User talk:188.176.129.120

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (188.176.129.120) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Hi!

Thank you for improving Schwarzbraun ist die Haselnuss. Now there's another good reason for me to get Hearts of Iron :P
Cheers :-). -- Pulsarwind (talk) 00:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mesopotamia region in Argentina[edit]

According to the article, and to everything I've ever seen, Mesopotamia is Entre Ríos, Corrientes, and Misiones - not Santa Fe, Chaco, and Formosa. The article was written when I got to it, but the original intent was to say that the three Mesopotamian provinces share certain characteristics with the next group of provinces to the west (which I've just edited it again to suggest). Do you like this way better? PhainetaiMoi (talk) 13:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see now that you are right, and that Mesopotamia is Entre Ríos, Corrientes, and Misiones. Your first edit (and also your second) was perfectly valid, and I just had a brain fart. Your second edit is nice. I'm sorry for my mistake. 188.176.129.120 (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers - that happens to me too sometimes, and I'm glad you like the way it is now. PhainetaiMoi (talk) 17:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Petronila Beneš[edit]

If you peruse the referenced marriage record, the surname is Beneš. Petronila is a middle given name.Eykeklos Omnia (talk) 09:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

County Town of Surrey?[edit]

Hi. The discussion I was thinking of is at the Guildford talk pge and is archived. My bad. I should have checked. I used to assume the same but Talk:Guildford/Archive 1#County Town makes this look uncertain. I think the status quo version "popularly considered" is adaquate rather than making an assertion that is dubious and unnecesary. If you want to change it please join the discussion.Charles (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. No problem with the not checking. My most recent change to the "Surrey" page's second paragraph was this:
Guildford was historically considered the county town of Surrey, and is still popularly considered to be the county town. However, Surrey County Council is based in Kingston upon Thames, which since 1965 has been part of Greater London, meaning it is located outside the administrative area of Surrey. With a population of 1.1 million, Surrey is the third-most-populous county in the South East.
And just for reference, the paragraph originally said:
The county town is popularly considered to be Guildford although Surrey County Council is based in Kingston upon Thames, which since 1965 has been a part of Greater London. With a population of 1.1 million, Surrey is the third-most-populous county in the South East.
After having read the discussion at the "Guildford" talk page, I see that the whole question is rather complex. Would you object to the following phrasing?
Guildford is popularly considered the county town of Surrey. However, Surrey County Council is based in Kingston upon Thames, which since 1965 has been part of Greater London, meaning it is located outside the administrative area of Surrey. With a population of 1.1 million, Surrey is the third-most-populous county in the South East.
Thank you for reaching out to me.188.176.129.120 (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me.Charles (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ludhiana without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry[edit]

Sorry for removing your Sherlock Holmes canon images in the process of cleaning up the Canon of Sherlock Holmes. TuckerResearch (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it was an honest mistake. But thank you for acknowledging it.188.176.129.120 (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Abortion survivor" category[edit]

Also, in relation to to your earlier question, meeting your Governor or legislator, in my experience, depends on your state's population. My U.S. state is on the lower-end of the list of populated states, so I've met my Governor several times, my House Representative, and other State legislators. (Decided to respond here on your talk page per WP:FORUM.) Nice4What (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nice4What: Not to read you the RIOT act, but this seems like a violation of WP:Canvassing. I can see this is a good faith effort to notify an interested in this topic area, though. However, please refrain from inviting users to participate based solely on the opinions they hold. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:21, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know! Nice4What (talk) 02:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the comment I left for you on your talk page. - 188.176.129.120 (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
My apologies for reverting your change on Heartbeat bill. As other IP editors may be able to tell you, IP discrimination is a real thing. I am rather surprised that not only have I made such error myself, but I reverted a constructive edit in the course of this process. You have my humblest apologies. Thank you for all your wonderful work and your insightful comments! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:05, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the comment I left for you on your talk page. - 188.176.129.120 (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (188.176.129.120) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! TheDoDahMan (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


June 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Anger, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sophiajoanne (talk) 01:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
@Sophiajoanne: What are you talking about? This edit did not seem all that problematic to me. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MJL: I'm not sure but the user seems to added unnecessary words into the article (Refer to [1]. However is this just worth a revert and not a warning? If you think it's not worth a warning I can revert the warning.Sophiajoanne (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Sophiajoanne: I'd just strike out the warning and/or {{hat}} this conversation, but yeah. The user is somewhat established (see my barnstar to them) and the contribution was made more than two weeks ago. Either way, reverting now probably would probably lead to confusion. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MJL: Ok. Thank you.Sophiajoanne (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:188.176.129.120&oldid=904131745"