User talk:SerAntoniDeMiloni

Page Move

Hi SerAntoniDeMiloni. You moved Michael Ward (actor, born 1995) to Michael Ward (British Actor)‎, which you should not have done as there is already a Michael Ward (actor) who is British (and a film actor). When we have BIOs whose names and professions are identical, we use the DOB as the next way to disambiguate the names (we also don't use capitals in the descriptor). See Tom Brown for examples. We are going to have to revert this move back, therefore. If you want to move a page and are unsure of the policy/guidelines around article naming, raise the idea on the Talk Page first to check with others. Thank you. Britishfinance (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Gunawardena, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MP and Sri Lankan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Speidel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingsway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Vulcain (watch company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vulcain (watch company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Loksmythe. I will do so in an hour or so. I'm just adding citations now. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 17:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi again Loksmythe. I've just submitted with a plethora of citations. It would be great if you could have a look. Thanks! SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Loksmythe, I've just made a couple of edits that I hope will remove the note about possible ad-like nature (such as the 'Watch of Presidents'). I've given it a re-read, and would like to note that much of Vulcain's history is steeped in their favour with US presidents and their history of gifting the watches to presidents (alongside their invention of the alarm-watch). Are there any other alterations you would suggest? Your help is much appreciated. Thanks SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

+ I've also added some more reputable sources (such as Bloomberg and Business Insider . Here's another Bloomberg () and A German National newspaper (). Most of the sources talking about the history say quite similar things, I have just added more news sources so as to not rely too heavily on a single source. Thanks 😃 SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

References

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SerAntoniDeMiloni! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:21, Wednesday, April 8, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vulcain (watch company) has been accepted

Vulcain (watch company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Inch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Aston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your edits to Boris Skossyreff. Thank you! - Poydoo can talk and edit 15:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! :) SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 17:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leslie Goonewardene

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leslie Goonewardene you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 3 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 08:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beamly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leslie Goonewardene

The article Leslie Goonewardene you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leslie Goonewardene for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 10:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Heroes of Sri Lanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumous.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Leslie Goonewardene

Hello! Your submission of Leslie Goonewardene at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

I've returned the nomination to WP:DYKNA. Please let us know on the nomination template when the image licensing is sorted. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Yoninah. The image is currently being reviewed. I'll let you and Hdolf know when things are sorted. Thanks for your help. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Deprodding of Isra Hirsi

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Isra Hirsi, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LeslieGoonewardenePortrait70s.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LeslieGoonewardenePortrait70s.jpg, which you've attributed to Mr Goonewardene. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi again Diannaa. Apologies for that – the file is OTRS pending. I'll add the tag. Thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Leslie Goonewardene

SerAntoniDeMiloni, in case you hadn't seen it, the nomination is currently on hold pending image licensing improvements for the images in the article. Please see the nomination template for more information. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that BlueMoonset. I've been speaking to the photo author who's been going through the OTRS, and it seems that he's been having some timing issues. He hasn't received a response to an email reply he sent 5 days ago, and the process seems to be going in circles. Do you have any suggestions on how to get more engagement? I'm hoping to get the DYK through before I start college next week, at which point I'll have quite a bit less time to focus on it. Thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 11:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

SerAntoniDeMiloni, things at OTRS can take a while; I've never quite figured out how it works or how to get more engagement than there has been already. I do, however, think that you need to post about this on the nomination page, including the timing issues (both OTRS and your impending college work). BlueMoonset (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vivienne Goonewardene, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yugoslav, Traditionalism and Sri Lankan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Latymer Upper School Facade.png

Thanks for uploading File:Latymer Upper School Facade.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Latymer Upper School 1800s.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Latymer Upper School 1800s.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Whpq. Wow, that was quite quick! I was just in the process of adding it into the article. Thanks though. Best, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Leslie Goonewardene

On 14 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leslie Goonewardene, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while Leslie Goonewardene was one of the largest landowners in Sri Lanka through inheritance, he re-introduced inheritance tax to the country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leslie Goonewardene. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leslie Goonewardene), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020 GAN backlog drive!

-- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vivienne Goonewardene

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vivienne Goonewardene you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SusunW -- SusunW (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Your edit to Vivienne Goonewardene has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vivienne Goonewardene

The article Vivienne Goonewardene you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Vivienne Goonewardene for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SusunW -- SusunW (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boris Skossyreff

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boris Skossyreff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 14:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boris Skossyreff

The article Boris Skossyreff you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boris Skossyreff for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 12:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Stefan Lano Profile.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stefan Lano Profile.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Good article backlog drive in March

In order to receive notifications about future drives, sign up for the Good articles newsletter.

(t · c) buidhe 04:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewYorkTimesWordleLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewYorkTimesWordleLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File:NewYorkTimesWordleLogo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NewYorkTimesWordleLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.172.241.184 (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NotCo Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NotCo Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jefferson Scholarship

Hello! Your submission of Jefferson Scholarship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Jefferson Scholarship

On 6 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jefferson Scholarship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Jefferson Scholarship gives scholars more than $293,000 to attend the University of Virginia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jefferson Scholarship. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jefferson Scholarship), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thome Rodrigo (prince)

The article Thome Rodrigo (prince) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources: source just has a single passing mention of him

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 14:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Thome Rodrigo (prince) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thome Rodrigo (prince) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thome Rodrigo (prince) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reywas92^Talk 17:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jefferson Scholar Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jefferson Scholar Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Wjemather. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to LIV Golf seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PeopleSound Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PeopleSound Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PeopleSound

The article PeopleSound you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:PeopleSound and Talk:PeopleSound/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PeopleSound

The article PeopleSound you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:PeopleSound for comments about the article, and Talk:PeopleSound/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robin Greenwood

Hello! Your submission of Robin Greenwood at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Johnbod (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for PeopleSound

On 21 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PeopleSound, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that PeopleSound was Europe's most visited music streaming site in 2000, and had offered any artist £100 for each song they uploaded? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PeopleSound. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PeopleSound), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robin Greenwood

Hello! Your submission of Robin Greenwood at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Johnbod (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Robin Greenwood

On 10 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robin Greenwood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that economist Robin Greenwood's work has been used to suggest the bubble nature of Bitcoin and Tesla, Inc. valuations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robin Greenwood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robin Greenwood), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Deprodding of Silicon Milkroundabout

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Silicon Milkroundabout, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TartarTorte 14:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Baroness Joanna Shields page

My name is Laura and I work for Joanna Shields, Baroness Shields, a baron, businessperson, and former British politician. The page about her was recently tagged for COI and advert issues due to some poor edits made years ago. I posted here regarding my desire to address the substance of the tags with a re-write or heavy trims, to remove the promotional content. I was hoping you might be willing to chime in on the proposed trims and/or the suggestion for a rewrite. Let me know. Best regards.~~~~ LauTad89 (talk) 07:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Delta Phi

Delta Phi does *not* prefer to use St. Elmo to the greek letters. Please bring up such a significant change on the talk page. I'm reverting. (Also, the image added is larger than any other similar image for a GLO.Naraht (talk) 17:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, Naraht; I was just about to do the same. Mr. DeMiloni, over some years we have clarified and standardized our syntax for fraternity and sorority articles. This has been accomplished by a very active group of project editors. Project groups, often populated by editors that are knowledgeable about a particular subject, add value both by their tacit knowledge and their passion for a subject. Good project groups are consistent and not scattershot. Over several days you have offered edits to the Delta Phi article, only that one out of over 3,000 articles we track, all of which edits have been reverted. May I ask your connection with that group? I note you offer regular changes to articles relating to Sri Lanka. Because I don't know much about Sri Lanka, except for the fact that Arthur C. Clark lived there, I would defer to those, like you, who are more knowledgeable about that nation to make all but the most routine edits, such as the correction of typos. Fair? Jax MN (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Of course! Thank you for the kind input. I'd been reading several articles on the US educational system after going on a tangent on the University of Virginia, and thought I'd try cleaning up some articles. I saw the St. Anthony Hall article as a GA, and thought I'd try use that template. Of course, happy to make corrections with guidance. I'd note that the image I found seems to represent far better than the old image. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Edgard & Cooper

