User talk:Shushugah/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Prison education

Hi Shushugah. Thanks for stating your willingness to help at Prison education at GMG's talk page. Obviously help of any kind is appreciated. If you're not sure where to start though it would be good to just have a new set of eyes read everything and make suggestions for what needs work. Essentially just doing an FAC type review, before it's actually at FAC. The goal is to renominate it there so any comments on what might need to be done to get it to pass through that process are welcome. Or if you'd like to help in another way please let me know. No worries if you're too busy or anything though, just thought I'd follow this up once. Have a nice day. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 06:49, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks again for your comments. The FAC nomination is now live: see here. If you have the time to comment there I'd appreciate it, and let me know if you need comments on a review somewhere. Cheers. Damien Linnane (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi again. The nomination is about to be pushed down to the 'Older nomination' section, and while support is unanimous to far, based on my prior experience with FAC there just haven't been enough comments yet to reach a consensus. If you have the time to take another look I would appreciate. Just thought I'd bring this up once more; I'll leave it with you from here. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 23:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

@Damien Linnane congrats on the DYK and successful FAC nomination! My biggest inspiration/takeaway was to be persistent in encyclopedic global coverage, despite unevenness in geographic sources available. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 11:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate your comments. And very glad to hear my work can serve as an inspiration for similar things. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Elisabeth Schmitz

Engmaj (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Thank you for your suggestions. I have incorporated some into the DYK nomination. I agree that the article should have more categories. I'm on a deadline for something non-Wikipedia related but will go back and add some. So, links within articles should be kept to things within Wikipedia itself? Good to know. Again, thanks. Engmaj (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

WikiDonation template

Hello! With your new template I noticed that if a user uses the reply tool, the colon to indent is placed at the commented text and so the actual template reply is unindented. I think this can be solved by moving the commented text to the bottom. I can make this change myself if you tell me how I would edit the template to show this. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Blaze The Wolf I am on phone now so cannot easily test it myself but makes sense. Given that it’s substituted and not a live/actively used template you have my encouragement to make test edits and revert if needed. The formal testing process otherwise is to make a copy at Template:WikiDonation/sandbox and then call {{WikiDonation/sandbox}} somewhere using both reply function and a source mode edit. Another possible solution is to add : again on the 2nd line ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright. But how would I make these changes to the actual template? Is there some source code page I can't access or can I simply just edit the text that is used in the template on the page for the template. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

You should be able to edit Template:WikiDonation directly. I’ll double check default permissions but cannot recall any default protection for templates. I didn’t add any in any case. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

@Blaze The Wolf Am on computer now. This is the link, if you're unable to edit, you'll see the source code without an option to edit it locally or save. See this external link [1] ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

When you moved the commented text you forgot to remove the leftover space from where it was. Due to it automatically inserting the signature it appears to be incompatible with the reply tool since the reply tool doesn't know that it will do that, and so it automatically inserts a signature. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

I see that you have made recent changes attempting to stop the Reply function from duplicating the signature. My testing (on my User Talk:Verbarson page) shows that the signature is currently still doubled up by the Reply tool. I have therefore added a warning on Template:WikiDonation/doc.-- Verbarson (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Would simply removing the signature be a solution? Enabling its usage in visual editor without source code would be easiest, and allow for source mode editors to add their signature anyways? Thanks for checking it/updating the docs ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. Adding a sig is a matter of habit.

If you remove the signature, we would not have subst it, but then it would always appear with the latest text. Possibly a bad idea for talk pages - you don't want to get a reply, then when you go back later find it has changed?

