User talk:Annalisa Ventola

File copyright problem with File:Annalisa 2009 small.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Annalisa 2009 small.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Auto archive

It's supposed to archive every 30 days, but now I'm not sure if it's 30 days from when it was installed, or just 30 days in general. It's been awhile since I've played with the bot. For all I know it's broken : ) Try setting it to 1 day and see if it does anything in a day. --Nealparr ^{(talk to me)} 02:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't look like it is, check here: User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. Dreadstar ☥ 04:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Fringe guidelines

A large proportion of your edits appear to be in the period during the infancy of the fringe theories guideline. I would suggest, perhaps, familiarising yourself with it and WP:PSCI, IRWolfie- (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I will look over these pages later tonight. Annalisa Ventola _{(Talk | Contribs)} 14:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, Annalisa Ventola. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Parapsychological Association, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

This is redundant information. See my user page. Annalisa Ventola _{(Talk | Contribs)} 16:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Sheldrake

It would be very helpful, IMHO, if you could post some sort of opinion HERE. The Sheldrake talk page is short of people who know how to express opinions politely and helpfully. Anything at all from such a person could serve as an example to others. Lou Sander (talk) 01:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Lou Sander's notice to you. Thank you.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

the section is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lou_Sander -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Precious

parapsychology

Thank you quality professional contributions in the field of parapsychology, based on excellent sources, knowing the "value of rigorous scientific and scholarly inquiry", for "We are, after all, all real people on the other side of the screen." - night musician and righteous psi-beeyatch, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1403 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Annalisa 2009 small.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Annalisa 2009 small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology

User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 23:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I blanked your userpage as a result of the above discussion, which you were notified of but did not deign to participate in. While I have no particular issue with your un-blanking and will not be reversing it, keep in mind that you were given the opportunity to participate in the discussion and failed to do so. There is no need for an undo with a sarcastic edit summary - if you had questions about what I did, you could easily have come to my talk page to discuss the situation with me. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

"Sources"

Your page was blanked because most of the sources are unusable per WP:RS and you have not edited since 2016. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology. The problem is that you are responsible for half of all the links to some crank websites (e.g. deanradin.com) and your page is making it much more time-consuming to monitor for inappropriate use of these sources. Guy (Help!) 13:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology

User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Annalisa Ventola/Sources for parapsychology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 08:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)