User talk:TerraCaucasus

Saint Astvatsatsin Church (Ramis) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Saint Astvatsatsin Church (Ramis), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Gevorg Church (Nakhchivan) (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at St. Gevorg Church (Nakhchivan) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Gevorg Church (Nakhchivan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GeoBotCaucasus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Astvatsatsin Church (Ramis) has been accepted[edit]

Saint Astvatsatsin Church (Ramis), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, GeoBotCaucasus, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TerraCaucasus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I already changed my username to a proper one TerraCaucasus (talk) 16:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Yeap. Unblocked. Happy editing! Yamla (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, TerraCaucasus. Thank you for your work on St. Nshan Church (Ashaghy Aylis). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

~~~~ TerraCaucasus (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Yukhari Aza moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Church of Yukhari Aza, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve St. Hripsime Church (Kultepe)[edit]

Hello, TerraCaucasus,

Thank you for creating St. Hripsime Church (Kultepe).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this article on an historic Armenian church. Unfortunately, the article does not seem to establish sufficient notability for the building WP:NBUILDING in its current form.
It seems that the main source you rely on is a report titled Silent Erasure: A Satellite Investigation of the Destruction of Armenian Heritage in Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan from 2022, which lists over one hundred destroyed buildings considered to be part of Armenian historic heritage in Azerbaijan and discussed as evidence of wider "cultural" erasure. That in and of itself does not constitute in-depth coverage required to satisfy notability criteria. Moreover, the page numbers do not correspond to the publication which has a total of 219 pages, according to the document you link.
Is there anything particularly notable about this church that makes its inclusion notable when compared to the rest of the buildings listed in the report? If so, please address that clearly in the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ppt91 (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Ppt91,

If you look closely, you would see that the number of pages of the document is 2x219 because the document is in two-page view mode. I hope your understanding of the importance of the monument is not similar to your very quick and hasty overview of the number of pages of the document. I suggest you have a look at the relevant page of the document for the monument's importance.

Best

~~~~ TerraCaucasus (talk) 21:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TerraCaucasus First, I'd encourage you to abide by WP:EQ and engage in the review process assuming good faith. You and I have the same goal, which is to ensure the notability and high quality of published articles. There is nothing to be gained from being dismissive of my efforts.

Perhaps there was a misunderstanding: the page numbering (which I now see clearly and which for some odd reason must have displayed wrong on my end) was a minor issue relative to the question of notability, which relies on the same content, i.e. a few short paragraphs of a similar length to other buildings covered in the report. Is your goal to create a separate page for each one of them? Or are you selecting specific buildings that are of more historical significance relative to the broader issue of cultural erasure in this case? Either way, more explanation of WP:NBUILD is warranted.

These are valid questions that I would expect a serious editor to address without implying I am rushing through the process. That is especially the case given that another church mentioned in the publication had previously been moved to draftspace (referenced pp. 188–191 of what appears to be the same publication), and the rationale behind the notability of each of remaining buildings is not obvious. Ppt91 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on new articles[edit]

Hello TerraCaucus. I'm MarioGom, a new page reviewer. I'm currently reviewing various of your creations, and I hope I can give you some feedback about them soon. Here are the first things that I noticed:

While it's not mandatory, you'll help the discoverability of your pages, and avoid work for others, if you add WikiProject tags to the talk pages. You can see an example here. There is a user script that makes it easier to add them at User:Evad37/rater.
Please, avoid duplicating references, and add the {{reflist}} template to the references section. Example here.

This is something you can apply to any article creations on any topic. Next, I'll be looking into the notability of your creations of former or ruined Churches. Feel free to contact me if you have any doubt. Best, MarioGom (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MarioGom,

Thank you for helpful feedback.

Best,

~~~~ TerraCaucasus (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	St. Hovhannes Church (Tumbul) is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @BoyTheKingCanDance!!!

~~~~ TerraCaucasus (talk) 00:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:St. Gevorg Church (Nakhchivan)[edit]

Hello, TerraCaucasus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Gevorg Church (Nakhchivan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Church of Yukhari Aza[edit]

Hello, TerraCaucasus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Church of Yukhari Aza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Church of Yukhari Aza[edit]

Hello, TerraCaucasus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Church of Yukhari Aza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]