User talk:Taskforce51mc

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AmyMHollywoodNow per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AmyMHollywoodNow. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

UTRS decline[edit]

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

please see UTRS appeal #37144 User admits to socking and claims "harassment" by @GeneralNotability:. User needs to address concerns raised at the WP:SPI. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Taskforce51mc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Deepfriedokra Hey, I don't appreciate being accused of these false accusations, I did not admit to being a sockpuppet at all. And I'm being harassed by User:GeneralNobility. My editing input is constructive because is Amber Martinez is a real actress, she was on the cover of the Los Angeles Tribune two days ago. I've seen Amber Martinez also on television and in movies. I would even add, constructive valid sources that would show that she's further a public figure.

Decline reason:

You admitted to sockpuppetry by saying " I also will admit that I know the original author of the article and was helping them because they have been the target of a campaign of harassment by Captain Sim for weeks now." More specifically, that is called meatpuppetry. Since we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer operating a particular account, when we see two accounts doing the same thing, we must treat them as if they are the same person. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.