So - remove the signature, keep the subst? Verbarson (talk) 00:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

yeah definitely keep the subst because we don’t want to change text and mislead people. Perhaps a future template is more harshly worded etc… ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Random suggestion about the template but maybe an alternative way to use the template would be {{subst:wikidonation}} (all lowercase) since I think most templates use all lowercase in the wikitext to invoke them except for yours, so just writing it all lowercase doesn't work. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, maybe there should be a version of the template for registered users who have an account but don't know that they can disable the banners? ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Blaze The Wolf created {{subst:wikidonation}} redirect which is all lowercase now. I don't have a strong opinion on creating more/alternate templates. I'd prefer to keep it simpler, as the usage of {{wikidonation}} is likely limited as is. You could create your own template, or edit the existing one to not assume it's an IP address. Be WP:BOLD ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 20:45, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I don't actually know how to create my own template since from my knowledge that requires writing code so it functions correctly. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Blaze The Wolf if you ever want to learn how to make Templates, am happy to support you. This is a good example of something with minimal code. The signature was the most complex part, and even I simply removed altogether it as a pragmatic solution. You can read more at Help:A quick guide to templates. To create a template like you suggested, you could open Template:Wikidonationsigned and enter whatever written english you want. It would work as {{Wikidonationsigned}} already. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 20:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Diplomatic missions of Djibouti

A tag has been placed on Category:Diplomatic missions of Djibouti indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Volkswagen worker organizations

On 1 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Volkswagen worker organizations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on initiative of the Volkswagen worker organizations, Volkswagen formed one of the first Global Works Councils in 1998, an extension of the existing European Works Council? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Volkswagen worker organizations. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Volkswagen worker organizations), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Banjarmasin

Sorry - was going to start the GAN for Banjarmasin (created the subpage) but noticed it was removed from the list on the backlog drive, and it turns out you had planned to review it. Do you want to take it instead? If so then I'd be happy to hand it over - I haven't started yet. eviolite (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

@Eviolite Yes please! I have my comment saved, and appreciate you offering! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

allan maraynes

Thank you for responding regarding my Wikipedia drama.

As I said, I had a page (not a draft) that was active for 7 years until recently when someone said it needed more citations. Couldn't find the person who originally created this page so we tried editing and added more than forty accurate citations that cite my work over the years, awards, and direct references. If you look at the draft you can see who I am and why the page was there to begin with.

If there is a consensus that my work is no longer "notable" (it was for seven years) so be it. Delete me.

If not, is there any way for you (you seem to be objective) to look it over and can we chat either via email or telephone?

I have some other email accounts and will give you my mobile number if necessary. I am almost 72 years old now and would like to clean this up.

Best, Allan Maraynes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amaraynes (talk • contribs) 16:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

have a goat :)

Apparently j (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Shushugah

Thank you for creating John F Kelly (professor).

User:Shushugah, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This article easily passes Wikipedia:Notability (academics). It's currently missing WP:CATEGORY tags for example Category:American medical researchers and Category:Living people

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volkswagen worker organizations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Volkswagen worker organizations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 11:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volkswagen worker organizations

The article Volkswagen worker organizations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Volkswagen worker organizations for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diplomatic missions in Libya

Template:Diplomatic missions in Libya has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diplomatic missions in Peru

Template:Diplomatic missions in Peru has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, I saw your Facebook Wikipedia weekly about the Taskforce. My local language is Twi which I'm also an admin on the wiki. I would be glad to collaborate and translate those articles into my local language. Thanks and hope to hear from you soon -- Robertjamal12 (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Diplomatic missions in Trinidad and Tobago

Template:Diplomatic missions in Trinidad and Tobago has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Nigej (talk) 08:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Rename category

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Ford Motor Company Labor relations to Category:Ford Motor Company labor relations Hugo999 (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

@Hugo999 No objections from me! I checked none of the other sibling categories have the same issue ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup & the Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive

Hi there, you're receiving this note because you're currently signed up for the 2022 WikiCup and don't yet have any points in the competition. As you may know, scoring any points in the first round is traditionally sufficient to advance to the second, and a fast way to get 5 points is to complete a good article review. Given that the January 2022 Good Article Nomination Backlog Drive is active for another 10 days, you might be interested in pitching in. Complete one review, and you'll be on to the next round in WikiCup; complete two or three, and you'll also be eligible to win some barnstars. As always, quality reviews with attention to detail are expected. Cheers, --Usernameunique (talk) 19:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

