User talk:203.87.181.218

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User:Pinoybandwagon will retire 2 days from now because he will be having a vacation in Bataan. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 10:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block should be expired a while ago, April 9 10:22 am. Since the time today is 3:30 pm.

Decline reason:

see below. -- lucasbfr talk 07:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As this IP has apparently been used for sockpuppetry (leading to multiple account blocks), I've blocked all editing from this IP for one week. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, fuck! I wanted to be unblocked right now! 203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked for a long time already.

Decline reason:

You are blocked due to abusing multiple accounts, I don't think unblocking you will do any good at this stage. -- lucasbfr talk 07:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking me will do any good at this stage. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This time[edit]

I should be unblocked by TODAY or TOMORROW because UNBLOCKING WILL REALLY DO GOOD TO ME AT THIS STAGE. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 08:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked for 1 month already. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block expires later today; there is no reason to unblock early. Sam Korn (smoddy) 10:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Auto[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
203.87.181.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Martindanza". The reason given for Martindanza's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".


Decline reason: This IP address has been used extensively by a banned user and this autoblock demonstrates that he is still active on this IP. Unblock declined. Sam Korn (smoddy) 09:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

203.87.181.218 (talk) 08:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to be unblocked later today.

Decline reason:

No reason to unblock. Due to abuse of the {{unblock}} template, this page has been protected for the duration of the autoblock. Sam Korn (smoddy) 10:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

203.87.181.218 (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There are reasons why YOU SHOULD UNBLOCK ME:
1. It is User:Orangemike's fault.
2. I did not do anything wrong.

Decline reason:

Inadequate reason; see User:Sandstein/Unblock. —  Sandstein  06:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UNBLOCK ME[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit that I abused multiple accounts as another Pinoybandwagon sock. I am here to make and Improve true articles. I intend to help contribute to the encyclopedia by putting them where it belongs.

Decline reason:

Each block is caused by you abusing sockpuppet accounts. Each time you create or use a sock, you get another block on this IP. The fact that you're still autoblocked on this IP seems to indicate that this message has not yet sunk in. — ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 11:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ang Huling El Bimbo, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]