User talk:Wardog98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wardog98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Super Bowl Most Valuable Player Award did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  —Bagumba (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bagumba which part cause mahomes is a three time MVP winner they confirmed it Wardog98 (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I updated it. Please actually explain what you're changing in your edit summaries instead of saying "Fixed typo." City of Silver 04:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@City of Silver I edited it as it still said that mahomes was two time MVP when he's three time MVP, next time you remove something and turn it to old news then I know you don't edit the page. Wardog98 (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't update several other parts of the page that needed this information, you changed the word "2nd" to "3" instead of "3rd," and you used the false explanation "Fixed typo" on your edits. The situation wasn't resolved until I worked on it. City of Silver 04:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@City of Silver what else am I meant to put Wardog98 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just assumed that another editor had reverted you because there wasn't a reliable source mentioned in your edit, even in the edit summary. —Bagumba (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Mike Allen 20:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeAllen I edited it because of what the percents was on Google and that to back up why do I need to explain to myself? Wardog98 (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you look at Google and not Rotten Tomatoes? Since that is the scores you were updating. Mike Allen 08:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]