@Usernameunique I'm the third most active contributor in the GANBD at the moment, I was planning on tallying my scores at the end of the month for the WikiCup (along with some GA/DYK nominations of my own), is there a deadline soon tho? Kind regards ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 19:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Shushugah, yep, that's the consequence of quickly making a list of people with 0 points in the WikiCup and sending a mass message their way. Do note that per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, "In the spirit of fair play, contestants have 14 days to nominate their work after promotion (for good and featured content), appearance on the main page (for did you knows and in the news articles) or the completion of good or featured article reviews and featured list reviews, by entering it on their submissions page." If a couple are past the deadline at this point, I wouldn't worry; the first round isn't particularly competitive, so missing out on a few points won't hold you back. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review of First homosexual movement

Hello Shushugah. I'm about to start a copy-edit of First homosexual movement. I see that you recently agreed to conduct a GA review of the article; you may wish to wait until I finish my copy-edit to begin your review. I anticipate finishing within the next 12 hours. Rublov (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

@Rublov thanks for letting me know! That's great to hear! If you want feedback on anything, am happy to give suggestions as well on copy-editing/styling ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Sure, if you want to take a look at my changes, any feedback would be welcome. Rublov (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Shushugah, the copyedit has been done. Do you know when you might be able to get to the review? If you're not able to do it, I can ask for another reviewer. Thanks, (t · c) buidhe 01:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volkswagen worker organizations

The article Volkswagen worker organizations you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Volkswagen worker organizations for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Devil in Christianity GAReview

Hello again. I see there is a request for a second opinion on the review page of this article, and that no progress has been made for a couple of weeks. I can certainly offer a second opinion, but I am wondering if you might prefer me to just take over the review entirely. If you are committed to it, don't let me interfere, but if you have too much on your plate and would like to let this one go, just ping me. We will ask the nominator and move on accordingly. Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Features for new users coming soon (and mentors, like you, wanted!)

Hello. As you're listed as a host at the Teahouse, I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

• Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
• There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
• Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Abandoned reviews

Shushugah, you still have the following open GA reviews, started as part of the last backlog drive in early January, but which you haven't touched since late January: Talk:OpenVMS/GA1, Talk:Adam Naruszewicz/GA1, Talk:Hasan ibn Ali/GA1, and Talk:Guido Imbens/GA1. Can I assume that you won't be returning to them, and that we should find other reviewers for them? Please let me know. If you haven't replied within seven days, I will place them under second opinion in hopes of finding another reviewer. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Posting to note that, the seven days having expired, I have placed all four nominations under second opinion in the hopes that a new reviewer will pick them up and finish them. I hope you are well. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

BlueMoonset I have been giving that second opinion on Devil in Christianity. I am only temporarily held up because my mother died last week and I am in the process of closing her estate which both the author and Shushuga are aware of. I have every intention of finishing that review within the next week or so. Jenhawk777 (talk) 04:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Jenhawk777, I am so very sorry to read about your mother. Please, take whatever time you need, and thank you for taking on the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the sympathy and understanding - and the extra time. Once I get back home it will go quickly I think. Should a change in status be posted at the GA page? Jenhawk777 (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

BlueMoonset I am finally home and will begin reviewing again. I have attempted to change the reviewer name on the talk page and at the GAR page and have had no luck. It still shows Shushugah as the reviewer. Do you know how to fix that? Jenhawk777 (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Jenhawk777, when people take over existing reviews, the original reviewer typically remains up top on the review page (and thus on the WP:GAN page), so Shushugah is going to stay there. New reviewers typically announce themselves in a new level-3 header and gets to work. If it's important to you, we can mention the change in the "note=" field of the GA nominee template on the article's talk page. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

GAR of Devil in Christianity is complete and needs your response

I have finished the review [2]. I believe any and all issues have been successfully addressed and that this article currently meets all the criteria for a good article. It should be passed. I would do it, but you are still listed as the reviewer, so I can't without going through a big rigamarole. Yes I know that means you will get the credit, but it's not a big deal. The article deserves the credit. Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 20:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Jenhawk777  Done and done. Twas a pleasure co-reviewing and I think I am back from my editing hiatus! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:43, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

YAY! Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

For your significant contributions.... Keep it up!