Hello, SerAntoniDeMiloni,

Thank you for creating Edgard & Cooper.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Lots of sources with COIs and unreliable sources in references such as 1, 3, 16, 21... could use some trimming but likely notable per the non-english sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justiyaya 17:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @Justiyaya. Might've relied a bit too much on those citations when researching. Will make the appropriate fixes. Many thanks, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey @Justiyaya. Would be great to get your thoughts now; I've had a little run through. Thanks. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Nicely done! Looking back I misidentified a few sources as being non-independent that were independent, sorry about that. Great improvements on the article and removing the ones that I haven't misidentified, thanks a lot for the fixes :D. In popular culture might work better with a sentence instead of a bullet point, but regardless nice work, happy editing! Justiyaya 14:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the guidance @Justiyaya! Best, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Verlinvest moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Verlinvest, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Verlinvest

Hello, SerAntoniDeMiloni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Verlinvest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Verlinvest

Hello, SerAntoniDeMiloni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Verlinvest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Latymer Upper School 1800s.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Latymer Upper School 1800s.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

– Joe (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerAntoniDeMiloni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here I’ve been editing on Wikipedia since the end of 2017, age 12, and in that time have written pages on many of my interests – from History and South Asian Independence, to start-ups and tech. From watches to microbiology. The pages I have written have always been dictated by my interests, rather than the interests of others.

In this time writing, I’ve contributed heavily to Good Article reviews, with 9 if I remember right, and have written 2 Good Articles myself on interesting historical figures. These have been from scratch and features on the DYK section.

I’m also a student. A couple of months ago, a friend asked me to write a page for IFIT (which he is affiliated to). This was not done for payment. Being a university student, and naturally not having money, the friend suggested that for helping write this page, I could be introduced to three fellow nonprofits and could try asking for payment.

In reflection, I understand that this was a grave mistake. That I should not have proposed partaking in editing for payment for the three nonprofits. These pages were never built, and these conversations did not progress. It came from a misguided suggestion, and was wrong.

Aside from the edits made for IFIT, which were unpaid but done as a favour, I have *not* edited in a paid manner before. I have not received renumeration for my work, and I have edited on pages that pique my interest. Sometimes for very niche aspects.

I have made a grave error in entertaining the idea of paid editing, and for not disclosing helping IFIT build their page. For this, I heavily apologise. I have read the paid editing disclosure requirements, and now understand them fully.

Aside from IFIT, which was unpaid but with the suggested on payment from one of the three instructions, none of the pages I have written in the past have been paid editing. I am happy to walk page-by-page through every one of my edits since 2017 if this helps.

I apologise greatly for this conduct, and hope that my long 7 years of editing on Wikipedia, and on contributing to it, is not overshadowed by a broke student’s lapse in judgement. I have learned, and shall not make this lapse again. I hope I am given the opportunity to continue editing and contributing to the many Wikiprojects as I have before, and appreciate your time in this. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 19:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on the private evidence available to functionaries, I'm not convinced that you're being entirely honest here or that you will be an asset to the encyclopedia if unblocked. Spicy (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Recyclable nappies, probiotic yoghurt, a Tuscan winery, a Nigerian priest, a Chilean vegan food manufacturer – that's quite an eclectic range of interests for a teenager. I can't discuss the off-wiki evidence that led to this block here, to protect your own privacy as much as anything else, but I will say that it's very convincing. Your fastest route to an unblock is to be as forthright as possible. Paid editing is not strictly forbidden on Wikipedia, but undisclosed paid editing is, so you will remain blocked until we're convinced that you've disclosed all your clients and will abide by WP:PAID and WP:COI going forward. – Joe (talk) 21:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Joe, Spicy. Yes, of course, please let me explain all. I feel really terrible about having been blocked, because Wiki editing has been a huge passion of mine for so many years, since childhood. I’m mortified, and very much hope that my openness and genuine remorse will allow me to redeem myself.

The pages I’ve written reflect many of the eclectic interests I have. For instance, Speidel and Vulcain were written in 2020 when my school classes were cancelled. I’m an avid watch collector, and had bought a Vulcain Cricket from the 50s, which came on a 50s Speidel band, on eBay. I got quite interested in the history of both, so I delved into writing their pages. I had little else to do.

Other pages like ZF Sachs were written by transcribing from German language pages. Here, a relative worked for the company in the 1800s, and the company had been defunct for a decade or so I believe.

