User talk:YungNwise

Welcome!

Hello, YungNwise, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jamaicans did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 22:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mauritian Creoles, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cafres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malagasy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Landroving Linguist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Languages of Africa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LandLing 18:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Languages of Africa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LandLing 09:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: In your edit summary, you complain that your edit has been "unfairly" removed. This is not the case - it has been removed because it does not adhere to the rules of Wikipedia. I don't know how much Bantu ancestry is in the Malagassy population. I did not remove your edit because I believe it to be wrong (it may be), but because you did not provide a reliable source for it. You reinserted the very same information, again without providing a source. If you keep doing this, it will be seen as WP:disruptive editing. LandLing 09:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are continually adding unsourced material or making changes in sourced material with no rationale

This cannot go on. If you can't comply with our policies you don't belong here. Doug Weller talk 10:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller This is still going on despite the notices about policy, take this rather blatant WP:OR. TylerBurden (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TylerBurden@YungNwise blocked from article space. If they build up a good record of using article talk pages to suggest changes with a reliable sources then they can ask to be unblocked. Doug Weller talk 15:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sourced material is the SAME source already provided. Simply the CORRECT information. You denying facts simply cause they're not sourced to your liking is kind problematic. You're response is very aggressive and considering the topic, kind of prejudice. I've tried fixing it and it doesn't make you happy. I'm not sure what else to do YungNwise (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do what I suggested. You've got a pattern of this and I'm not the only one who has seen it, so your claims don't mean much. I have no idea what you are talking about when you mention "topic" and "prejudice". Doug Weller talk 07:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have yet to explain exactly where I edited anything without sorces. And you and the person ganging up on me are the ONLY two people who have ever said anything to me. How do I "do what you suggested" if I'm blocked? I'm not allowed to do anything, so how can I work to be unblocked when there is no process for that? It's simply whenever you feel like unblocking me. So, as I said before, I'm confused. YungNwise (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear from this talk page other people pointed out your unsourced editing, so it is not two people "ganging up on you", and you ignored everything until you were blocked. There is an unblock process actually if you would read the block notice. TylerBurden (talk) 22:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for Inability to follow sourcing policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]