employed elsewhere? This is a contentious area and failure to comply with policies could result in being blocked. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am honest that I don't have any connection with anyone nor do I do know anyone here. I was once mistaken but I told them that I don't have any connection or am paid contributor. I simply just want to contribute. I admit my mistake that I didn't properly added video source which was my mistake but now I achrive it and add it.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

The BLP in question, which you've now acknowledged adding WP:OR to, was created earlier this year. However, your editing history under this username spans back to 2020, during which you've created hundreds of BLPs (majority on non-notable actors). So this prompts the question. Have you been engaging in similar behavior over the past 3/4 years? Your denial of any wrongdoing lacks credibility. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 18:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I made this article now. Back in 2020 when I started making articles I didn't knew about that it can be request for undeletion of articles. And I would make articles which were deleted But I don't know who made them back then and how were they made and how the articles looked. Now recently I learned of it that a delete article can be requested for Undeletion request. And I am not a paid contributor and I don't know anyone.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

The facts don't seem to support the claims being made. Your sole use of WP:REFUND, specifically for Natalia Awais in 2020 and there's been no subsequent engagement with WP:REFUND. Therefore, your claims seem unfounded. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 18:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did ask for Natalia Awais but I didn't know it the proper way to get it back. Now I learned the proper way like I said I was new to everything here.(BeauSuzanne (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Erum_Akhtar#Early_life - Could you please pinpoint the timestamp in the interview where the actress mentioned her early life details? —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will check for the video interview again. This is not the interview. If it's not founded I will remove the early life section. But I found her old interview which used to be on Youtube now it's deleted. The old interview is on the mixcloud should I add it here. (BeauSuzanne (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of Erum Akhtar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erum Akhtar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erum Akhtar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.