User talk:Acbaile5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2020[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:IPv6 are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While it is true that Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED, there also is no WP:FREESPEECH here. While I love your enthusiasm, we cannot include your content because, firstly, you have not satisfied the burden of demonstrating verifiability of your claims in reliable sources. We cannot take original research. On a related note, Wikipedia's purpose isn't to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, such as your perceived problems with IPv6. All of these are project policies or guidelines, and all content must comply with them (although we can sometimes ignore policies, they must be for the overall good of the project and must not go against what this project is about, see Wikipedia:Five pillars). I am writing counterarguments to all of your comments for your own aid, since I think you could benefit from better educating yourself about how computer networking works. But so far you have refused to listen to anything I write to you. I hope you deviate from that and read all of the links I posted here, because they explain exactly why we cannot include your content, and also why we cannot be having this conversation on the talk page. If you want to learn more about computer networking and have specific questions, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing. I don't want to do this, but if you keep advocating your view without reliable sources, such comments will be removed. Know too that, while your particular case isn't getting there yet, people who do not comply have been blocked for this kind of advocacy.

Please please do not make me consider having that happen. Wikipedia cannot be built without volunteers like you, and me, but that does not confer you an unconditional right to edit the way you have lately.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]