User talk:WTKitty

Welcome!

Hello, WTKitty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States at the 1980 Winter Paralympics has been accepted

United States at the 1980 Winter Paralympics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States at the 2018 Winter Paralympics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Walsh, Spencer Wood and Tyler Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States at the 1976 Winter Paralympics has been accepted

United States at the 1976 Winter Paralympics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 00:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States at the 2018 Winter Paralympics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kevin McKee, Jack Wallace and Adam Page (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antiguan and Barbudan general election, 2018

Please stop changing the opening text to the article, which is consistent with other articles in the series. If you continue to change it then I'm afraid I will will eventually be forced to report you for disruptive editing. Thanks, Number 5 7 07:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States at the 2015 World Archery Championships (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United States at the 2015 World Archery Championships and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:United States at the 2015 World Archery Championships, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 02:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WTKitty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK _Discuss 02:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 11:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a general note of courtesy can I get some information on what is going on here I was editing quite happily and now I cannot seem to be able to edit? WTKitty (talk) 11:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WTKitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea what this means. As a general note of courtesy can I get some information on what is going on here. I was editing quite happily and now I cannot seem to be able to edit? Also what is checkuser and why was anything carried out in the first place? I have no idea what is going on here. WTKitty (talk) 11:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. In any case, we know you are the same person behind Sport and politics (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 11:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment CheckUser evidence means non-public logs available to a select few Wikipedians, and it can be used to look at which IP edited under what account. Right now, you have been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you are abusively using multiple accounts, which is not permitted. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 11:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. All I can say is I am very very confused. WTKitty (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: What exactly do you mean by what you have written. I am incredibly confused. What do you mean

we know you are the same person behind Sport and politics (talk · contribs).

@Bbb23: Can you please give some reasons behind what is going on here. I am very confused. I have no idea who the user Sport and Politics is. Why exactly was a checkuser (Thank you to @Rob3512: for the explanation) carried out? Also what is the evidence here? I have not been given any reasons here or any explanation of what is going on. Also what is the way to go about an unblock request if what I have previously filed is not an unblock request?

Just for your clarification, "This is not an unblock request" referred to the fact that, per WP:NICETRY, you didn't actually appeal your block, merely commented upn it. Although, since S&P made numerous unblock requests, the implication would be that you know how to file such a request already. FYI. —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 13:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129:Thank you for the information I shall have a read of the link and go from there. WTKitty (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WTKitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reasons have been provided as to why I have been banned. There have been no reasons provided as to why the checkuser was carried out despite pinging the blocking administrator. The rules prohibit fishing as a reason for carrying out a check user, but without any reasons being provided the blanks are going to be filled unless information is provided. Unless actual reasons are provided regarding why I have been blocked I am going to have to assume there is no reason. For the fact that there are no reasons other that "a check user was carried out" and "we know you are the same person" neither of which are in fact reasons I am required to assume there are no reasons. WTKitty (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unambiguous, Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Talk revoked - you may appeal your blocks from your original account. —DoRD (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:United States at the 2013 World Archery Championships

Hello, WTKitty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United States at the 2013 World Archery Championships".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 06:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]