User talk:Σύμμαχος

Welcome[edit]

Hi Σύμμαχος, and welcome to Wikipedia. What do you need help with? Dekkappai (talk) 00:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Σύμμαχος. I moved the article to The Battle of Dasman, and did some copyedit on the text. You will have to add some sourcing-- news or other writings-- in order to keep the article on Wikipedia.

To get some help on how to edit articles here, Welcome to Wikipedia might help, particularly Wikipedia:Five pillars. I won't be able to help with the article, because I'm not a history/politics person. Good luck! Dekkappai (talk) 01:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK-- I can't read Arabic at all, but I tried to add it as a source. I don't know if I did it right at all, because I have no knowledge at all in this area... You can probably find an editor who is better able to help you at one of the related WikiProjects. You might ask someone at Category:WikiProject Iraq participants, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Kuwait, or in one of the other projects listed under Category:WikiProject Middle East. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 01:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of the Bridges[edit]

Eh, how do you get the idea that I could help you with that article? To be honest, this is way out of my expertise, so I doubt that I could contribute a lot to it. (Lord Gøn (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I guess for this kind of job it would be better to ask someone whose native language actually is English. Chances are high that I would overlook something or make just another mistake while trying to fix one. (Lord Gøn (talk) 18:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I'll help you with The Battle of the Bridges if you wish. I'm a history/politics/military person and I know a good deal of the background. What's your source for this article? Buckshot06 (talk) 07:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please always when you use such sources, add the exact name, author, and title of the book to the article. Otherwise the information could have come from - a chatroom discussion, or somebody talking with their friends. Due to WP:V, we must cite sources. Please add the details of both books, the Kuwaiti and the Iraqi, as soon as possible. Kind regards from New Zealand, Buckshot06 (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Battle of Jahra[edit]

I have nominated Battle of Jahra, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jahra. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. fetchcomms☛ 04:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

You are welcome, as a matter of interest, why did you ask me ? Djln Djln (talk) 19:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Failaka[edit]

I reviewed the article per your request, see Battle of Failaka.Greyshark09 (talk) 19:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload at the Ikhwan Revolt article[edit]

I saw your excellent picture upload at the Arabic version of the "Ikhwan Revolt" article (of Faisal al-Dawish), though i was for some reason unable to use this pic in the English version, could you fix it? Shuqra'an KbirGreyshark09 (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thousand and one nights[edit]

It seems that I am forbidden to touch the page! fine.. can you make it clear that the "Kitab" means book? (Kitāb alf laylah wa-laylah) means "book of One Thousand and One Nights".. one last thing i reall don't want to engage in controversy (and my english doesn't help me!) therefore, please be flexible.. my request is very simple, Thanks in advance --Σύμμαχος (talk) 06:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course "Kitab" means "book" - people who perhaps know no other word of Arabic tend to be aware of that one, I think. Not a matter of being "flexible". The point is that in this case (as in some others) the word "book" is part of the title - or at least we have been treating it as such. Of course you are allowed to change any article - but every now and then you may be asked to justify your changes - as I have said in two edit summaries - do this on the talk page of the article (top left hand corner, next to the "article" tab). As you will notice, the titles used in the first line of the article have been subject to endless controversy - which is why, having acheived a measure of stability on this point, you will need to convince others that the word "Book" does not form a regular part of the title in Arabic. You may very well be right - just that we need to get confirmation (perhaps the title page of a couple of Arabic editions that do not include the word "Kitab", but present the title without it??)--Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see this.. There are many examples if you want or search in Google in Arabic (ألف ليلة وليلة) --Σύμμαχος (talk) 12:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprising, surely? Even if the word "Kitab" were a part of the usual title? That's all you're querying, isn't it? I am copying this to the talk page for the article - where, as I keep saying - this belongs. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nader Shah's invasion of India, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nader Shah's invasion of India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notifications - India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (and more)[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Also, please include reliable sources to support your claims. You've made a number of edits and claims about Nader Shah's invasion of India but have not provided any sources. In the future, please do include sources and seek consensus for your changes. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because due to previous issues, and this edit after your block was released, it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]