User talk:2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tim Hiller—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 23:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know we got the /40 account creation ban lifted, but I am requesting it is on the /48, even with checkuser information of abuse of multiple accounts, because the range is still large and you cannot edit here thanks to the /40 block coupled with it. ACC might deny an account as there is CU evidence against this, and I do request a CU review this.2600:387:F:5A10:0:0:0:6 (talk) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per the CU response below and at User talk:2600:387:15:2D1B:0:0:0:2. — xaosflux Talk 14:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Checkuser note: I've already reviewed this block. SQLQuery Me! 18:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]