User talk:Agentscott00

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help feel free to drop a line at my talk page. :) --Actown ^e 23:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

um..[edit]

This is sorta a long time ago, but what did i remove from Runescape???? Davud363000 03:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

k thank you i thought i had copied that to be put somewhere else on the page.

Davud363000 02:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

We may not always see completely eye to eye, but thank you for your work keeping the RuneScape articles clean. It seems as if you care as much as I do. LOL. Anyway, if you see me in the game, please say 'Hi'. 66.210.174.40 17:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"GM" is not Shadoom!!![edit]

You have recently accused me of being the same person as "GM" THAT IS NOT TRUE, the reason that we have the same IP is because we go to the same school and have been assined the same computer (or he has somehow made his IP the same as my schools), I am sorry that he is insulting people but I can't stop him.

You also accused me of purposly offending people, I might of, but you clearly indicated that you belived me to be dumb and immature, I would assume that you would be capable of realising that I consider that to be offencive, you were also implying that my opinions were less important than yours, which is both ignorent and unfair Shadoom1 00:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re from Storkian: An offense is an offense. A vandal is a vandal. Sorry kid but these are rules of computer science and the first one is you cannot have 2 users on one computer in wikipedia! (unless you have windows xp). Try to back up your argument and tell an admin and they will help you.

--[[User:Storkian|Storkian] 12:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Teenager from Toronto

RuneScape edits[edit]

Hi, I hope this is the correct way to send a message.

I did explain on the talk page why I reverted the changes. It was only 1 person edits I reverted because they had introduced so many mistakes and removed so much good content. It's completely demoralizing to spend hours trying to get the article accurate, neutral and well written to see it uniliterally destroyed by the edits of one person. And then be told off for trying to revert it! I certainly don't claim to own this article, but neither does he. Frankly it was him who was deleting huge swathes of other peoples work, I just reverted one persons over enthusiastic changes back to the consensus that had been reached before. I'm not going to get into a stupid revert war by reverting it again, but if everyone else really agrees those changes are for the better and this is the way you want to go I'm certainly not going to waste on more time trying to make wikipedia accurate just to have it all undone. Runefire

Actually, you reverted a few peoples' edits. A copy of RuneScape was made on a subpage in Makoto's userspace, and a few users contributed to it there before he copied the final page over to the main article. Like I said before, you could have at least just undone a few bits of it, not reverted the whole thing. You did nothing except revert a large amount of work that a few users did, I hardly see how you can think your work was undone. Agentscott00^{(talk contribs)} 16:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape![edit]

Hi! I notice you play RuneScape. Maybe you might like to take a look at the Runescape wiki and think about joining us? Just a thought. Hope to see you there. Megalodon99 Talk 14:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Visited the earlier wikipedia pages on runescape which contained interesting information, although it was mostly relevant to players. I like the new wikipedia entry a lot. Is there an archive of the earlier content. The site mentioned above may be able to re-use some of that material. --Miw 14:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German Wiki[edit]

German Wiki

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/24._September_2006#Kategorie:Wikipedian_unterst.C3.BCtzt_Lesben-_und_Schwulenbewegung_.28gel.C3.B6scht.29

Some people try to delete category:Wikipedian support gay community: please help GLGerman 14:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanx Alot![edit]

I am going to make you the leader of this project (runescape). You have helped alot :-). Oh and I do not edit wikipedia that often so please take care of the project for me.

Remember to mention that we founded this project!

--[[User:Storkian|Storkian] 12:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Proposed deletion of Table of Runescape Weapons[edit]

Understood.

KING ALEX 56 RULES!!!!!!!! 02:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why not make it into a redirect to Runescape Weapons (or whatever the article is.)?

Kingalex56 22:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RuneScape[edit]

I notice you just reverted a correction I made, but didn't mention why. Please could you explain why you did this? The previous person who made such a reversion said they did so by mistake, but I was a bit surprised after reinstating it to see another person revert it. I'm sure the first version was as a university undergraduate because Andrew's uni homepage a) said he went to uni from 1997-2000 and b) had pictures of deviousMUD (not RuneScape) all over it. Indeed that's where that deviousMUD picture came from. Runefire 09:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject MMO Newsletter - April 2007[edit]

WikiProject MMO Quarterly
April 2007		Issue I

About Us
WikiProject MMO Quarterly is a quarterly newsletter posted on the first of January, April, July, and October. The newsletter is written by any and all interested members of WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games for members of the project and interested Wikipedians outside of the project.
Questions, comments, and concerns
For general questions, comments, and concerns, leave a message on our talk page here. For questions, comments, and concerns about our newsletter, leave a message on the talk page for the newsletter section of our Outreach Department here.
New good articles and featured articles
Good articles and featured articles are a great way to see what major acomplishments we have made over the last quarter. Good articles Final Fantasy XI Massively multiplayer online role-playing game RuneScape World of Warcraft Featured articles None this quarter!
Role call
We ask that within a month, all members sign our role call to show that they are still active participants in the project. More information is available on the role call page.

Major news
WikiProject RuneScape, our former child project, was moved to become a task force of this project in January as it had a small scope but the task force is still going strong to this very day. This past quarter marks the beginning of our new collaboration system MMOGCM. Past collaborations thus far have been World of Warcraft and MMORPG, both of which made it to GA status while it was the MMOGCM. As well, we now have an Outreach Department which works on this newsletter as well as spreads the word of our project. WikiProject MMO is also now a participant in the Work via WikiProjects division of Wikipedia 1.0 and as such, we will be helping decide which are the best (based on quality and importance) articles within our scope. Project members can discuss which articles are to be included here.
News from the RuneScape Task Force
We are currently trying to improve this task force so that we can edit all RuneScape-related articles in an organized manner. To do that we started a massive overhaul which we invite all task force members to participate in. We have also gotten our main article, RuneScape to good article status this quarter. All this, and the task force was only created in January.
Signed...
Greeves, Ed On behalf of WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games.

To change your personal newsletter distribution preferences, please see the newsletter page from the Outreach Department.

Image:Bbp.gif[edit]

Hello, Agentscott00. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bbp.gif) was found at the following location: User:Agentscott00/sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Jagexgif.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jagexgif.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Panser Born- (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jagexgif.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jagexgif.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Panser Born- (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]