User talk:Agneta 92

November 2022[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Oleg Tinkov does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Paulpat99 (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Evander Holyfield has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – ².O.^Boxing 09:27, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adil Tursunov has been accepted[edit]

Adil Tursunov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kairbek Uskenbayev (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Where does the information in the "Personal" section come from?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kairbek Uskenbayev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Agneta 92! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erkin Tatishev (February 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Misterrrrr were:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erkin Tatishev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Misterrrrr (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Agneta 92 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erkin Tatishev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Agneta 92 (talk) 11:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Misterrrrr, thank you for patrolling new articles in drafts! I would like you to check the article that I changed in the draft, add links.Agneta 92 (talk) 11:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will not review this now. Because you're requesting for. --- 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarsenbek Montaev (February 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarsenbek Montaev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Agneta 92, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 👑Misterrrrr👑 (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Erkin Tatishev has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erkin Tatishev. Thanks! Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Petrynenko[edit]

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from uk.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. If you can confirm where material for this article was sourced I’ll add the template to the talk page for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galimzhan Yesenov (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are still a few unreferenced sentences in this Wikipedia:BLP article, and they should be removed or backed up with reliable, independent sources. The Public Activities section also needs copyediting so that it sounds more cohesive and encyclopaedic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Galimzhan Yesenov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Galimzhan Yesenov has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Galimzhan Yesenov. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsulu Zakarya (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements need sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kunsulu Zakarya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galimzhan Yesenov has been accepted[edit]

Galimzhan Yesenov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aidyn Rakhimbaev has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aidyn Rakhimbaev. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bakhytbek Baiseitov (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikieditor019 was:

The english/grammar of the article needs to be improved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bakhytbek Baiseitov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aidyn Rakhimbaev has been accepted[edit]

Aidyn Rakhimbaev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsulu Zakarya (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for creating this draft. It needs to be edited and the English improved - in some sections there is a list of titles which are not in sentences, for example.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kunsulu Zakarya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bakhytbek Baiseitov (April 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikieditor019 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Same reason as last deny: The english/grammar of the article needs to be improved. Please use a spell checker. E.g: Grammarly

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bakhytbek Baiseitov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bakhytbek Baiseitov has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bakhytbek Baiseitov. Thanks! Wikieditor019 (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aisulu Azimbayeva for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aisulu Azimbayeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisulu Azimbayeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NortonAngo (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kairbek Uskenbayev (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

There is some pieces that are unsource and the 2015 award is unsourced. This is a WP:BLP and needs real WP:SECONDARY sourcing. It is also is cv format. These bullet lists are unacceptable. Wikipedia articles are not profile. Rewrite it as prose style.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kairbek Uskenbayev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 15:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erkin Tatishev has been accepted[edit]

Erkin Tatishev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Klebanov has been accepted[edit]

Alexander Klebanov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 12:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daulet Otarbayev (June 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think this person can be notable, but you need to prove that. Interviews does not count towards notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daulet Otarbayev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca^{talk to me!} 04:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nurali Aliyev (July 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nurali Aliyev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 15:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinmukhamet Idrisov (July 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Biographies of living people have stricter citation requirements than other article (see WP:BLP) - please ensure you've got sufficient citations on the statements you make before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinmukhamet Idrisov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 09:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sarsenbek Montaev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarsenbek Montaev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinmukhamet Idrisov has been accepted[edit]

Dinmukhamet Idrisov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:19, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bakhytzhan Ertaev[edit]

Hi I just want to thank you for creating the article for Bakhytzhan Ertaev. I'm new here too and have no idea how to give an award or anything but I do want to thank you for doing it, I was planning on writing it but I see you beat me to it. Would you like to work on articles about Heroes of Kazakhstan together? There are many that don't have articles yet. I am working on a draft for Qasim Qaysenov right now and recently published articles for Great Patriotic War veterans Tuleugali Abdybekov and Ibragim Suleymanov. Thank you for your great work and I hope to see more of it soon! KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KazyKazyKazakhstan! I am grateful that you appreciated my work. I am happy to take part in writing articles about Heroes and other famous personalities of Kazakhstan, which is exactly what I am doing. I will be glad to interact with you.Agneta 92 (talk) 08:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great! How about I make a list of important Kazakhstan articles in my sandbox, and then we can split up the names on the list so that we don't accidentally both work on separate drafts of the same article at the same time?--KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made the list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KazyKazyKazakhstan/sandbox/Kazakh_list KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KazyKazyKazakhstan! Thanks for the list! In the near future I will publish an article about Mambetov Azerbaijan, it is almost ready. In the draft I have an article about Kunsulu Zakarya, I still can't get her out into space. I am currently busy writing another article, but I will study your list in more detail as soon as I have time. Agneta 92 (talk) 04:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have written a lot of articles already, maybe you can try to skip the page curation process and just go straight to publishing your articles? Draft reveiwers seem to be very anti-Central Asian anyway, I had to deal with a reveiwer who made no attempt to read the sources in my article for Suleymanov before rejecting it.--KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 11:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remember the language links[edit]

Please remember to add the links to the other language copies of your articles so that people can easily find the Russian and or Kazakh language articles.KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short Kazakh articles[edit]

Would you be interested in expanding some of these short articles that I started off? I want to help every name on this list have an article but it will take a lot longer if I don't start a new article until finishing the earlier one and it will go a lot faster if we work together? I kinda finished the one for Anuar Abutalipov and did a little work on the article for Nurken Abdirov, but the articles for Mikhail Abdolov, Sadyk Abdujabbarov, Mukatai Abeulov, Serikqazi Bekbosinov need to be added to and it would help a lot if you could add to them. Thank you so much for your work! :) --KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 01:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aliya Moldagulova[edit]

The article about Aliya Moldagulova needs a lot of work on it. Lots of paragraphs don't have citations at all. I will try to find copies of the books that the article uses but it probably won't be easy. I think that if we clean up the article well enough then it could be an article of the day featured on the front page of Wikipedia. After all, we do want more people to know about her feat. I already took the liberty of putting links to her name in other articles about women snipers like Ziba Ganiyeva. I'm also working on research about a Kazakh woman tank driver. If we can't make the article for Aliya Moldagulova on the front page then maybe we could try for Khiuaz Dospanova for Manshuk Mametova maybe. I don't think there is enough media for us to get Isqaqova on the front page however. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunsulu Zakarya has been accepted[edit]

Kunsulu Zakarya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shahmardan Esenov[edit]

Can you please work on Shahmardan Esenov article? I am a bit busy right now but because he was the President of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR he really needs an article.--KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translated pages[edit]

Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that when you translate an article you need to note on the talkpage that the page is translated. Thanks again for all your good work!--KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Award[edit]

		The Kazakhstan Barnstar of National Merit
		Great job for all your work writing articles about famous Kazakhs! Wikipedia really needs it. I'll give you another one of these if you do articles about the other presidents of the academy and expand the existing ones that are stubs. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KazyKazyKazakhstan! Thank you for appreciating my work! Agneta 92 (talk) 09:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bakhytbek Baiseitov[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bakhytbek Baiseitov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 07:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kairbek Uskenbayev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kairbek Uskenbayev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daulet Otarbayev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daulet Otarbayev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daulet Otarbayev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daulet Otarbayev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nurali Aliyev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nurali Aliyev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Serikbek Daukeev[edit]

Hello, Agneta 92,

Thank you for creating Serikbek Daukeev.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please remove peacock and promotional words from the "Biography" section. Things like "His experience as a scientist, operations expert and manager ensured his success in the role of the akim of the..." are peacock and promo.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]