User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive028

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


→ Current time is at least 1:00 (GMT) ←

Our social network

Unprotected talk page
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive026
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive027
Commons
Wiktionary
Simple English Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer
Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer
Wikipedia:General disclaimer

Wikipedia:Editing restrictions

counts


End of year rant (I feel entitled...)

Happy New Year, Bugs!

But you sure know how to take all the joy out of reading a Watchlist {I'm thinking of making this into the last 2023 entry onto WP:Arbitrators' Noticeboard/No Fun

—— Shakescene (talk) 23:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page archives

Hello, Baseball Bugs,

I don't understand why you move your talk page archives around so there are redirects like User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive028/Archive024/Archive017. These make no sense at all and serve no purpose. You have over 300 user talk pages! Would you consider tagging some or all of these twisted redirects CSD G7? Thank you and Happy New Year's! Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Yes, I know it's all messed up, but I don't know how to fix it. :( ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for help, at the Help Desk. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it's been fixed, by user Pppery with additional comments by PrimeHunter. Thank you, all!!! ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 08:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prematurely closing discussions

Hello Bugs, I know you're a respected long time editor at WP:RD. So I'm wondering why you reverted my edit, contrary to how I understand our Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. What guideline is your action based on? ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 09:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit, your edit summary was “WP:DENY” . But there are two things wrong with that:

  1. WP:DENY is just an essay, which prominently begins with a warning that it is not a policy or guideline. Even if you didn't read that, a long time editor such as you should know well that essays in no way invalidate existing guidelines. So please read, understand and follow the immediately relevant guidelines, at least in this case Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Marking a closed discussion.
  2. Even if WP:DENY were a policy or guideline, it doesn't apply: As it clearly explains in its lede, it applies only to edits that are “interrupting and frustrating the Wikipedia project and community”. That is obviously not the case when a topic gathered entirely constructive edits by other editors.

Since I follow Don't_re-revert, I won't be reverting your revert. But I'm asking you to please revert that revert of yours. ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 10:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I brought this up at AN. ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 18:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of What Are We Going to Do with Uncle Arthur? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What Are We Going to Do with Uncle Arthur? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Are We Going to Do with Uncle Arthur? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National League Park (disambiguation)

Notice

The article National League Park (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baseball_Bugs/Archive028&oldid=1212702248"