Volten001 ^☎ 19:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Starbucks Workers United logo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Starbucks Workers United logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Bhushita Ahuja

Sorry we clashed, feel free to move back to main space and send to AFD. Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Help with my draft

Hi I have sought help on Teahouse as well, but efforts seem to go round and round. My draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Swami_Avdheshanand_Giri has been declined and rejected by a sock, who also was accused of vandalism through his various accounts during investigation. What should i do? In my opinion my article is in sync with wikipedia guidelines, what else can i do so that it is published, its been a year. Request you to help Shatbhisha6 (talk) 22:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Help me to Fix my Article , It has been Nominated for Deletion

Hello . my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhushita_Ahuja has been nominated for deletion due to non matching wikipedia policy. I need your help please tell me how i can fix my problem. Super30867 (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1978-1980 strikes in Brazil

Hello, Shushugah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1978-1980 strikes in Brazil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Foxconn unions

On 23 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Foxconn unions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Foxconn union, representing more than 90 percent of Foxconn's 1.4 million workers, is a company union dominated by management? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foxconn unions. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Foxconn unions), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siemens worker organizations

Hello, Shushugah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siemens worker organizations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Microsoft and unions

Hello, Shushugah, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Dr vulpes, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Microsoft and unions, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft and unions.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dr vulpes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

I really appreciate the way you handled the Microsoft and Unions article discussion. You handled everything in a professional and kind way and this meant a lot to me as a new page reviewer. For some reason I just didn't think to rename the article which in hindsight is pretty silly of me. You've done a lot of impressive work and I hope to I run across more of your articles in the future.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Dr vulpes thank you for your kind words and recognizing my professional/kind demeanor. Ultimately, we're all here to improve Wikipedia. Receiving a notification for AfD is definitely not the nicest feeling, but you made your concerns clear and a solution was possible. One specific feedback I'd give, is to include an indication of what WP:BEFORE search you've done. Admittedly, searching Microsoft Union returns a lot of noise, both about recent US Labor neutrality agreement/general microsoft documents for unrelated union activity. I did additionally find Temporary Workers of America, who were part of CWA Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (a red link with many links across Wiki). ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

References

MfD nomination of Template talk:Diplomatic missions in Brunei Darussalam

Template talk:Diplomatic missions in Brunei Darussalam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template talk:Diplomatic missions in Brunei Darussalam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template talk:Diplomatic missions in Brunei Darussalam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. - nathanielcwm (talk) 06:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Good luck in the future and hope to see you around. Enjoy the rest of the summer! — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 12:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

+1 -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

A beer for you!

That was brave, and hopefully influential. Cheers. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 00:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I'm sorry it didn't work out, but I'm sure it will in one or two years! CLYDEFRANKLIN 02:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Well done anyway

Congrats to you for throwing your hat in the ring. I’ll move from neutral to support next time round if I see more admin related work. Stay well MaxnaCarta (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

I thought your withdraw comment was pretty awesome. Thanks for upholding the fourth pillar. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

I'm sorry that you didn't get to be an admin and be able to block people or delete pages. How about a nice cupcake instead? Mushroomtop (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

your RfA

Hi. First of all, thanks a lot for running. I really appriciate, and respect your gesture. The reason I came here is, your RfA is currently having ups and downs. I request you to not to withdraw for at least 3-4 ways, no matter how shaky it gets. I hope you get more than 75% support. Thanks again, —usernamekiran (talk) 22:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

