User talk:Ambrose.chongo
Welcome[edit]
|
March 2009[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to African Institute for Mathematical Sciences. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your comments on Talk:African Institute for Mathematical Sciences: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as African Institute for Mathematical Sciences. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, you will be blocked from editing. Edward321 (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as African Institute for Mathematical Sciences. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Edward321 (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward321 (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009[edit]
Hello, I saw a few of the comments you made to other users and I have a few concerns. For instance, in this edit [1] you make a comment saying that the article shouldn't be edited by other users. Please note that this goes against wikipedia's policy of allowing any editor to edit freely. Also, please do not make insulting comments towards other users and saying their edits are "insane". It is important that you remain civil during your discussions with other users. Please note that if you continue with this sort of activity you run the risk of being blocked. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Icestorm815 • Talk 02:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Even if you did call someone inane instead of insane, there is never a good reason to insult anyone no matter how much you think it is justified. It's consideder a personal attack. Any editor is allowed to edit the article regardless if they attended or work at said institution. Wikipedia's policy allows any editor to edit constructively regardless of their relation to the subject matter. Consider this, how many editors do you believe actually work or live in the White House? Also, it should be noted that wikipedia's policies require that you include third party sources, therefore your first hand experience or knowledge may not be included in the article. Finally, please do not blank your talk page. archive it instead If you still have any questions, please let me know. Icestorm815 • Talk 09:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Ambrose, I was a staff member of AIMS for 2 years. I was there when you left. Not that this has anything to do with my ability to edit the article. Wizzy…☎ 12:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me for chiming in, but you seem to be misunderstanding something. According to you:
| “ | AIMS is only known in closed circles. To this end only people in such closed circles may make contributions to the article | ” |
This is, in fact, totally incorrect. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Any material added to the article should stem from a published source independent of the subject. This means that information that is only known in closed circles, would not be suitable for the article anyway, and any editor may freely edit any article as long as the edits are based on information from reliable sources. decltype (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Image copyright problem with File:Institute-new.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Institute-new.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Institute-new2.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Institute-new2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Oksendal2.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Oksendal2.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 22:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Oksendal2.PNG[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Oksendal2.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Oksendal.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Oksendal.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 22:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Oksendal2.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Oksendal2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Oksendal.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Oksendal.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Topbar.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Topbar.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Institute-new.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Institute-new.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Malliavin calculus[edit]
Hello, I am a Moroccan futur graduate student pursing my Master of Modeling and Mathematical Engineering from Hassan II University in Morocco My specialties are spread primarily on stochastic processes and probability with applications in finance This semester i am working on my dissertation on ' Malliavin calculus and it's applications in finance ' specially in computation of Greeks for european , asian and american options Can you please send me your code that you used for computing the greeks .
Thx.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.251.115.166 (talk) 10:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)