User talk:1.42.125.232

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (1.42.125.232) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Dcirovic (talk) 05:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of longest-serving soap opera actors— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Qantas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Adam Willits. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Shane Porteous page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Peter Carroll (actor)

I undid your edit to Peter Carroll (actor) as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability. Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources. See Help:Referencing for beginners, Help:Citation Style 1 and wp:Inline citations. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Don Crosby. Jim1138 (talk) 02:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

BTW: Fixed the ref error. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Wall of text

Would you please format Don Crosby into paragraphs and maybe a couple of sections? It is a wall of text. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Barrie Cassidy

I undid your edit to Barrie Cassidy as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability. Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources. See Help:Referencing for beginners, Help:Citation Style 1 and wp:Inline citations. Jim1138 (talk) 10:18, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism warning (July 2016)

Please desist from editing disruptively; if you continue, this IP will be blocked from editing. Quis separabit? 19:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Trooper (band). Mlpearc (open channel) 21:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Anne Haddy page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Pat McDonald (actress) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yumi Stynes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 23:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Editorializing

Your recent editing history at Murder_of_Anita_Cobby shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please refrain from Editorializing articles, e.g saying "Genocide is evil" is Editorializing, you should state xyz says genocide is evil— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eng.M.Bandara (talk • contribs) 07:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 09:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jane Grey (actress) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jane Grey (actress) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.flickr.com/photos/19603157@N03/2468437925/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jimmy Governor— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marvellous Spider-Man 06:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism warning (September 2016)

Please desist from editing disruptively, as you did at The Lady Chablis. If you continue, this IP will be blocked from editing. Quis separabit? 11:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Your recent editing history at Darlinghurst Gaol shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Adding dates to residents

Adding dates to notable residents is unnecessary and largely irrelevant and can be misleading. There is no real precedent for this. Take a look at List of people from Sheffield or List of people from Leeds, etc. Also, you need to be careful with your formatting, it seems inconsistent at best. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bevan Lee— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 21:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of people with the longest marriages, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brian Wenzel. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 22:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please desist from editing disruptively, as you did at Richard Arvine Overton‎. If you continue, this IP will be blocked from editing.Inception2010 (talk) 02:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Please desist from editing disruptively, as you did at Ken Sutcliffe. If you continue, this IP will be blocked from editing. Sophoife (talk) 02:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ross Higgins— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 07:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Ross Higgins

http://deadobituary.com/ross-higgins-australian-actor-died-at-86/ gives 1930 as DOB. A text search of your "Ref 10" does not seem to mention a DOB. "193" says "not found" Please wp:Ping Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Steve Popovich. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 08:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Robert Tudawali. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Tudawali.
Read it. There is no mention of "Bobby "Bob" Wilson" There is a Bobby or Wilson but nothing about a Bob. Also, there is other questionable content. Jim1138 (talk) 07:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please reuse references

See WP:NAMEDREFS. Please don't tell people to go find it for themselves. That is not citing a source and makes wp:verifiability difficult. A simple explanation: <ref> *Ref info* </ref> Change to <ref name="Banzo"> *Ref info* </ref> "Banzo" is a name you give. Then to reuse, just add <ref name="Banzo"/> Order is unimportant reuse may go before or after. Don't forget the slash "/" Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Warning

Please desist from editing disruptively, as you did at Margaret Ann Neve. If you continue, this IP will be blocked from editing.Inception2010 (talk) 12:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.125.232 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What is the un sourced content?

Decline reason:

No reason given to consider an unblock. Yamla (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.125.232 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Will try to be more careful in future, and add more references

Decline reason:

Just trying is insufficient. Adding appropriate and valid references is imperative. If you cannot do so, do not post the article.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, M. Lincoln Schuster, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

---