User talk:Trivialist/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Speedy deletion declined: Marketplace Homes, LLC

Hello Trivialist, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Marketplace Homes, LLC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not substantially similar to deleted version. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Stop making unnecessary edits and promoting subscription links

Case in point, Escape from Tomorrow.

As simple edit of the existing link would suffice instead of linking to a subscription-based service. Undoing your edit and editing the previous link.

Further, casual deletion of categories, links or long-standing edits without proper explanation does a disservice to the community.

Please consider the views of your peers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.137.66.56 (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Speculation on Loonatics' characters' ancestors

Well we don't know for certain but Queen Ty'Rahnee seems the most likely logical candidate of the eventual mother of Marvin's child.

Jdogno5 (talk) 00:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

List of Loonatics Unleashed characters

What happened to the article?

Jdogno5 (talk) 00:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Could it go back if someone put in the referrences? I'd do it.

Jdogno5 (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

If you can put the article back, then I'll insert the referrences where necessary.

Jdogno5 (talk) 00:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Guidance / help needed

Hi Trivialist, I was wondering if I could bend your ear (eye?) for a moment. Though I have several thousand edits under my belt and I've been doing my part to curb vandalism, etc, I've yet to go to WP:ANI or file a request for comment. I'm curious if you could offer some guidance on how to deal with this editor. They apparently never use the preview button, and instead, they save after every change, (added spaces, subtracted spaces, word change, plural, etc). Worse, they appear comically indecisive, and I've noticed that after several edits, the article winds up back where it started. I've detailed two examples of this on their talk page. The result of this type of editing, is that the article edit histories are flooded with their edits, as is my watchlist. I've engaged the user in discussion, but to no avail. What's the next step here? It's not flagrant vandalism, but the edits are extraordinarily disruptive. Thanks, and sorry to bug you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Simon Wells". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 18:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

What is the point of deleting links that are appropriate

You deleted an external link beacause of a reason I dont know. What do you mean by it didn't seem appropriate?? The point of Wikipedia is to help users right, to help them find knowledge. If you just delete a link you didn't think was appropriate just by looking at it, How is that supposed to be helpful for anyone. You made edits and additions to Wipedia, give others a chance to share their knowledge!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan889 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Ain't Got Nobody, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Just a Gigolo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

What's the problem?

How come you keep reverting the stuff I do? Whether it be lists I worked hard to compile or movie posters with better resolution, you apparently don't care for it. As for those list issues, I have yet to understand how that is copyright, because by that standard, any of the films in that list should be deleted from Wikipedia, and the same would go for AFI's Top 10 Lists. Second, I reverting your undoing of the Raiders poster, and I gave a reason why on the page's "view history" section. I left the Jurassic Park poster as it was when you changed it. --Matthew (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Even so, the Raiders poster I added is not only more well known, but the tagline also is "The Return of the Great Adventure". That is in reference to the adventure serials of the 1930s that Spielberg and Lucas were inspired by. It also has more characters and objects drawn on it, which is more highly connected to the posters of the film's sequels. It also, in my opinion, just simply looks more visually appealing on the page. --Matthew (talk) 17:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, seriously, though. Now you undid practically everything on the Raptor article? I did that a while ago... are you scanning my contributions list and picking random things to revert? First Raiders and Jurassic Park, then The 100 Scariest Moments and BTTF Part II, and now this? You're starting to make me mad. --Matthew (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Quick question about WP:HOUNDING

Hi Trivialist, a quick question: I've noticed a semi-new IPv6 user making edits that remind me of the New Jersey Winnie-the-Pooh Vandal (long story, but the User Talk link for May 2013 has all the IPs). As I go through this recent editor's history I notice that much of it should probably be reverted for excessive detail and grammatical problems. Is there an elegant way to do this that doesn't trip over WP:HOUNDING? I don't want to harsh the kid's mellow, but their edits do not meet our standards. (Though they have improved somewhat, if they in fact are the NJ Pooh Vandal) Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Tiger Electronics

I was able to cope with you reverting edits on articles like Jurassic Park and Back to the Future Part II. But this is getting quite ridiculous, you just reverted my long and difficult work on Tiger Electronics. I added images, an infobox, more sections for readers to better fully understand the company and its products, not to mention changing the one item in the "see also" category from its former title that results in a redirect (Superplexus) to its current name (Perplexus). Yet you went ahead and erased it all, without giving any reason whatsoever. I'd be less annoyed if you gave some kind of reason, even it was completely far-fetched and out of left field. So I went ahead and put it back. So long and thanks for all the fish. --Matthew (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:SPI case that might be of interest.