Lots of the startup company edits seem a bit more sporadic, but I did an unpaid internship at a venture capital fund called the Craftory a few years ago (where my dad works). I wrote pages around startups I met there in my spare time because I was quite interested in their work, and because writing these pages allowed me to connect to a couple of founders after I’d written their pages. I found that it allowed me a pretty unique opportunity to connect with interesting people I’d never get to connect with otherwise. The only payment I received from the Craftory after I wrote their page, and only after telling them I had written it, was a baseball cap, and nothing else. A couple of the startups, specifically Dyper and Edgard & Cooper did send me a few hundred pounds each as token appreciation, but only after meeting the founders, after writing the page. I’m just a student, and I made the mistake of accepting these thank-yous without disclosing the pages as “paid work”, because I just didn’t think of them as such because I hadn’t gone out soliciting the work commercially. That was nevertheless the wrong thing to have done, and I’m sorry for that.

The Nigerian priest is the pastor of a friend in his London ‘flock’. My friend knows about my wiki hobby, and he asked me as a favour to try build his pastor a page. I created a stub from what seemed notable in 10 mins and left it there. Most of what’s there now wasn’t my work. The winery is one that my grandparents used to own, but that I haven’t been back to since the early 2010s. New owners expanded quite a bit since, and I thought the winery was noteworthy of a page, so I wrote one. I didn’t get paid for this.

I haven’t written pages with input except for a couple of professors, who I’d reached out to in order to better understand their work, especially for rather complex things like microbiology. Lots of the microbiology profs just came out of interest after writing the page on Seed and meeting its founders (the probiotic company).

I think the work that verges closest to solicited paid work was the page for IFIT. A college friend reached out, asking if his father could ask me a couple of questions about Wikipedia. His father runs the institute, and asked me if I could help him write a page. He noted that, as a charity, they don’t have much money, but that he might be able to help me make some money from my writing if I could help out. They’d been looking into some sort of page writing services, but suggested that if I could write the page, I could be introduced to some of their partners who could pay.

The page was sufficiently notable, and the opportunity to earn some money was quite motivating. I wrote the page, and then IFIT helped me write a brochure for a wiki writing service using other pages I’d written in the past as examples. They introduced me to three of their partners in the foundation space, and I made the mistake of trying to solicit paid editing. I deeply apologise here. This was a mistake, and I now clearly see this.

I’m hugely proud of my body of work for Wiki, and I have met some fascinating people as a result of my editing. I would be absolutely crestfallen if my mistake in not managing paid work properly would preclude me from continuing to contribute to Wiki, and being part of the Wiki editing family, especially with my wide range of pages from Boris Skossyreff to Leslie Goonewardene. I have very much understood my mistake, and hope that my contrition might persuade you to give me a second chance. Yours hopefully. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the honesty, but basically what you're saying is that almost every single article you have created over the past six years involved a COI, some of them financial COIs. And not only did you not disclose any of this or follow any of the guidelines given in WP:COI, you actively denied them when challenged. That is nothing to be proud of and not encouraging. If you want to make another unblock request then it's not up to me whether to accept it, but I would be worried that you continue to see Wikipedia as a professional networking opportunity. – Joe (talk) 07:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, I don't want to out you here (and please be careful about what you disclose yourself – connecting dots is not hard), but if I have correctly deduced from the above who your father is, then you have also made direct, undisclosed edits to articles about him, his companies, and other members of your family. Frankly, there's nothing eclectic about your editing at all: scratch the surface and it all comes back to promoting your family business. – Joe (talk) 07:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Please don’t be harsh. I’ve written over 100 pages on a huge range of topics, none of which involved any conflicts of interest, or payment. As per your request, I’ve diligently listed every single page where a conflict might have been deemed to be in place - it’s 6 in total. Writing about deceased relatives shouldn't be relevant I thought - most of these pages have been translated and expanded from other language Wikis, and are both notable and well cited. My defence is that I genuinely didn’t solicit writing for any fee up until the IFIT page, and the 2 modest thank-yous I received from the startups felt like pocket money rather than payment. I also always adhered to the strict editorial rules, with fairly balanced notable pages in everything I have written, and none of the pages were fluff pieces. I have learned from my mistake, and I assure you it won’t happen again. It's a learning process, I understand that, but it'd be devastating to have something that's such a large part of my life removed without having been warned before. Please give me a chance. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

