User talk:107.2.190.142

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello 107.2.190.142!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (107.2.190.142) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 12:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

December 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Satoshi Tajiri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Chipped beef. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Chipped beef. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United States Coast Guard. Jim1138 (talk) 09:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tapentadol. - theWOLFchild 12:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Naloxone. - theWOLFchild 12:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bass Pro Shops, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - theWOLFchild 12:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit Summary[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page Preview[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic editing from this account[edit]

Of late, the person or persons editing with account have made numerous edits that were not in compliance with Wikipedia's standards, and it's Policies & Guidelines, specifically in regards to Reliable Sources and the Manual of Style. Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before editing further. There is a great deal of useful information to assist you in the 'welcome' template above, in the numerous notices and warnings posted here as well as in the links in this comment. Know that competency is required to contribute to this project. A great deal of your edits have had to be reverted, causing work for others. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you will very likely be blocked from editing. Thank you - theWOLFchild 12:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes to this article are yet another example of the problematic editing coming from this account. No edit summaries, obviously did not use the preview function, and the changes made did not serve as any kind of improvement, they instead needed to be corrected, again creating work for other editors. If this disruption continues, this account will be reported and very likely blocked from editing. Again, please follow the editing guidelines of this project. Thank you - theWOLFchild 02:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That content was stated in the next paragraph. Please don't be repetitious. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 00:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm L293D. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Policy of deliberate ambiguity, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. L293D () 02:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Target Receptor Affinities[edit]

Is anyone able to procure and add data regarding the affinity of levomepromazine at its clinically significant target receptors?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably ask this on the Talk:Levomepromazine page. fyi - wolf 21:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Serious issues[edit]

The "Outbreaks of Coronavirus Disease" section chart doesn't even have a total estimated infections column to give the number of deaths context which makes it relatively useless data and only causes panic in readers. I thank whoever flagged the "Cure" section as unrelated, however there are several treatments which may be beneficial in the treatment of many coronaviruses such as Remdesivir which has shown effectiveness against SARS, MERS, and covid-19. The "Cure" section should be renamed as "Treatments" or "Potential Treatments" and completely re-written to discuss the current treatment regimens that have shown reasonable effectiveness in Coronaviruses in general with anything related to Covid-19/SARS2 being purged from the page. In the interest of eliminating fear-mongering in this article I would recommend increased editing controls by the Wikipedia staff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 (talk) 00:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Statements[edit]

"In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of all planets and most other objects, except many comets, are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates. Except for Venus and Uranus, planetary rotations are also prograde." - This is a strongly misleading statement which will confuse most readers and result in incorrect interpretations.

I would suggest: "In our Solar System, the orbits about the Sun of most objects including all planets (except Venus and Uranus), are prograde, i.e. in the same direction as the Sun rotates.

I posted this but this article seems to be aggresively monitored and unedited so that required clarifications are immediately reversed... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.2.190.142 (talk) 06:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ComplexRational. Your recent edit(s) to the page Retrograde and prograde motion appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 11:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.