User talk:2001:569:57B2:4D00:E033:E427:5656:B63

March 22

You need to read wp:npa and wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 15:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't actually give a fck about your policies, though, lmao. Ironic that by mindlessly linking Wiki policies like a braindead midwit you're just proving my point as to pathetic most Wiki editors are. 2001:569:57B2:4D00:E033:E427:5656:B63 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

The deeply ironic thing is this entire website is one big soapbox for Western corporate propaganda. 2001:569:57B2:4D00:E033:E427:5656:B63 (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Then you will get a ban. This will be my last commemt here, either obey out policies or I will report you. Slatersteven (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

You're such a tool. "Obey the policies" lmao, authoritarian regimes exist precisely because of blind followers like you. So naturally subservenient, so sensitive to any thought that challenges the mainstream preconceptions. Oh, and you say want to ban me? I've been banned previously and another anonymous IP too (my former username is CompactSpacez). It's useless. There is nothing you can do get rid of me. I'll always exist to point out how sad and pathetic Wikipedia editors are. 2001:569:57B2:4D00:E033:E427:5656:B63 (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Ohh and

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Slatersteven (talk) 15:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

As you have not been warned about DS yes

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Slatersteven (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

---