User talk:Bücherwürmlein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elbing, Kansas[edit]

Thanks for trying to improve Elbing, Kansas! I've reverted your edit, however: in Kansas, all municipalities, regardless of size, are called "cities". It's the same with places such as Quinter, Kansas, about which I've had some discussions with German-speaking editors. I agree that it's silly; sorry that it has to be this way. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know this, thanks for informing. Kind regards, --Bücherwürmlein (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Education and Professional Development[edit]

Hallo,

ich hab Deinen revert rückgängig gemacht. Das war kein Vandalismus, sondern der einzige maßgebliche Autor hat seine advert-getaggte Seite geblankt.

Gunnar Hendrich 21:42, 12. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Ah, okay, das gilt auf en als Zeichen, dass man die Seite gelöscht haben möchte? Wusste ich noch nicht, sorry. Gruß, --buecherwuermlein 21:59, 12. Aug. 2008 (CEST)
Ich weiß nicht, ob er das wusste, es wird nach en:WP:CSD#G7 jedenfalls so ausgelegt:
Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. (For redirects created as a result of a pagemove, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the page prior to the move.) If the author blanks the page (outside user space), this can be taken as a deletion request.
Gruß, Gunnar Hendrich 22:21, 12. Aug. 2008 (CEST)
Gut, danke, das muss ich mir merken. Gute Nacht, --buecherwuermlein 22:27, 12. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Thank you for your help[edit]

Thank you for catching the vandalism to our Wikia Search article. --A. B. 17:07, 26. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

No problem. :) Greetings, --buecherwuermlein 17:24, 26. Aug. 2008 (CEST)

Award[edit]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your work with vandal fighting today, I, CanadianLinuxUser, hereby award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work ! --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! :-) Greetings, --buecherwuermlein 17:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)[edit]

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at [email protected]. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]