Hey, I've been sitting on this one for a few months because it was weird when we both got targeted, and I suspected that this user might return. And, they're back! I should say that I suspect they're back. [1] Please comment if you have any thoughts and/or if you have any other evidence from doing your rounds! Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

DB non-English

You tagged বাংলাদেশের স্বাধীনতা যুদ্ধ বাংলাদেশের সামরিক বাহিনীর সেক্টর এবং সাবসেক্টরসমূহ for speedy deletion simply because it is not in English. A quick review of the speedy deletion criteria will show that this is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Text written in a foreign language should be tagged as not English (using the {{not English}} template), and nominated for translation at WP:Pages needing translation into English. In this particular case, a bit of work in Google translate shows that this appears to be an article in Bengali about the Bangladesh Liberation War, an topic on which we already have an article, so I have change the db tag to a {{db-a10}}. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Oops. Thanks for the tip! Trivialist (talk) 12:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

KiKa Logos

There is a plethora of reasons why these logos are not copyrighted, beginning with the fact that they do not exhibit the level of creativity required for a copyright. Furthermore -- have you actually read the information provided in the image-files? I am going to restore them again. Wahrmund (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Trivialist, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Tariqmudallal (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

EUREKA page

Please refrain from moving or uncapitalizing EUREKA as that is the name of the organization as is. It is never spelled as Eureka in any scenario, even if you feel as though it should be. That being said, could you please revert your moving of the page to Eureka (organization). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajdewalt (talk • contribs) 14:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Andy LoCascio

You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

hello?

hello? i need your help. the Pingu (series 1) article could do with some reconstructing without anything copyrighted mentioned in it. Visokor (talk) 10:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Third opinion

I've removed your request at WP:3O as it was not neutrally-worded and the situation did not seem to require a third opinion. Please let me know if you have any questions. DonIago (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Art Bell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Green card and High Desert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Viacom Enterprises

Hi. In response to your edit at Viacom Enterprises, I posted a suggestion on what can be done with this page here. Freshh (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Garrejones44444777 ‎

Hello Trivialist.
You may be interested to know that Garrejones44444777 (talk · contribs) has a short block. You may also be interested in my post on the blocking admins talkpage here.
Regards, 220 of ^Borg 10:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Now I see that you know all about this per this, so you can just ignore it! [[File:|25px|link=]] I did find 208.163.137.16 (talk · contribs) though. --220 of ^Borg 10:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

You should not vandalize pages.

You should not vandalize pages. That is not what having an account is for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stopde (talk • contribs) 23:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Here Today, Gone Tamale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John W. Burton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Neutral notice

This is a neutral notice to all registered editors who have edited Jack Kirby in 2013 that there is a discussion on its talk page regarding the article's infobox image: Talk:Jack Kirby#Photo update. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Trivialist. You have new messages at Tariqmudallal's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tariqmudallal (talk) 23:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

205.215.222.75

205.215.222.75 was blocked today for vandalism after performing exactly the same kind of edits 75.168.49.3 was performing a few days ago. I do not understand what the purpose of these edits is, as they are blatantly wrong, but they do not seem like simple acts of vandalism, either. Do you have any insight on this? ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 19:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

No problems

No problems with your edit at Escape from Tomorrow, might be relevant on some pages and not others, not a problem at all!

Thanks for your interest in the subject.

Have a great day!