I also kindly urge you not to withdraw for at least a few days and wish you good luck in the process :) — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

I third this. CLYDEFRANKLIN 04:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Fourth. And ping me if you don't get it and run again in the future. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 13:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

I second the ping comment. This page is now on my watchlist as a Good Editor to watch ^u^ — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 19:00, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Unrelated - Just clicked on your home page and saw we had the same taste in icons, then I saw this dif. Haha, nice! SEMMENDINGER (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

• While I can't personally support your nomination at this point, I wanted to tell you that I'm impressed by your attitude. Even though the RfA is unlikely to pass, your behaviour remains exemplary. Kudos for being cool about it, even though opposition can hurt! If in the future your activity has shifted more and you decide to run again, your chances might be better.

And even without a mop, do stick around! We need friendly Teahouse hosts just as much as we need admins – I know that, for without the Teahouse to help in the beginning, I might have given up on Wikipedia :) --LordPeterII (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

• I intend to let this RfA run its full 7 day period. No matter what the results will be, I am deeply grateful for the civility and consideration by all participants thus far, especially those with oppose rationals. This potentially reflects a positive change in RfA culture. In the slim chance this succeeds, this RfA will never be an outright home-run. In the event it does not success, the civility/cordiality afforded means I would be very open to re-nominating/being nominated again in the future. Either way I absolutely have a lot of reflections/improvements to make. There is no basis for forcing you to withdraw your nomination, but I think the above comment at the RfA is misguided, albeit well-intentioned. You have nominated yourself and your percentage of support is well below that needed to pass. Moreover, the support percentage is relatively constant, hovering in the 50s. Also, the opposes follow similar themes, e.g., not enough experience, insufficient understanding of policy, and no real need for the tools - to name a few. Yet, you insist on putting the community through a process, which, even in the best of circumstances, tends to be difficult, apparently so you can obtain more feedback for the future. There are other ways to achieve that goal without an actual RfA. Plus, I seriously doubt you are going to get any new feedback. I encourage you to withdraw.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

• Sorry it didn't work out, Shushugah, but I think the issues are all fixable. Valereee (talk) 13:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• Even though you didn't get the mop, I can't help but admire your resilience. Scorpions13256 (talk) 14:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• Although I opposed your bid, I wholeheartedly encourage you to come back sometime in the future. After writing some good articles and pitching in at NPP or GOCE, I have no doubt !voters will welcome your resilience and your next RFA will pass. Please do stick around, because there are users willing to help out! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 14:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		This was brave, warm, grown-up and so well phrased. Thank you. I look forward to supporting you for the mop again in future, not least for you being a bigger person than I am. — Trey Maturin has spoken 16:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

• • I'm sorry for the way things went down, but I am glad you ran. It gave me an opportunity to know you better, since all I had before this was that one negative experience. Now I also see a willingness to accept responsibility, and learn from one's mistakes and take disappointment in stride. It makes me wish I had not taken my own disappointment in stride at the time, but had nagged you until it was fixed instead! I thought you just didn't care. Now I think it was more from inexperience. On that basis, and because you have demonstrated such a good attitude about all of this, I want to assure you there are no hard feelings on my part, I hope there will be none on yours, and in the future, if you decide to run again after getting that additional experience, I want to offer my support. Perhaps that will carry some weight for you down the road because of this history. Ping me accordingly when you run again. I wish you well.Jenhawk777 (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

    @Jenhawk777 this was by far the most meaningful message to receive from a fellow editor after my run. I am sorry I wronged you and I am relieved to read that we're on better terms, particularly because we will likely run into each regularly in future GA reviews/backlogs. There are no hard feelings from my part, and it was a humble reminder, that actions as well as inaction can cause a butterfly effect of negative energy. If for nothing else, I am glad my RfA gave us an opportunity to reconcile and co-edit on better terms. Given your areas of interests, I was inspired to read over what our community has summarized in Forgiveness § Religious views. Looking forward to making new memories and quality content together. Cheers! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

