User talk:Baldrick90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Hello, I have worked with most of the points that you presented in this nomination, updates or further comments are welcome, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 21:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help on the a-ha discography. --Alive Would? Sun (talk) 09:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Arizona state symbols[edit]

What do you mean "Add "Latin" to the motto translation" ? Bewareofdog 01:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • What I mean is add [[Latin]] to let people know the motto is in Latin. Baldrick90 (talk) 21:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLCs[edit]

Hey. As one of WP:FLCs biggest contributors, I was hoping to ask you to revisit some (or all!) of the lists you've reviewed recently and see if any concerns you might have raised have subsequently been addressed. FLCs are gaining a lot of interest and plenty of comments but not many supports or opposes - while the "four supports" minimum has been removed, lists still need community consensus for them to be promoted. Thanks for your contributions so far, keep up the great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of which, I was wondering if you could look back at some of the comments you left at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of heads of government of the Central African Republic and Central African Empire. Thanks, Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 12:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I am in Malta right now (and have been since June 27) and didn't have much time for nor access to WP. I will be back next Sunday and I hope I can be of as much value as before. Thanks for your concerns. Nishkid64, congratulations on the CAR list promotion. I will attend to my comments when I'm back and tell you if there's still something about it that needs work, but it looks good :) Regards, Baldrick90 (talk) 12:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of atheists (surnames C to D)[edit]

I see you created List of atheists (surnames C to D). You have done well so far however: User:Oolon Colluphid/sandbox. As you see this fellow has finished the list (I think). I don't know why he hasn't put the info onto the page itself yet. So just a heads up incase you didn't know so you don't waste your time inputting the people he has already done. The rest of the surname lists are yet to be done I think.--EchetusXe (talk) 12:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dunya Khayame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 14:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sabra Dahhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Trevor Marron (talk) 11:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Martine van den Toorn-van Dam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 16:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dunya Khayame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails wp:n

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bonewah (talk) 02:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vraag over List of Moroccan Dutch people[edit]

Beste Baldrick90, Voor het gemak maar even in het Nederlands. Op kantoor (Wikimedia) kregen wij van iemand een vraag binnen over de pagina List of Moroccan Dutch people. Ik heb de vraag op de email staan en die zou ik graag toesturen en jullie in contact brengen met elkaar. Het handigst is denk ik mocht u dat willen natuurlijk even een email te sturen naar [email protected] zodat ik de gegevens door kan sturen. Groet, SindyM3 (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lijsten aan te leggen van algemeen bekende en gerespecteerde Nederlanders met een Marokkaanse achtergrond[edit]

Waarde Baldrick90,

Mijn naam is Frank Bovenkerk. Ik ben emeritus hoogleraar aan de juridische faculteit van de Universiteit Utrecht. In het kader van een studie die ik maak over succes en mislukken van migratie in Nederland, ben ik bezig lijsten aan te leggen van algemeen bekende en gerespecteerde Nederlanders met een Marokkaanse achtergrond. Ik heb dit nodig om twee vergelijkingen te maken: (a) Marokkanen in Nederland in vergelijking met andere immigrantengroepen en (b) Marokkanen in andere Europese immigratielanden: Frankrijk, België en Duitsland. Op Wikipedia heb ik zulke lijsten reeds aangetroffen en ik zou dit heel graag voor mijn onderzoek gebruiken. Om er wetenschappelijk iets mee te kunnen doen moet ik iets weten over de vergelijkbaarheid van deze lijsten. U bent met de lijst voor Nederland begonnen. Mijn eerste vraag luidt: via welke criteria bent U te werk gegaan en hoe bent U aan de namen gekomen? Mijn tweede vraag: hebt U ook de lijst van andere immigrantengroepen gemaakt? Via dezelfde systematiek? Wanneer dit andere personen zijn, hebt U daarmee overlegd en contact? Mijn derde vraag: wie heeft de 'Marokkanenlijst' in de andere landen gemaakt? Hebt U daarmee overlegd? Is er misschien sprake van een centraal initiatief dat in verschillende landen wordt uitgevoerd?

U zou mij buitengewoon helpen door met mij in contact te treden. Mijn emailadres is F. [email protected] Over mijn persoon kunt U mijn website raadplegen onder de naam professor Frank Bovenkerk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank Bovenkerk (talkcontribs) 15:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For creating an article on Jan P. Strijbos. gidonb (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wesley Dorrius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Loubna Berrada for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loubna Berrada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loubna Berrada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Friesland articles by quality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]