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 00:18, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:PROTAGONIST

Seriously, what is your thing with removing the word "protagonist" from standalone articles on fictional characters? If it's a second heroic character I don't see why "secondary protagonist" violates this minor manual of style that you constantly enforce.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

It's not Trivialist's thing, it's a guideline that Trivialist is upholding. The linked guideline explains precisely why we should avoid such labels, but the short version is that it's original research for us to label a character as the protagonist unless a reliable source has done so. One could just as easily ask why it should be important to label characters as such. DonIago (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

If it's a superhero in a kid's TV show then I think that qualification is met by common sense. And in all honesty I've only ever seen him enforce this part of that guideline on pages I routinely edit.—Ryulong (琉竜) 14:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

"Common sense" is frequently used as a rationalization for why sourcing isn't necessary, but if something is in fact commonly known then finding sourcing for it should be relatively effortless. If you are suggesting that Trivialist is wikistalking you then you should be expressing that concern instead. DonIago (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

@Ryulong: I'm just searching for phrases like "secondary protagonist" or "tertiary protagonist"; no wikistalking was intended. Trivialist (talk) 15:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I never said anything about "wikistalking". But is the removal of "secondary/tertiary protagonist" necessary when it could just be changed to "a protagonist"?—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

@Ryulong: Per WP:PROTAGONIST: "Interpretations in the form of labels (e.g. protagonist, villain, main character) should be avoided. A well-written plot summary should convey such roles." Trivialist (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

If it's on a standalone article then the context won't be as clear, mostly because these articles shouldn't be entirely composed of plot summary as has previously been the case.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

@Ryulong: In that case, some sort of reference should be provided when identifying a character as, say, a "tertiary protagonist," because otherwise that's just a personal interpretation. Trivialist (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I believe it should be possible to describe the gist of the character's actions without getting into serious plot summary territory, but I'm open to reviewing specific examples. DonIago (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

From what I know, the only reason "tertiary protagonist" was used on the article that I routinely edit was because it was the third character to become a protagonist (or superhero or whatever) in the work of fiction.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

In that event I would recommend either a) describing the character through its actions rather than using a label, or b) finding a reliable source that uses the term "tertiary protagonist". I would also question whether it's really necessary to use such a label in any case. DonIago (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Labelling a good guy in a black/white morality of a children's program seems straightforward enough not to require such sourcing but "tertiary" is a bit of a stretch.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Pax/Ion Television

Some user keeps removing information that Ion Television was originally called Pax TV in the article on Ion Television. He/She thinks it's not true and important, but it is to all of us. Could you please do something about the user? I'm trying to have an edit war, but this user is. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

WP:AN

A discussion concerning the creation of improbable redirects, related to a page or pages you created, has started at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive257#Mass creation of very improbable redirects. Fram (talk) 11:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WaterTower Music may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Game of Thrones]]'' season 3]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the creation on The Looney Tunes Show music article. Blurred Lines 01:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Interesting thread

Hi, I noticed some of your recent edits and thought you might be interested in this thread. I think it's related to the problem you're tackling. -Thibbs (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

20th Century Fox

We must use JPG to avoid competing original market role. JPG is inferior to PNG, but it helps us avoid a lot of risks. --George Ho (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Strike that; JPG is less risky, but PNG is lossless. I guess favoring one format over another is ineffective. I attempted to undelete the PNG copy of the iCarly logo to delete the SVG file, but there was no consensus agreement on undeleting the PNG file and deleting the SVG one, which is superior to the PNG format. I guess... what can we do about the JPEG and PNG copies? --George Ho (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Public Domain cartoons

Hey doc, the Paramount cartoons are not the only cartoons that are in the public domain, so can you please stop remove the details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.51.74.67 (talk) 13:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alvin

I'm Too Sexy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Histrionic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Template requested for deletion

I am requesting deletion on Template:Non-free Apple screenshot. --[[Tariqmudallal · my talk]] 23:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Walt Disney may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[STeven Watts, Steven. ''[[The Magic Kingdom: Walt Disney and the American Way of Life]]'',

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_December_9#.5Cx22Weird_Al.5Cx22_Yankovic

There's a discussion about redirects you've created. You might want to comment. —rybec 22:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Move to Cylon (2004)

Just wondering where the discussion was for this move, as there's no mention of it on the article's talk page. Really should be 2003, since the first broadcast work of the reboot was the miniseries, shouldn't it? --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Los Angeles Plays Itself

Can you please point me to the section of Wikipedia's policies that prohibits using references which link to the full contents of a copyrighted work? Furthermore, is it really the role of Wikipedia to decide the legality of the content in the references or is it the goal of Wikipedia to link to as much relevant external information as possible (legal agnosticism)? If you believe the former to be true, you may want to investigate the countless articles referencing Wikileaks documents. But don't lose sleep over it as most of the intellectual property ever produced is legally dubious depending on your jurisdiction and use of aforementioned content.