    Ditto. Jenhawk777 (talk) 01:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

• My first RFA spent the whole week a few percent below the discretionary zone. My second a few months later was a much easier week. Feel free to look at them when you think you are ready for your next run. ϢereSpielChequers 20:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• Thanks for running, Shushugah: I thought it was exceptional that you held out in the RfA as long as you did considering how intense and unpleasant most people find it. You've maintained a high level of decorum throughout despite many hypocritical oppose rationales and at least one attempt to bullying you into withdrawing though, with all due respect, I can't agree with you here that the RfA has much positive reflection on the en.wiki community. There were valid opposes, however, not just less justifiable ones, so I hope that you take these on board as feedback. My support was genuine, not any sort of "moral support", and I hope to find myself with a "strong support" !vote in a future RfA. — Bilorv (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
• Just wanted to echo/endorse many of the other comments here; thank you for nominating and demonstrating that good intentions do count. Kind regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
• I didn't participate in your RfA as I didn't have any prior experience with you and didn't have time to research an educated opinion - but I followed along and it feels to me like an example of things changing, slightly, in a better direction. Thanks for putting yourself out there, and I look forward to seeing you around. Retswerb (talk) 23:33, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I just wanted to let you know that I've seen all the work you do around here. It has not gone unnoticed. For what it's worth you'll have my support again in your next RfA. Thank you for all you do around here and all the work you put in. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 08:32, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey, I remember August 27 (on September 27)! Erm: we should take a survey about who has the best sig on the project, 🦝 Shushugah or Vermont 🐿️ (yeah, I stole the chipmunk, wanna fight about it?). El_C 13:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Volkswagen worker organizations

The article Volkswagen worker organizations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Volkswagen worker organizations/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Thank you. Coldupnorth (talk) 12:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Apple worker organizations

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apple worker organizations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Greetings User:Lee Vilenski, I am appreciative you picked up this review. I have limited internet until October 23rd, so would it be possible to move this review period to 23-30th? If not, I am also appreciative for your review either way. Thank you and have a nice rest of the day ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 15:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

No drama. I'll have some comments up before then, so as long as it is before the end of the month I'm happy. If you get bored when you do have some time, I do have some GANs myself. Hope you are well. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Apple worker organizations

The article Apple worker organizations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Apple worker organizations for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Campaign To Organize Digital Employees Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Campaign To Organize Digital Employees Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siemens worker organizations

Hello, Shushugah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siemens worker organizations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Shushugah!

Happy New Year!

Shushugah,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Word of Thanks

Hello, Shushugash. It's me from the Teahouse. I just want to say thank you for pointing me in the right direction. Still a bit new to Wiki and trying to navigate. Faithful15 (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Also, happy new year! Faithful15 (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Apple worker organizations

The article Apple worker organizations you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Apple worker organizations for comments about the article, and Talk:Apple worker organizations/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

I just saw that you made an edit to the draft for article Advanced Bionics and said you would add a photo of the Chorus! Thank you for your contribution it means a lot to me. Do you think you can help me add more pictures to the article? I'm new here and not sure how to do it right. Thank you again!----KentuckyPony (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I will gladly upload a photo to Commons (another Wikimedia project) which is most common way we pull photos onto Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Uploading images. But I would recommend focusing first on improving the text. Currently most of the draft text is missing inline citations from secondary/independent sources. The corporate background can come from most newspapers, but any medical claims should have highest quality sourcing (WP:MEDRS. I also saw some of your frustrations earlier, and would encourage you to be a little more patient. AB has existed for 30 years, and whether an article takes a week or 3 months is not a long time in big scheme of things. I certainly agree the company is notable and look forward to collaborating with you. Cheers! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I wasn't quite sure about the formatting of a lot of stuff that I want to site, so I figured I would add them later, especially the court documents. I have found some good stuff in google books like medical textbooks and an FDA magazine, so would those be good things to cite? I also did a lot of research in self-published sources like lawyer blogs that led to finding some German language sources - I assume are those ok to use too? I've cited some Polish books in other articles I've edited, so i think it should be alright but just want to check. I'm not in much of a rush to do the article, I just really thought it was strange that the article kept going away. However I have found a copy of the old article in the way back archive and it serves as a great starting point to help find sources and stuff.----KentuckyPony (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC) I think the draft is ready can you look at it? It just needs pictures added and any other changes you think it needs just let me know.----KentuckyPony (talk) 20:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Special edition strike paper has been nominated for merging

