User talk:Autisticeditor 20

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Testicle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 22:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SomeoneIguess. I noticed that you recently removed content from Penis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Someone, i guess^{(talk i guess|le edit list)} 23:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, well some user just said the article needed a rewrite and I was trying to help. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Penis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Penis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Piped links at Male reproductive system

I'm not sure exactly in which edit they occurred, but you introduced unnecessary piped links somewhere in these 13 edits (over-all diff). Example:

−

and pulls the scrotum closer to the body, while the [[dartos muscle]] gives it a wrinkled appearance;

+

and pulls the scrotum closer to the body, while the [[Dartos fascia|dartos muscle]] gives it a wrinkled appearance;

N This is not an improvement! And there were others; find newly piped "spermatic artery" on that page, and fix that, please. And don't unnecessarily pipe links, okay?

Some of the other links seemed unnecessary, like adding [[sperm]]; but okay, maybe. But please watch the messing around with piped links, at least; that's been mentioned before by someone above. See WP:NOPIPE. Mathglot (talk) 07:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about that! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Autisticeditor 20!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Clarifying my revert on Smile

Hey there I just wanted to clarify why I reverted your recent edit on "Smile".

I'm actually autistic like you, and I have this weird OCD where I get irritated when things don't go my way too. I understand that us autistics can be obssessive, sometimes you just gotta control it like me.

Well, you see, I get kinda ticked when general articles that have animal information (such as vomit and wakefulness) use human anatomy links exclusively despite those topic not exclusive to humans or articles that only talk about humans (such as face) despite being present in other animals. This is because I'm an activist for animals and I want to see more animal coverage here on WP.

But that aside, I want to clarify that I reverted your edit on "Smile" as, well, smiling is also seen in non-human species such as our closest primate relatives, as well as some domesticated animals such as horses and dogs. Also, there's an entire "Other animals" section in this article. If there's a section on that, it usually confirms that that topic is not exclusive to humans.

I want you to rethink your edits. If its not exclusively human-centric, don't put human anatomy links, but if it does refer to exclusively humans, then do it.

Cheers, Just someone who wants more animal content on WP LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 11:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry. It actually makes sense why you reverted that. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 14:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Cross-country skiing

AutisticEditor, you may be interested in a discussion at Talk:Cross-country skiing#Travel vs transport. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion for Archiving Your Talk Page

Hello Autisticeditor 20,

I hope this message finds you well. I've noticed that your Talk page has grown quite extensive, which is a testament to your active engagement on Wikipedia. However, I'd like to suggest considering archiving some of the older discussions.

Archiving can lead to several benefits, including:

• Better Organization: It makes it easier for you and others to navigate through current discussions without scrolling through a long history of past conversations.
• More Conducive Conversations: With a cleaner Talk page, it becomes simpler for other editors to engage in ongoing discussions and for you to manage responses.
• Improved User Experience: For users on older computers or slower networks, a shorter page can significantly enhance loading times and overall accessibility.

If you're unsure about how to archive your Talk page, you can find detailed instructions here. I'm also happy to assist if you need any help.

Thank you for considering this suggestion. Your contributions to Wikipedia are greatly valued, and I believe that archiving could make your Talk page even more effective as a tool for collaboration.

Best regards, skarz (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Could you help me please? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Step 1: paste this code on this page somewhere (usually the top of the page). {{subst:Setup cluebot archiving|archives=yes}}. Step 2: Done. Pabsoluterince (talk) 03:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 04:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Somebody help me!

SparksyFruit is reverting back to their old edits and making insults towards me in the process!!!! They must be stopped!!! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Autisticeditor 20, I have the same issue with that user (@SparksyFruit) previously regarding the blanking of the YouTube page yesterday when I added some content to it, please see the page history for details. Next time in the future, it is better to report such matters to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents instead of further escalating the situation. Best regards --cyrfaw (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

No problem! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring reminder

Based on the length of your user talk page, I can’t readily tell, but as a reminder, WP:3RR is a bright line you can be blocked for crossing. —C.Fred (talk) 22:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

SparksyFruit keeps being unconstructive and insulting me! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Neither of those are exceptions to the policy. I’m not convinced that SparksyFruit’s content-related edits were in bad faith, although the personal attacks were out of line. —C.Fred (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

So I'm wrong? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Did you violate 3RR? Yes. Repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

The (or "a") problem with edit-warring is that nobody wins and often nobody is willing to stop, but everyone either gets annoyed or sometimes gets excitement by getting someone else annoyed. So instead, ask for an admin, who can force it to stop by locking the page and/or blocking an editor. DMacks (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

How do I ask for an admin? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

If there is an edit-war in particular, report it at WP:3RR or WP:EW. If there is a certain editor that is being a problem (abusive, etc.), report it at WP:AIV. DMacks (talk) 22:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

(edit conflict × 2)Autisticeditor 20, just wanted to reiterate what C.Fred has already said. Just because someone else is wrong (and you don't know that for sure until any disagreements have been talked out at the Talk page), that is no reason to revert them 25 times in rapid succession, as you did here. That is definitely blockable in a heartbeat, and you are lucky you are not blocked now. Two times is about the limit; if they revert a third time, take them to the Edit warring noticeboard. Don't keep edit-warring yourself just because they do; that is disruptive to the encyclopedia; let the other guy get the block, not you. When it starts happening, just stop, and go straight to the noticeboard, and let them know what is happening. Other than that, hope you are doing well. Mathglot (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Post-edit conflict addendum: you could ask for an admin, but a better option is the Edit warring noticeboard, which is continuously monitored by multiple admins. Mathglot (talk) 22:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for everything! Again I am so sorry about my conduct with that user. I'll do better. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Labia majora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page External pudendal artery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your work regarding the correction of wikilinks.

JacktheBrown (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Copying/moving content within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Vagina into Human vagina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! 🤗 I just felt like some articles had to be split into two. I apologize for any wrongdoing. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

You keep saying you are sorry but you keep incessantly adjusting sex articles. How could you possibly think that it would be ok to completely change and remove 117,380 bytes at Vulva without discussion? You will be blocked if unattributed copying between articles occurs again, see WP:CWW. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I really am! Next time I'll ask! I won't do it again without permission. I promise. I apologize. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Splitting the high-profile articles

Dear colleague, please note that WP:Splitting says, with high-profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). The articles you were splitting, Vulva and Vagina, are definitely "high-profile". Please avoid such drastic changes in the future without a thorough discussion. Sincerely, Викидим (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot… Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I really hope you're happy reverting all my work. Wanna cookie? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 20:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I just got upset that I once again messed up. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Baccalà alla lucana

Thank you for adding a reference. I would like to report that it's not formatted correctly; since you added it (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baccal%C3%A0_alla_lucana&diff=prev&oldid=1214214609), could you solve this problem? JacktheBrown (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Warning users

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to The Merchant of Venice: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. See also [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 14:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)