User talk:Unknown User Double

January 2021

Hello, I'm DVdm. Your recent edit to Square root appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that ℹ️ (information) was in 2 books about math! How can you say it “wrong”? Unknown User Double (talk) 00:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Math: Roots, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please do not create unnecessary templates or unviable drafts. Kinu ^t/_c 02:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! But I am blocked user now, so let me free! I won’t do that again! Unknown User Double (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sqaure root moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sqaure root, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Larryzhao123 (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sqaure root

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sqaure root, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NJD-DE (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me free again! I won’t edit in wrong ways again! 13e3e8f9637d292e44812dc7d4046b83

I want to be UNblocked! Here’s the code, 13e3e8f9637d292e44812dc7d4046b83 Unknown User Double (talk) 00:53, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} ==

I want to be unblocked! Let me free. Unknown User Double (talk) 00:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unknown User Double (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t edit in wrong ways from now to forever! Unknown User Double (talk) 00:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think you're doing your best to contribute to Wikipedia, but you don't even understand why your edits were wrong or disruptive. That means that you'll probably continue to make the same edits. Try reading through square root and compare your edit to what's in the rest of the article. One thing that you should immediately notice is that your edit contradicts the information in the Wikipedia article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I read it, but I still can’t edit it! Unknown User Double (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unknown User Double (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please! Unknown User Double (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.331dot (talk) 09:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|1=I won’t edit in wrong ways, and I will use same account: Unknown User Double, from the day when I will be unblocked to forever, I promise. Unknown User Double (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Please let me unlocked. Unknown User Double (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unknown User Double (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t edit in wrong ways, and I will use same account: Unknown User Double, from the day when I will be unblocked to forever, I promise. Unknown User Double (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have demonstrated that your understanding of English is, I'm afraid, not sufficient. You don't understand what you are being told and cannot adequately communicate to others here. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(e/c) I do not believe you have the competency to edit English Wikipedia, and therefore I have revoked your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 13:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.