User talk:Yeszzzz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Yeszzzz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Piri Reis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Kurdistan topics. Doug Weller talk 17:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you add “Kurdish” or “Kurd”etc you’ll be blocked[edit]

Unless you have multiple sources that meet our criteria Doug Weller talk 17:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have no source he was turkish, he’s literally Kurdish Yeszzzz (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case it shouldn't be hard to find sources that say as much, at which point the article can be changed. Happy days AntiDionysius (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are sources in the article. Doug Weller talk 17:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by calling me a nomad[edit]

Doug Weller talk 17:37, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a turk? Yeszzzz (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That’s an inappropriate question and none of your business. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Eurocopter EC120 Colibri. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 18:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, it’s not actually unsourced,the Kurdistan Regional Government Traffic police’s main helicopter is ec colobri and you can search it for yourself Yeszzzz (talk) 16:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yeszzzz That's no the way we work. You need to provide a reliably published source. If you can do that, then great! Doug Weller talk 16:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know but it’s really hard to find sources about it the official government doesn’t post anything about it other than pictures they only post pictures about it if you can remove the block I appreciate it Yeszzzz (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above block has expired. If you want to be unblocked follow the instructions below and explain what you did wrong and what you will do differently. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I said the officials don’t post informations about it and I really cannot post fake and unofficial sources, I will try talking to officers and add official sources and if you unblock I appreciate it Yeszzzz (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot post fake and unofficial sources, you should not be adding content from them. Aintabli (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yeszzzz you are blocked because you continued to post unsourced text after warnings. Doug Weller talk 20:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 16:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yeszzzz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello dear Kylie, can I know what are my mistakes in the article I really don’t understand? Yeszzzz (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They may not be watching this page. Use reply in the future. Click reply, click the little person with a +sign, start tidying the name and it should fill it in. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can I know what is missing within my Article what should I add more? Yeszzzz (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Remove Facebook as a reference. The reliability of world-defence.com is disputed. Wikipedia may not be used as a reference- WP:CIRCILAR applies
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can I know why world defence.com is disputed? Yeszzzz (talk) 16:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To quote them, "World Defense is a discussion board for enthusiasts and professionals to discuss topics on world affairs" We don't use discussion boards as sources. Doug Weller talk 07:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello dear Doug, I want to edit the Peshmerga Air Support Command but it doesn’t let me and it says I’ve been blocked till 2025 for no reason, can you help please Yeszzzz (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Link? Doug Weller talk 13:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peshmerga/Kurdistan Air Support Command has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peshmerga/Kurdistan Air Support Command. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peshmerga Air Support Command has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peshmerga Air Support Command. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Boeing CH-47 Chinook[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Boeing CH-47 Chinook, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Heckler & Koch G36[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Heckler & Koch G36, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peshmerga/Kurdistan Air Support Command (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
For a Wikipedia article to be published, it must be about a notable subject. A subject is notable if it has significant coverage in several independent, reliable sources. Coverage of a subject is significant if the subject is covered in depth in the source; passing mentions and routine news stories are generally not significant. The sources cited here do not discuss the article subject—that is, the Air Support Command—in depth; rather, they discuss routine arms deals.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
voorts (talk/contributions) 23:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I have added every cites needed and all proofs are accurate can I know why it’s being declined? Yeszzzz (talk) 14:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurdistan Air Support Command (November 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I can see the misuse of this article. The draft states "4 of NH90’s and 4 of A129 were given to Peshmerga Air Support Command". However, the article used to reference this statement indicates that the helicopters were deployed with Italian military personnel, not given to any Kurdish unit. The rest of the material is similarly malsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 23:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Please cease editing articles to add unsourced information to suggest that Kurdistan is an independent country or should be referred to as though it were one. Wikipedia is not a place to make a point, see WP:NOTADVOCACY. Additionally, edits like those you made to Draft:Kurdistan Air Support Command misrepresent the contents of sources provided. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Aintabli (talk) 20:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurdistan Air Support Command (November 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Since last submission, there has been the addition of 1.) copyright-violating images, 2.) additional unsourced material, and 3.) a reference emanating from an Internet forum (see WP:SELFPUB). This is teetering towards rejection due to an evident lack of sourcing to confirm this group exists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What should I do the get copy right permission for the Peshmerga Air Support Command Insignia/Logo? Yeszzzz (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If your draft is approved, there is a process described on this policy page. Essentially, the procedure is to upload a very low-resolution version of the image (think 100 pixels by 100 pixels) directly to Wikipedia, rather than to the Commons, as you did with those three images. If your draft is approved, send me the online sources for these images and I can walk through the process with you! ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright and can I please know why my draft isn’t being approved I provided every sources I’m just trying to show the world my nation just like the others Yeszzzz (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft needs to follow policy regarding reliable sources in order to meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability. Additionally, while I am sympathetic towards the Kurdish cause for independence for private reasons, your stated desire of just trying to show the world my nation just like the others suggests you may need to consider reviewing this policy. All these policies have been linked in previous messages to you. You have been repeatedly blocked for previous violations of at least two of these policies. I encourage you to hold off on editing until you can confidently say you understand the contents of these policies. Other things worth knowing before editing are found here. