User talk:AlexGyss

December 2013[edit]

Hello, AlexGyss. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

You appear to have a conflict of interest in 2013 Glasgow helicopter crash given your previous (and only other edits) to Eurocopter Martin451 15:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, you should make yourself familiar with WP:EW and WP:BRD. When material you add or remove is challenged, you don't revert without discussion. Especially not when that addition or removal is for the second time. If you have issues with material in an article, then discuss it on the talk page of that article. Wikipedia is not here to portray any aircraft or manufacturer in a positive light all the time, but to accurately document the good and the bad without making judgements, per WP:NPOV. Please do not edit war any further or you may face sanctions up to and including a block from editing. Any questions, please ask. Mjroots (talk) 17:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, true, I forget to explain why I change the text, my fault! ~~AlexGyss~~

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AlexGyss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 23:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus Helicopters[edit]

I appreciate that your were only trying to help but moving all the Eurocopter product articles to Airbus Helicopters has caused a few problems. Please do not move anymore articles without gaining a consensus as it will take a while to move most of the articles back to the original names. A change of company name does not change the common name of the products, if you can help tidy up by moving articles back to the correct names then that would be appreciated, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I check the changes and it works well... where did you see a mistake?

Orphaned non-free image File:Airbus Helicopters company Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Airbus Helicopters company Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:AIRBUS RGB.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AIRBUS RGB.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]