User talk:204.85.24.5/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Imperialism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Imperialism was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-07-20T05:42:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Sam Wu constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sam Wu. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 16:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Sam Wu, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 03:19, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Midget has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 02:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Midget constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bfigura's puppy (talk) 02:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Birth-Mark, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Birth-Mark was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-11T17:11:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Mental confusion constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 19:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. leujohn (talk, contribs) 13:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Watt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ideal gas law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Eldereft (cont.) 19:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to James T. Kirk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kandi Burruss has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/kandionline).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John C. Calhoun has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dogposter 21:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Ackermann function. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Assassin's Creed II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Assassin's Creed II was changed by 204.85.24.5 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-04T21:36:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Teabagging, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Richard Gay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Richard Gay (rugby league). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to El DeBarge. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ZacBowling (user|talk) 03:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dita Formánková has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sufjan Stevens has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Signature song. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Because of your track record of warnings, I think it's fair to assume you're aware that adding unsourced material is not helpful in the slightest, and if you continue you will indeed be held accountable. Geeky Randy (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Entourage (TV series) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 03:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Jason Smith (American basketball), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ZamorakO o (talk) 03:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philadelphia Experiment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 20:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Utah with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 04:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I am r000t (talk) 04:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Richard Dawkins, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Galivants Ferry, South Carolina constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Mann jess. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Star Trek into Darkness because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 05:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Invisible ink. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism and make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (204.85.24.5) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Jackson Peebles (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 16:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Balsam, North Carolina, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 15:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Balsam, North Carolina. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

January 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 18:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your further edit to Aggregate supply constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Aggregate supply with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 19:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did again to Aggregate supply, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Military use of children. Josh3580talk/hist 19:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ardrey Kell High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Deadbeef 21:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm War wizard90. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to James C. Brincefield, Jr. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oil drop experiment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kkmurray (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gavin Andrews (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 03:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TCMemoire. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Laura Bush— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – TCMemoire 05:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Contributor321 (talk) 01:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gavin Andrews[edit]

Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gavin Andrews".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Stickee (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 04:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akira Arimura has been accepted[edit]

Akira Arimura, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred W. Allendorf has been accepted[edit]

Fred W. Allendorf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jet fuel— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe talk 20:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Laura Bush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert W. Alexander[edit]

Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert W. Alexander".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Edward H. Adelson concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edward H. Adelson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert W. Alexander concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert W. Alexander, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Edward H. Adelson[edit]

Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edward H. Adelson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert W. Alexander[edit]

Hello, 204.85.24.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert W. Alexander".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Just Do It have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Just Do It. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Just Do It. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics. Plandu (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:204.85.24.5/Archive_2&oldid=1142309561"