User talk:Valerian456

This is Valerian456's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Valerian456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Ϣere SpielChequers 13:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Johann, Count of Cleves

A tag has been placed on Johann, Count of Cleves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 10:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've had to tag this lot for deletion I'm afraid; simply being a member of the nobility isn't enough for notability, in most cases. Ironholds (talk) 10:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about merging them into the Counts of Cleves into Duchy of Cleves? Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 10:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since Cleves was an independent state within the Holy Roman Empire I've declined those speedies - those guys were heads of state and therefore notable. Ϣere SpielChequers 12:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

I can offer you help with the basics of wikipedia and can get you to a good standard. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er...okay. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 12:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't sound so sure? Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 12:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely sure? Because if you are I would like you to tell me what you want to get from this adoption. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 12:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do have any questions about the adoption or wikipedia? Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 12:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then I will make a program page for you and will give you 1 task, and sometimes 2, a week. It will be on the talk page of your program page on which you can ask any questions and we will talk further about your adoption. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 12:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link to your program page. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out as soon as you can. I have given you your first task and you have a week to complete it. Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 12:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct

After you removed my speedy tag, I decided to watch the progress of Lego Jim. Your comments have come across as almost rude to me - I would advise that you read WP:NPA, WP:CIVL and WP:BITE. Other than that, keep it up - every user that contributes to the encyclopedia is valued. —LedgendGamer 09:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 09:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick look at your contributions, it struck me that you might be interested in Friendly. The catch is that it's only confirmed to work on Firefox, Safari and Opera, and I'm reasonably sure it's limited to the monobook skin. —LedgendGamer 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. I don't feel comfortable using Firefox. Valerian456 ^{Hush, Rush} 09:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Advice

Hello, Valerian456. You have new messages at Wadester16's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Historical figure notable for one event. Sufficient coverage provided at Bernard (son of Charles the Fat).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Valerian456. You have new messages at User talk:Dank55/Apr.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also ... if someone blanks a page when they're the only editor of any significant content on the page, please don't restore the page; we take blanking to be a sign that they're fine with having the page deleted. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Fila3466757 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Per admission at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fila3466757. EdJohnston (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk reply

	Hello Valerian456. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you! Zoo Fari 21:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
	You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Valerian456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I told you not to block me, and I even said please, but you blocked me! I also never vandalized! You guys are certainly insane.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet accounts are pretty much never unblocked, so if you think you've solved the problems that made the original block necessary, request the unblocking of the original account, making a persuasive case that unblocking you would be good for the encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia

I have nominated Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf, Count of Rhaetia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note

You are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xeno^talk 14:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]