User talk:66.192.63.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of the United States (1945–1964), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: History of the United States (1945–1964) was changed by 66.192.63.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-01T21:11:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. These people don't fool around at all. Your recent edit to Rifts has been reverted as vandalism, any more of that and some Admin will BLOCK you, usually starting with a 48 hr. block. After that, and you continue the vandalism, you WILL GET BANNED by the Admins on here. If your intent is humor, try Uncyclopedia and/or Encyclopedia Dramatica. Powerzilla (talk) 08:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Champions League 2009–10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Raymond Giggs 17:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Oklahoma City bombing. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted three times by two editors now at Oklahoma City bombing, and if you add the content again without discussing it first on the talk page, you may be blocked for your three reverts. Discuss why you believe the content should be removed and consensus can determine whether it should be removed or not. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 18:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Oklahoma City bombing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 18:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of much longer in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 20:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring[edit]

You appear to be involved in a long-term edit war on David Souter. This is in violation of our policies: WP:EW, WP:TE, and I believe WP:NPOV. When your block expires, you should not continue this without reaching consensus on the talk page. If you continue, you will likely have an extended block imposed on this IP address. Toddst1 (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010[edit]

  1. Your recent edit to the page Colin Farrell appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.--Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 16:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of programs broadcast by This TV. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powergate92Talk 03:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of DirecTV channels (United States). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

stop being an idiot.[edit]

thanks.--Milowenthasspoken 21:09, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Automatic call distributor, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Velella  Velella Talk   21:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of archaeological sites by country may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Suchilquitongo ((archaeological site)]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 1996 Summer Olympics because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm PCHS-NJROTC. An edit that you recently made to University of South Carolina seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) Jesus Christ loves you! 18:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of South Carolina with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, American Pit Bull Terrier, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent edits to South Carolina State Fair[edit]

Hello! I wanted to let you know why I reverted your edits to the page South Carolina State Fair. Wikipedia has strict guidelines regarding copyrights and I noticed that the information you added to the article was directly copied from the source. When using sources, it's common practice to capture the essence of the information and write it in one's own words. That way, there is no copyright infringement and the content is safe to stay. By "own words", I dont mean tweaking sentences just a little since that would be close paraphrasing and still count as a violation. If you have any questions, feel free to post them at the Teahouse. Alternately, you can also ask them on my talk page and I'll try my best to help you. Happy editing! Jiten talk contribs 07:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Reyk YO! 14:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]