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But what In trying to make does exist and has no connection to ‘’Kurdish independence’’ it’s connected to Ministry of Peshmerga and the Kurdistan Regional Government, I added all the reliable recourses on its existence and I literally put its emblem which is the official emblem and all the photos I added does show that it exists Yeszzzz (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The sources you added are largely unreliable. Additionally, it appears that you misread at least one source such that you said it verified a claim that it in fact didn't. Please, read (or re-read) this explanation of what is a reliable source. Also, I notice that many of your edits contain grammatical errors that suggest English might not be your first language. That's totally OK—English Wikipedia welcomes editors of all backgrounds to contribute to our shared mission of expanding freely accessible knowledge! However, if English is indeed not a language you have totally mastered, I highly encourage you to at first edit on a Wikipedia that uses a language you're more familiar with. Doing so will help you build up an understanding of universal Wikipedia policies without possible language barriers. With that said, if you feel confident in your English ability, please feel welcome to continue contributing. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The website I gave as cite are reliable with pictures of you check them it’s all reliable and confirmed resources I can send many other pictures if you want Yeszzzz (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources in that draft mention an entity known as the "Kurdistan Air Support Command". Some mention the counter-terror groups, some mention the peshmerga more generally, but none mention the subject of your draft. Some of these sources flat-out state different things than what you have cited them as saying (for example, the Italians sent Italian-manned Chinooks to support their own troops fighting in the Kurdish region). Other sources are blogs or otherwise self-published and are thus not reliable sources. I am afraid that this has been explained too many times now without you understanding. Further violations of sourcing policy will likely result in a block. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t write the draft as Kurdistan Air Support it was Peshmerga Air Support just like the emblem states and the pictures does mention it and not self published, I’m sure you can see the pictures, the logos on it and the flag on the aircraft’s and the chinooks aren’t ‘’Italian troops’’ they gave it to peshmerga Yeszzzz (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have again put unverified material into articles and misused a source in another. This is a final warning to follow Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and reliability. You are also warned against uploading copyrighted images to both Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Commons. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t add anything since, what do you mean by final warning?? Yeszzzz (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which article made me get blocked? Yeszzzz (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not to speak for ScottishFinnishRadish, but this is a good example of an addition you made that contains unverified content. When you add material, it must be accompanied by a reliable source that verifies that content. This is a relatively short block; I encourage you to review the links available here while you wait to resume normal editing. Best ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn’t even connect with reliable resource it’s just the name in Kurdish, Kurdish language is the second language of iraq Yeszzzz (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And whatever picture I upload gets blocked for the reason of ‘’copyright’’ it’s just a picture of a pilot there is nothing to do with copyright Yeszzzz (talk) 16:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{ping|Pbritti}} Yeszzzz (talk) 17:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, Yeszzzz, but I don't think you are competent to edit here. You continually fail to understand what people are telling you about sources and copyright. I see you've got a 7 day block at Commons for multiple additions of material which had no evidence they were copyright free. The fact that you continued to do the same thing over and over - 16 times I think, without understanding the reasons why there were deleted is extremely discouraging. Doug Weller talk 19:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where should I get copyright from? they were posted on social media back in ISIS era and I’ve provided every reliable sources if you check the drift you can see by my newest update but it’s keeps getting cancelled and I got banned just by writing the Kurdish name of Iraqi ground forces. Yeszzzz (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have to have proof that they are not in copyright, the default assumption is that they are. Or have a compatible license. Read your Cimmons talk page. Doug Weller talk 22:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And now I have been blocked for ‘’multiple account abuse’’ which I have no connection to that account, can I know why everyone’s against me? I’ve literally provided every reliable resources and for only a photo I have been blocked Yeszzzz (talk) 09:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How can I get unblocked? I know I was not with the policies of Wikipedia and I apologize for the mistakes and I want to appeal it Yeszzzz (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that you have asked this question despite the fact that the answer is below enforces my belief you lack the competence to edit. Doug Weller talk 14:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know I had some lack and problems but I assure you that it won’t happen again since I’ve read the rules and the policies, I really appreciate if I can get another chance of being unblocked Yeszzzz (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve requested multiple but none got answered Yeszzzz (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the website since I don’t think I can in my talk page because I got IP banned Yeszzzz (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please help me? Yeszzzz (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You requested what and where? Vanjagenije (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeszzzz but this is your talk page. Here?[1] Doug Weller talk 19:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for asking but should I add it by (add topic)? Yeszzzz (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m IP blocked I don’t think I can send anything can you help me? Yeszzzz (talk) 11:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know you are IP blocked and where do you want to send what? Doug Weller talk 17:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mean by talk page and when I was only 2 weeks blocked but now I’m permanently blocked and when I log out In still blocked and can’t continue editing Yeszzzz (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you be logged out? Doug Weller talk 19:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because I can’t literally do anything it says your banned ‘’indefinitely’’ and I checked if I was IP banned and it was true Yeszzzz (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to get unblocked by admitting to attempting WP:IPSOCK is a bold strategy. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti I feel sorry for this editor as they clearly are struggling. I’m wondering if it would be actually meriful to remove TPA. Doug Weller talk 21:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: I don't know. I want them to have the chance to practice on another Wikipedia in their native language and feel more welcome to return to EnWiki someday. Revoking TPA is a pretty severe preventative measure for CIR. Hopefully, seeing our socking policy is enough to establish that IP block evasion is prohibited. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti Sounds good to me. I was just wondering. I've tried to help, failed. Doug Weller talk 07:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Combatuser1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Combatuser1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Vanjagenije (talk) 09:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Vanjagenije (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yeszzzz&oldid=1186075828"