Category:Special edition strike paper has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 21:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For reviewing 4 nominations for a total of 3 points during the June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby award you this barnstar. Congratulations! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon

Hello, Shushugah/Archive 2! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page.

(Manually delivered as you have opted out of WP:MMS ... I removed you from the master MMS list).

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 09:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Somaliland Barnstar of National Merit
		For reviewing and providing valuable feedback to help promote the article Mandera Prison to GA status, the only fourth Somaliland-related article to ever make such an achievement! Thank you for your contributions 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 21:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Signpost Barnstar

		The Signpost Barnstar
		Enjoyed your article on WikiProject Organized Labour. Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 05:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!!!

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For your participation and help at Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023. It wouldn't have been such a success without you. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 03:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Some popcorn for you

	Some popcorn for you
	You said you had run out, so here's some more. Thanks for making me smile today. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Branstar for you

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For encouraging others to be BOLD. 多多123 (✉ • ✎) 12:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Good luck with your RfA, I'm rooting for you!

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 07:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Good luck

Although I'm personally opposing the nomination, I wish you good luck throughout the process and an unstressful week ahead.— Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. 09:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

A little advice

Hi Shushugah. Can I first say thank you very much for nominating yourself for adminship - placing yourself under community scrutiny is not a fun thing to do, and doing so because we need more administrators is admirable. However, I've been watching and working around RfA for a few years now, and I'm afraid that your RfA is currently at a point that I cannot recall a recovery from, i.e. over 100 votes and under half of them in support. At this point, I would recommend withdrawing, as I do not believe you will gain more meaningful feedback, and the longer you leave the RfA open, the more negativity it will draw - hampering your ability to run again in the future. If you'd like to debrief, please do feel free to contact me and we can discuss options going forward. Worm^TT(talk) 09:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Yeah I am here for a similar issue. I am also worried a bit for your well being. To receive one oppose with a lot of goodwill is one thing but two with the next one not having a similar amount of goodwill is tough. I hope I still see you around after the RfA because you seem a good editor with important article interests.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle @Worm That Turned thank you, and I heeded your advice. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Sad to see...

...that you had to withdraw your RfA candidacy. But given the numbers, I understand why. I meant what I said in my support and I hope you try again. Don't give up. All the best to you. Acalamari 02:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

• I second this, and especially respect your answer to Q9. Best of luck in your future endeavors! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thanks for your work on union-related articles! It's a largely under-covered subject, so it's very nice to see! DFlhb (talk) 22:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Jewish-Israeli Dissent Leipzig

A few months ago the article I created on Jewish-Israeli Dissent Leipzig was deleted. The only article I've ever created that's been deleted. It was very obviously targeted by Zionists. I was wondering if you might be aware of additional references about the organization in German? I was wondering if the article could be recreated. If not, I was going to incorporate the information about the group into the History of the Jews in Leipzig article. Thank you and Shabbat Shalom. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 05:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Blaze Wolf's userpage

You missed, I guess, that he had publicly declared anyone was free to edit his userpage for April Fool's Day, and many others had added humorous links such as those. Heavy Water (talk) 04:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)