Thank you, BDS2006 (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There's WP:ELNEVER. But you have a good point about links to Wikileaks. —rybec 07:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hello Kitty's Furry Tale Theater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page B.J. Ward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Daffy Duck edit

Test edit, but like i said before i promise from now on too use the sandbox when i make test edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daffyandbugs (talk • contribs) 17:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

"The late" Alistair Hulett

Hello, Trivialist. You have new messages at Talk:Andy Irvine (musician).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee. (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Trivialist. You have new messages at Talk:Andy Irvine (musician).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

With kind regards; Patrick ツ Pdebee. (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

celebritynetworth.com

You mass deleting sources, to this changes must to be discussion and consensus between more users. Where is consensus for removed celebritynetworth.com from articles of Wikipedia? Please give a link to discussion and consensus or your edits will considered willfulness/lawlessness. Subtropical-man (talk) 09:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

First: Info of "All information presented on CelebrityNetWorth.com is gathered from sources which are thought to be reliable, but the viewer should not assume that such information is up to date or completely accurate or final. CelebrityNetWorth does not assume responsibility for any errors in the information it presents on this site...." exactly fits to Wikipedia, see: "All information presented on Wikipedia is gathered from sources which are thought to be reliable, but the viewer should not assume that such information is up to date or completely accurate or final. Wikipedia does not assume responsibility for any errors in the information it presents on this site....". So, it does not matter.

Second: there is no complete discussion and also there is no any consensus for remove this source from Wikipedia, from all articles where it is used.

So, your edits are considered willfulness/lawlessness. Please stop removing sources without (until) official consensus. Subtropical-man (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Good [2]. Let it be discussion and consensus. Regards :) Subtropical-man (talk) 17:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Politicization of science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear energy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tim Storey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southeastern University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gloriæ Dei Cantores may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• , [[Samuel Adler (composer)|Samuel Adler]], [[Mark O'Connor]], [[Stephen Cleobury]], [George Guest]], [[Daniel Pinkham]], and [[Margaret Hillis]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Buddleja 'Blue Gown' may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''''Buddleja'' {{'}}Blue Gown{{'}}''' was raised at Sir John Quicke's<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/6932742/Sir-John-Quicke.html</ref> garden at [[Newton St

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Trivia - Sidekick (TV series)

Hi Trivialist, I was wondering if I could trouble you for a third opinion at Sidekick (TV series). I've gone back and forth with an editor who (in my opinion) doesn't understand what trivia is, and I want to avoid a 3RR, particularly if I'm in the wrong. The content being submitted is here. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks mang, very frustrating sometimes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sea-Monkeys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankenweenie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Edited definition of User Experience

User Experience: Please stop removing the definition of user experience. It's both accurate and up to date. That site has a comprehensive glossary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Vincenzo (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

THANK YOU

For starting the Template:John Hodgman, Hodgmania is forever in your debt. Thanks! (from Team Hodgmania)--DrWho42 (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Albums produced by "Weird Al" Yankovic

Category:Albums produced by "Weird Al" Yankovic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited General Educational Development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pearson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ellis Henican may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• another bestseller ''In the Blink of An Eye: Dale, Daytona, and the Day that Changed Everything]'' (Hyperion_Books) with driver [[Michael Waltrip]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Systematically removing "tragically" from articles

I guess you're on a gnome crusade to remove "tragic" from the start of every statement that precedes death in some way. That might actually be appropriate in many instances. But a few problems. First, describe what you're doing. You saying "copyedit" is not sufficient when you're doing this stuff wholesale off a list I know you searched for or compiled specifically for this pattern (it didn't take many to see). Second, pay a bit more attention. I only noticed you because you took it out of one of the instances where it makes sense, on chalk outline. Chalk outlines don't represent just death... they represent some sort of macabre tragic death, that's the humor in their trope. But that nuance in the article is lost when you just plow through. And don't get me wrong, I do AWB... I plow through and do all sorts of edits, and sometimes i get them wrong. But fix your edit summaries, and pay a bit more attention. I try to avoid removing editorial content from articles in this way when I'm doing wholesale edits. I hope you'll do the same. Shadowjams (talk) 07:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Tagging of On the Air (band)

