User talk:Anassjerjawi
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Speedy deletion nomination of The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor[edit]
A tag has been placed on The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W talk 11:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor[edit]
A tag has been placed on Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W talk 11:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Warning for rapid multiple recreations, under different names (Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, and counting...) of an article that you know has been deleted at AfD for being about a non-notable subject (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor). Thomas.W talk 11:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Thomas I am the official representative of the organization and I have some comments on your last procedures. I just wonder about the reason behind deletion my page. you know that I took all of the sequential steps in creating this page. There are tens of thousands of organization's and companies pages on Wikipedia, What's the wrong with my page? Please guide me to some steps to follow in order to guarantee creating my page next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjassjerjawi (talk • contribs)
- See Wikipedia:Notability. To get an article here an organisation must be notable (by Wikipedia's standards), with the notability proven by there existing multiple reliable third-party sources each providing substantial cover of the organisation as such, that is articles by others about your organisation, not the organisation's own press releases, articles mentioning such press releases, or articles interviewing people who work for the organisation. But no such sources have been provided, which is why the article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, and why the multiple recreations are also being deleted. Just being able to prove that the organisation exists isn't enough to get an article here. Rules that have been explained to other people in your organisation multiple times, and should come as no surprise to you. Thomas.W talk 12:23, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
ANI-notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 16:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Copy and pasting[edit]
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/world/africa/liliane-daoud-egypt-critics.html
New editors are not allowed to edit I/P conflict articles+COI[edit]
Per WP:ARBPIA3: All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition may be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Also it seem that you have conflict of interest as you represent organisation please see the warning bellow and don't insert links to this organisation in to the articles.--Shrike (talk) 08:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anassjerjawi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
November 2017[edit]
Your addition to Ali Bin Said Bin Smaikh Break Al owair Al-Marri has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Aroub Soubh[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aroub Soubh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 17:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Olivier Adam (UNV)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Olivier Adam (UNV) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.unv.org/about-unv/who-we-are/olivier-adam-unv-executive-coordinator. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 14:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BilledMammal (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. BilledMammal (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021[edit]
Hello Anassjerjawi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anassjerjawi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anassjerjawi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MarioGom (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Re: a chance for cooperation[edit]
Hi Anassjerjawi.
Nice to meet you.
I think you’d better contact the Italian Wikimedia chapter, at [email protected].
Best, --Filippof (talk) 13:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Anassjerjawi,
Can you provide some more information?Venicescapes (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Venicescapes!
Can we contact via email or WhatsApp to discuss more details? If this possible, please write your email or WhatsApp number. Thank you