As a disinterested observer, I don't have any problems with SerAntoni's work. He's been diplomatic, open to criticism, and responsive. Cut him a break. Jax MN (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately the Wikimedia Terms of Use does have a problem with his work, and that is not something we can wave away. – Joe (talk) 08:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry but you have not been adhering to the rules. You're mistaken if you think that writing about your relatives, people and organisations you work with, or want to work with, is not a conflict of interest. You're mistaken if you think transactions involving "a few hundred pounds" ("pocket money"?) don't count as paid editing. You should not have touched any of these pages. If you insisted on doing so, you should have followed the guidelines at WP:COIEDIT, including prior disclosure and refraining from direct edits. I'm sorry if you think I'm being harsh, but I'm telling you this because you seem to want to return to editing and you will need to understand these rules and commit to following them if that is to happen. – Joe (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I have fully understood. I was young when I started, I hadn’t read the rules, and made an error.

I’ve now understood very clearly what constitutes paid editing, and that I should stay far clear from accepting any thanks or rewards, and that I will never again even go close to anything that could be deemed a COI, for which the definition I have now read and clearly understood. It’s black and white for me now, and that’s how I’ll keep it. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 08:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Joe Roe. I’ve 100% understood the errors I made, and I now fully understand how I need to navigate these. I will be glad to add any and all required disclosures to the handful of pages relevant, now that I am aware how to manage this. Given my passion for wikipedia editing, and my large body of faultless work compared to the few mistakes I made, I would be greatly appreciative if I could be given the opportunity to make amends here? Is there a path forward? Cheers. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

You need to make a new unblock request, as you did above. For fairness, it's another admin that decides, not me – I'll defer to whatever they say. – Joe (talk) 07:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerAntoniDeMiloni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I’m submitting this unblock request after a long and very helpful discussion with Joe Roe on my talk page. Reading through it might provide some helpful background to my request.

I’ve understood very clearly the mistake I made in soliciting paid editing, and those I made regarding conflicts of interest. I was just 13 when I started my Wikipedia editing journey, I hadn’t properly read the rules, and I made an error. The handful of contentious pages were a mistake, and a misunderstanding on my part of what paid editing and COI management constituted. I’ve now understood what I did wrong, and it won’t happen again.

I’ve been editing on Wikipedia for a long time now. I’ve published over 100 well-researched and impeccably written pages, and had a set of good-articles too. I would be greatly appreciative if I were given the opportunity to make amends here. I understand where I have erred, and I hope my mistakes and misunderstandings on these handful of pages do not counter the many well-cited pages that I have poured thousands of hours into. I understand the rules like black-and-white now, and that’s how I’ll keep it. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your wikilawyering above about how you don't actually have any COIs and haven't really been paid lead me think that you can't be trusted. If your interpretations of policy are that loose, you're unlikely to follow our policies. And if you think there's nothing wrong with the articles you've been creating, you're likely to continue making them without any disclosure. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@NinjaRobotPirate Not sure if my message came off entirely right. My intention was to emphasise that I have understood where I have gone wrong here. That I absolutely do understand that paid editing is detrimental to a what Wikipedia tries to be. That I understand the mistake I’ve made with going down that path, and that I will not stray down that path again. That I’d like to add conflict notices to the pages that are contentious, because this editing is now black and white to me.

I’ve volunteered thousands of hours in the past, and written a very broad range of pages. I’ve got quite a lot of them on my user page – a testament to the pride I have in this work. I’m trying to counter this block not with malicious intentions, but because I still feel I have much more to add. Please give me another chance. I've learned from my mistakes.SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 08:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate – just wanted to see if you've seen my message. Thanks. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 14:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dyper Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dyper Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Seed Inc.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Seed Inc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tenuta Monte Rosola Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tenuta Monte Rosola Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheCraftoryLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheCraftoryLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Latymer Upper School coat of arms 2020 –.png

Thanks for uploading File:Latymer Upper School coat of arms 2020 –.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Latymer Upper School coat of arms 2020 –.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Latymer Upper School coat of arms 2020 –.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)