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on On the Air (band). I do not think that On the Air (band) fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because As per WP:BAND "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians" establishes notability. So an article about a band with four blue-linked members makes a claim of significence. . I request that you consider not re-tagging On the Air (band) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 01:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Jatt Dizzle and The Underwater Mixtape article.

Why did you have my articles nominated for speedy deletion? Its completely credible with valid sourcing and references. There's no reason for a deletion. As far as contribution towards the nation as a whole, this is just free information. I understand deletions made for dumb things but my article looked legit and was legit. and not to mention it wasnt even finished. I was going to update information as time passed. Roughly a week and the wiki pages would have had more information and more references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitajp (talk • contribs) 06:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Jatt Dizzle

I will now re-encode the information that was on the last deletion and "re-publish" my artice. please don't delete my article. Give me more reasoning if you must. But don't delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitajp (talk • contribs) 06:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Scientology as a business (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Skeptic (magazine)

Simon Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dr Faustus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding It's Tomorrow - The Film

I do not understand the language of writing an article and do not understand the speedy deletion thing after providing enough proofs about the subject. Please explain in detail how to get this thing going. — Preceding unsigned comment added by It's Tomorrow - The Film (talk • contribs) 20:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Georgia and James Speedy Deletion

Hi I was wondering what your reasoning was for putting the Wiki page up for Speedy Deletion? You never specified why in your message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesgking (talk • contribs) 20:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Transport as a Service

I responded to your contest. I am still building out the article a little. Please remove the speedy deletion tag after review. I actually came to Wikipedia to learn more about this industry concept after reading about it in Forbes and was surprised Wikipedia didn't have an entry. It is used to refer to things like driverlass cars and internetworked car data and communications and is worthy of a wikipedia article, IMO. Sjledet (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Nuclear Scandal

You should provide reason, after moving Nuclear Scandal to South Korean nuclear scandal. You should be aware, that there is no other nuclear scandal. OccultZone (Talk) 14:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Names? OccultZone (Talk) 02:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, for adding more knowledge to my bank. OccultZone (Talk) 04:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dual relationship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congregation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

About Hadley Wickham and the Tools

Hadley Wickham, you forgot to add "Unreferenced"? The tools you are using such as AutoEd, Page Curation, they are worth it? OccultZone (Talk) 14:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Gwak Dong-yeon's name

Check Gwak Dong-yeon. "Kwak Dong-yeon" is WP:COMMONNAME, and original name. Opinion? OccultZone (Talk) 05:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

OwnTracks

Hi Trivialist,

I am not sure how my page differs from something like the page for Google Latitude? It is a page describing a piece of open source software that many people would potentially find quite useful. Admittedly this is my very first attempt at a WIKI page so I am very new to the process but what else would my page need to include in order for it to meet the criteria of A7?

Cheers, Sumnerboy (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Sumnerboy

Regarding Ibhejo.com

Hi Trivialist,

I just received a message. I don't wish to advertise through my page. I only intend to inform people about the existence and origin of the company like any other e-commerce portal. If there is any content or links that appear promotional, please let me know and I shall delete them. I am new to Wikipedia and am trying to get create this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gayatri0704 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

John Young (brewer)

I have removed your notability note from this page as it fully complies with the general guide for notability and its sources include three major British newspapers. In addition, compare with some of the other John Youngs included in Wiki, He has had a very noteworthy life

DonJay (talk) 03:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of MarketInvoice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MarketInvoice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MarketInvoice until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jojalozzo 05:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Young (brewer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Nash and The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! continued

Hi Trivialist, In looking through your talk page, I noticed that I (DonJay) has sent you a Wikilove message. Unfortunately, I did not originate it. I subscribe to politeness wherever possible and formality when the pressure rises. In my message on John Young, I tried to use the latter. This was because in your communication you did not elaborate on what you thought was not in compliance. However I hope that any dealings e may have in the future may continue on a friendly manner.

DonJay (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply and edit. I think you have much improved the page. I have changed one minor point, "real ale" to "Real ale" in the text. This due o the "real" not being used as an adjective, but as part of the noun (see its use in the UK papers). Many Thanks

DonJay (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Peter Abell

Thank you for adding the BLP Sources tags to the page. I created the page for my supervisor, with whom I work closely, basing the information mainly on his CV that is published at the LSE website - http://www.lse.ac.uk/management/documents/cv/PAbell-CV-Jan-2011.pdf

Would a reference to this CV be enough to make the tag go away? Could you advise what further information would be needed in order to transform this from a stub to a regular article? thanks!! Engelo (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to USP may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[USS Saint Paul|USS ''Saint Paul]]]], the name of more than one U.S. Navy ship

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Larry Williams (horn player) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bistech may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 25th year by expanding|publisher=Reed Business|date=December 12, 2013|accessdate=2013-12-12}}</ref>)
• * [http://www.bsigroup.co.uk BSI]<

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Monster Go-DJ may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dale Hansen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/dale-hansen-makes-perfect-case-leaving-gay-football-player-michael-sam-alone-229053</ref>, [[People (magazine)|''People'' magazine)''<ref>http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20786683,00.html</ref>, and others.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kappa Beta Phi may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |date= February 18, 2014 |accessdate= February 21, 2014 |work= Daily Intelligencer |publisher= [[New York (magazine)|''New York'' magazine}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joe Murray (animator) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a web network entirely dedicated to cartoons. On April 20, 2010, Murray launched a donation drive] on [[Kickstarter]] to fund the project, he required $16,800 by June 5 to reach the total funding

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Primrose Schools, Chennai=

Hello, Trivialist. Please take the tag for speedy deletion as I'm a student and I'm busy with my annual exams, I couldn't complete my edit. I will surely go through suggestions for essential content. It is actually incomplete. I will complete it surely. Please do understand my situation as I need to study for my exams. Hope you realise and remove the tag. I will finish my edit on March 10, 2014. Thanks Marshini Ganesh 18:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 08:07, February 26, 2014‎

How can I regain my deleted article? Can I create a new one? Please do help me........ Thanks "Marshini Ganesh" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marshini Ganesh (talk • contribs) 00:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Article The Witch's House

Thanks for reviewing this, I have added the needed references. Got some questions? Please write on my discussion page, you are always welcome. Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

A25 song proposed deletion

"...for a variety of reasons".

I disagree for reasons I have placed on the talk page. And you did not give any reasons why it should be deleted. Man with two legs (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

RPCS3

Sorry for writing such a small article. I do believe it's notable now, thanks to the video of it working, I just don't know how to prove it with just that one citation. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinium (talk • contribs) 04:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Speedy deletion nomination of Test article for sandbox page

Sorry for what I did , I was playing around with my sand box , when by mistake I posted the content on Wiki . Thank you for speedy deletion . --Commons sibi (talk) 04:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Zubin Damania

Hey boss. I am not Zubin Damania and his page is not an autobiography.

After I add citations to avoid linkrot I will remove your warning label, ok? Let me know and thank you.

Richard ruffian (talk) 16:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Africa unite party

regarding africa unite party...i honestly do not know WHY you have tagged my article as the AUP is a legitimate poltical party with credible source references.

earthoeansEarthoceans (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)מ

SPS Commerce

I revised SPS Commerce to address concerns regarding advertising language and jargon. I added nine new references to address general notability concerns and deleted non-third party press release references. After, I deleted the warning label. Please let me know if this suffices to warrant removal of the label. Also, would you consider removing the 4 hidden categories associated with the warning label if required criteria has been met? Thank you. Hattiedog (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Regarding speedy deletion

Hi Trivialist,

You said that it should be deleted for various reasons? What are those reasons? --19-FOUAD-97 (talk) 09:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I was planning to expand the article any way, however, when it is contested for speedy deletion, there is no much use. What are the chances of allowance to others and I expanding this page?--19-FOUAD-97 (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)